The Political Party That Inherits Super Intelligence in 2028: AI, Constitutional Power, and the Civilizational Stakes

Pax Silica companion circuit **Companion articles:** [The Gigawatt Is the New Measure of War](https://bryantmcgill.com/article-the-gigawatt-is-the-new-measure-of-war) · [The Political Party That Inherits Super Intelligence in 2028](https://bryantmcgill.com/article-the-political-party-that-inherits-super-intelligence) **Collection:** [US–Israel Leadership Alliance](https://bryantmcgill.com/collection-us-israel-leadership) **Core routes:** [Pax Silica](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Pax+Silica) · [US–Israel AI Superpower](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/US-Israel+AI+Superpower) · [US–Israel Technology Integration](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/US-Israel+Technology+Integration) · [Machine-Age Alliance System](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Machine-Age+Alliance+System) · [AI Superpower](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/AI+Superpower) · [Technological Patriotism](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Technological+Patriotism) · [Superintelligence](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Superintelligence) · [Constitutional Succession](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Constitutional+Succession) · [Computational Incumbency](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Computational+Incumbency) · [Government Removability](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Government+Removability) · [Constitutional Safeguards](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Constitutional+Safeguards) · [Political Demography](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Political+Demography) **Why treating 2028 as an ordinary presidential election would be strategically naïve.** Vladimir Putin’s famous 2017 warning has acquired an entirely different meaning in 2026. Speaking to Russian students, Putin said that artificial intelligence brought “colossal opportunities” together with unpredictable threats and that **“the one who becomes the leader in this sphere will be the ruler of the world.”** He immediately connected that proposition to autonomous warfare, predicting that a combatant whose autonomous systems were destroyed by those of another side could ultimately have no alternative but surrender. [KSL.com](https://www.ksl.com/article/news/business/putin-leader-in-artificial-intelligence-will-rule-world/45634364?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Nine years later, the United States government has itself adopted the terminology of **“Super Intelligence”**: on September 29, 2026, President Donald Trump ordered the executive branch to use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI,” arguing that contemporary systems increasingly amplify human ingenuity across science, medicine, and other domains. Technically, that executive order does not announce that scientists have crossed a generally accepted threshold into superhuman general intelligence—the order temporarily maps the new terminology onto the existing statutory definition of AI—but politically the nomenclature is remarkable because the government is explicitly framing machine intelligence as a new epoch of national capability. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inaugurating-the-era-of-super-intelligence/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Putin’s proposition becomes even more important when it is brought home from geopolitics into constitutional politics. Artificial intelligence is an intention multiplier. It does not give a state, corporation, political party, military organization, religion, or civilization a purpose of its own; it multiplies the capacity with which an existing purpose can be pursued through research, planning, communication, optimization, surveillance, administration, defense, finance, and execution. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-ai-multiplies-inherited-intentions) Machine intelligence compresses the interval between wanting something and being capable of doing it. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-intelligence-intention-capability) A government possessing sufficiently advanced systems gains not one new ministry but something closer to an intellectual nervous system distributed across every ministry [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-government-machine-intelligence-nervous-system): continuous legal analysis, intelligence synthesis, cybersecurity, logistics, economic modeling, scientific research, communications, targeting, fraud detection, bureaucratic administration, translation, simulation and eventually autonomous physical execution through robots and weapons. The Trump administration’s June national-security memorandum already describes AI as among the most transformative technologies in American national-security history and directs the national-security apparatus to obtain frontier models, construct high-security computing facilities, establish an AI strategic reserve of technical talent and maintain technological “overmatch” against adversaries. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/06/national-security-presidential-memorandum-nspm-11/?trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block&utm_source=chatgpt.com) This means that a question normally treated as partisan politics is becoming a problem of **state architecture**. American democracy can tolerate enormous policy reversals only while power remains temporary [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-democracy-temporary-power): one administration governs, another replaces it, Congress changes hands, judicial decisions constrain both, bureaucracies persist, states retain powers, citizens organize against governments, and elections reopen questions that appeared closed. Advanced machine intelligence introduces a potentially destabilizing asymmetry into that arrangement because a temporary political majority may inherit technical capacities unavailable to every previous government in American history. If machine intelligence becomes deeply integrated into the machinery of the state, the constitutional question will no longer be merely which party wins an election, but whether any party can convert temporary electoral authority into a durable computational advantage over its opposition. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-electoral-power-computational-advantage) The scientific literature already gives reasons to take that problem seriously without imagining omnipotent mind control. In controlled experiments, large language models have demonstrably altered attitudes on politically contentious policy questions, and a 2025 preregistered study found that GPT-4 supplied with personal information could outperform human conversational opponents in persuasion under experimental conditions. [Nature](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61345-5?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Research in _Nature Human Behaviour_ now treats advanced AI as potentially affecting democracy at three separate levels: **epistemic**, by changing how citizens acquire and evaluate political information; **material**, by changing how elections and democratic institutions function; and **foundational**, by affecting principles such as autonomy, equality and legitimate political participation. [Nature](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02309-z?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Meanwhile, the 2026 American campaign already contains large numbers of AI-generated or AI-enhanced political advertisements, while peer-reviewed research on digital authoritarianism documents the use of generative AI by political elites in weakened democracies for scalable propaganda. [Springer](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41358-026-00457-w?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Machine intelligence does not need to turn voters into puppets to threaten democracy; it need only collapse the marginal cost of individualized persuasion, monitoring, and response. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-ai-democracy-persuasion-cost) That is the domestic analogue of Putin’s argument. If leadership in machine intelligence can confer disproportionate power internationally, then institutional command of machine intelligence can confer disproportionate power inside a state as well. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-intelligence-state-power) Imagine not one propaganda office writing one message for ten million people, but millions of personalized interlocutors capable of remembering individual histories, adjusting arguments continuously, experimenting with language, synthesizing government records, predicting reactions and operating across every major communications channel. Imagine tax enforcement, benefits eligibility, border administration, regulatory inspections, investigations and public information systems all becoming computationally coordinated. Imagine the same capability in defensive hands, protecting citizens from fraud, foreign influence, cyberattack and bureaucratic error. Machine intelligence does not decide whether its power becomes protective or coercive; constitutional structure determines who can direct that power and which constraints survive its deployment. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-constitution-ai-protects-coerces) The 2026 midterm election is therefore consequential, but it is better understood as the **constitutional and infrastructural prelude to the far more consequential 2028 transfer of executive power**. The Congress seated in January 2027 will legislate, appropriate funds, investigate executive activity, confirm senior officials and judges through the Senate, and help determine the legal architecture governing federal compute, model procurement, intelligence systems, autonomous defense, immigration technology, cybersecurity, data infrastructure, and the rapidly expanding integration of machine intelligence into government. Congress’s investigative authority has historically functioned as an essential restraint upon executive power, while the Senate exercises constitutionally significant authority over appointments and treaties. [U.S. Senate](https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Those responsibilities become qualitatively more important when the executive branch itself has formally declared an **“era of Super Intelligence,”** directed federal agencies to adopt that terminology, and begun integrating SI into government-service infrastructure such as America.gov. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inaugurating-the-era-of-super-intelligence/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The midterms therefore help determine the institutional rules, appropriations, oversight mechanisms, appointments, and technological infrastructure that will already be in place when Americans choose the next president; they are not the endpoint of the political struggle but the period during which much of the machinery that the next administration will inherit is being constructed. A midterm election does more than distribute seats in Congress; it can determine the machinery of government the next president inherits. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-midterms-government-inheritance) **The deeper constitutional inflection point arrives in 2028**, because the president inaugurated on January 20, 2029 will ordinarily control the executive branch until January 20, 2033, an entire four-year interval during which machine intelligence could advance by several technological generations. The Constitution fixes that four-year transfer cycle, but technological capability does not wait for it. [Constitution.gov](https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Stanford’s 2026 AI Index reports that frontier systems gained roughly thirty percentage points on Humanity’s Last Exam in a single year, that difficult benchmarks are being saturated within months, that coding performance on SWE-bench Verified moved from about 60 percent toward the human-performance ceiling in one year, and that agentic systems made similarly dramatic gains on computer-use tasks. [Stanford HAI](https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report/technical-performance?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Extrapolating those curves four years forward cannot tell us exactly what systems will exist in 2032, but it does establish why treating 2028 as an ordinary presidential election would be strategically naïve: the incoming administration may govern during the period in which machine intelligence moves from powerful administrative assistance toward pervasive integration with intelligence analysis, military autonomy, scientific research, public communication, regulatory enforcement, border administration, economic coordination, and the digital interfaces through which citizens interact with the state. When machine intelligence inside the state advances faster than the safeguards that constrain it, a temporary electoral victory can harden into durable computational incumbency. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-electoral-victory-computational-incumbency) The civilizational question surrounding 2028 is therefore larger than which party wins the presidency: it is whether the United States can enter the 2029–2033 superintelligence interval with enough external technological power to remain sovereign while preserving enough internal constitutional structure that no governing coalition—Republican, Democratic, or otherwise—can convert four years of executive control into an effectively permanent command of the machinery through which future political competition is conducted. Both camps explicitly describe China as a strategic AI competitor, but they now disagree much more profoundly over **how technological supremacy is preserved and what risks justify slowing or constraining frontier development**. The Trump administration has institutionalized an acceleration strategy centered on rapid frontier-model adoption across the national-security enterprise, massive compute and energy buildout, commercial integration, regulatory reduction, and the explicit maintenance of technological “overmatch” against strategic competitors. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/06/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-signs-historic-directive-on-ai-in-the-national-security-enterprise/?query-11-page=5&trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block&utm_source=chatgpt.com) Democratic leadership does not reject the premise of an AI race with China—Schumer has repeatedly argued in September 2026 that America must preserve its lead and deny China access to the most advanced American chips and semiconductor-manufacturing equipment—but he has simultaneously demanded stronger federal guardrails, classified congressional oversight, and responses to potentially catastrophic frontier-model risks, explicitly criticizing the administration for permitting development to proceed without sufficient controls. [Senate Democratic Leadership](https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leader-schumer-floor-remarks-calling-on-trump-to-restrict-chinas-access-to-americas-advanced-ai-chips?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The disagreement is therefore no longer adequately described as merely different emphases within a common AI policy. The central dispute in American AI policy is no longer whether technological supremacy matters, but whether it is best preserved by accelerating capability, infrastructure, deployment, and allied integration or by imposing stronger restrictions on frontier development, deployment, and access. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-american-ai-supremacy-dispute) That distinction matters enormously in an article concerned with the 2028–2033 window, because these approaches could produce very different institutional architectures by the time the next presidential administration inherits a federal government increasingly organized around superintelligence. Pax Silica makes that distinction even clearer. The initiative launched by the State Department is not merely a defense agreement or another version of NATO; it is an attempt to organize a trusted technological and industrial ecosystem spanning **critical minerals, energy inputs, advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, AI infrastructure and logistics**. By June 2026 it had grown to twenty-four signatories, while approximately three dozen economies had signed an AI Opportunity statement associated with the framework. [EBS PublicNow](https://ebs.publicnow.com/view/4BFCA069838BA31827FC1B5D6217C610EA5B54C7?utm_source=chatgpt.com) In congressional testimony, Under Secretary Jacob Helberg described Pax Silica in explicitly sovereignty-oriented language, arguing that industrial capacity, logistics, trusted infrastructure and aligned AI policy should become the connective tissue of a new technological coalition stretching through allied manufacturing and supply chains. He made the extraordinary observation that the framework had already placed Qatar and Israel inside the same economic architecture, describing shared supply chains as potentially more binding than shared ideology. [House of Representatives](https://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA00/20260224/118902/HHRG-119-FA00-Wstate-HelbergJ-20260224.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Pax Silica is much closer to a machine-age alliance system than to a conventional trade agreement. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-pax-silica-machine-age-alliance)  Israel occupies an important position inside that architecture for reasons extending considerably beyond missiles and territorial security. Israel joined Pax Silica at its inception and in January 2026 entered a strategic U.S.–Israel framework centered specifically on artificial intelligence, research and critical technologies. [Ministry of Foreign Affairs](https://embassies.gov.il/boston/en/news/israel-joins-pax-silica-initiative-312202?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Israel’s own 2026 national AI strategy explicitly describes global AI alliances as an architecture still being built and recommends deeper U.S. cooperation, joint research, industrial partnerships and systematic AI relationships across the Abraham Accords. [Israel Innovation Authority](https://innovationisrael.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/AI-Strategy-2026-ENG.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Seen through a Pax Silica framework, Israel is therefore not merely a Middle Eastern security client. It is a technologically dense node in an emerging network involving semiconductors, cybersecurity, advanced science, military technology, AI, entrepreneurship and allied supply-chain integration. American disagreement over Israel is no longer adequately understood as a dispute over Gaza, Netanyahu, foreign aid, or even conventional Middle Eastern strategy, because the Trump administration has formally embedded Israel inside the emerging **technological-security architecture of the AI era**. The January 16, 2026 U.S.–Israel Joint Statement calls the bilateral relationship a **“cornerstone of the Pax Silica partnership,”** establishes cooperation across artificial intelligence, advanced computing, semiconductors, energy, space and sensitive-technology protection, and explicitly integrates Israel’s research and technological ecosystem as a secure **“Pax Silica node.”** [PublicNow](https://www.publicnow.com/view/EF11D0EC8F1AC583E73F4B6E1FE06452D086F494?utm_source=chatgpt.com) U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee went further, stating that America has many friends and allies but **“only one true partner in Israel,”** while Under Secretary Jacob Helberg described the purpose of Pax Silica as uniting the American and Israeli innovation ecosystems so that strong and sovereign allies shape the future of AI and robotics; Israel’s government describes the wider project as nothing less than a new sustainable economic order for the age of artificial intelligence, spanning critical minerals, energy, advanced manufacturing, chips, data centers, foundational models and logistics. [Ministry of Foreign Affairs](https://embassies.gov.il/nepal/en/node/9937?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Within the Pax Silica framework, Israel functions not merely as a protected ally but as a forward technological node inside an American-led strategic system, supplying unusually dense concentrations of research, cyber capability, advanced engineering, defense innovation, and entrepreneurial capacity while the United States supplies continental industrial scale, capital, compute, logistics, and global deterrence. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-israel-forward-pax-silica-node) American policies that materially sever U.S.–Israel technological integration would do more than alter Middle East diplomacy; they would weaken a technological coalition being assembled to preserve American sovereignty and competitive capacity in the machine-intelligence era. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-us-israel-technology-coalition) Foreign-policy architecture survives only as long as an electoral coalition is willing to sustain it. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-foreign-policy-electoral-coalitions) Public opinion already shows a profound partisan divergence: in Pew’s May 2026 survey, **65 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents viewed the Israeli people favorably, compared with 43 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners; the corresponding numbers for the Israeli government were 51 percent and 16 percent**, respectively. [Pew Research Center](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/07/09/americans-views-of-israelis-have-grown-increasingly-negative-but-views-of-palestinians-have-held-fairly-steady/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Immigration, naturalization, generational replacement, religious affiliation, ethnic identity and ideological socialization can all alter electoral coalitions over decades, and therefore can indirectly alter whether future American governments continue particular strategic alliances; that is an ordinary consequence of democratic demography, not an exotic theory. Noncitizens are legally prohibited from voting in federal elections under **18 U.S.C. §611**, so claims that a party is literally importing noncitizens to cast federal ballots require evidence beyond disagreement over immigration or voter-identification policy, although newly naturalized citizens plainly acquire the same political rights as other citizens and can reshape electoral coalitions like every other demographic cohort. [Legal Information Institute](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The strategically relevant question is therefore broader and harder: if an American electoral coalition eventually becomes sufficiently hostile to the U.S.–Israel technological partnership that it uses congressional appropriations, export controls, procurement authority, treaty politics or regulatory power to dismantle that integration, the consequence would not merely be a symbolic change in attitudes toward Israel; under the present administration’s Pax Silica architecture, it would alter the composition of the **American-led AI, semiconductor, robotics and critical-technology bloc itself**, precisely when those technologies are becoming instruments of national power on the scale Putin anticipated. Demography is not background noise in a civilizational analysis: population composition eventually becomes political composition, and political composition influences which institutions, borders, alliances, religious accommodations, strategic commitments, and historical narratives a democracy sustains across generations. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-population-political-composition) Immigration policy is consequently not merely a labor-market instrument; over sufficiently long periods it affects citizenship, electorate formation, assimilation, religious composition, ethnic continuity, and foreign-policy preferences. The Democratic National Committee currently describes its preferred immigration regime as combining pathways to citizenship with border security, while the Trump administration has pursued substantially more restrictive enforcement and detention policies, including a mandatory-detention interpretation now accepted for Supreme Court review. [Democrats](https://democrats.org/dnc-statement-on-daca-anniversary-2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Those differences become considerably more consequential in an AI-mediated state because identity verification, visa adjudication, border surveillance, naturalization administration, fraud detection, deportation logistics, and eventually large portions of immigration governance can be made faster and more scalable through machine intelligence. A civilization deciding who may enter, who may become a citizen, how rapidly newcomers are incorporated, and what degree of cultural assimilation it expects is ultimately deciding the composition of its own future population. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-civilization-future-population) Advanced machine intelligence magnifies the administrative capacity with which whichever government is in power can implement those decisions. One of the least appreciated consequences of the humanoid-robot buildout is that it may fundamentally change the demographic choices available to aging, below-replacement societies. Musk now predicts **well over one billion humanoid robots globally within roughly a decade**, while estimating that each mature robot could eventually produce several times the output of a human worker; whatever the eventual number or timetable, the underlying proposition is that physical labor itself is becoming computationally scalable. [Yahoo Tech](https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/articles/elon-musk-says-robots-could-214204534.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com) For societies confronting persistent labor shortages because their populations are not reproducing at replacement rates, that creates an option that scarcely existed before: **missing labor can increasingly be supplied by machines rather than necessarily by demographic replacement through immigration**. This does not establish that preservation of cultural, ethnic, or national continuity is the motive for which humanoid robots are being developed, but it does mean robotics can function as a technology of **demographic autonomy**, allowing societies that place value on continuity of population and culture to sustain agriculture, manufacturing, logistics, construction, elder care, and other labor-intensive systems without requiring a one-for-one replacement of every missing worker with another human being. At the outer edge of this transition lies the larger machine-succession question developed elsewhere in my work: these systems may eventually become more than substitutes for biological labor and instead become carriers of accumulated human knowledge, memory, culture, and productive intelligence beyond the demographic limits of the populations that created them. Religion is one of humanity’s most durable mechanisms of intergenerational identity transmission, carrying moral codes, historical narratives, political loyalties, marriage norms, collective grievances, and conceptions of legitimate authority across centuries. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-religion-intergenerational-identity) The attempted destruction of flydubai Flight FZ1073 demonstrates why political-religious radicalization remains a concrete national-security variable: Israeli officials said the Omani co-pilot stabbed the captain and attempted to crash the Israel-bound aircraft, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu subsequently said available information indicated that the attacker had undergone radical Islamist indoctrination; investigators were still determining motive and whether any organization was involved. [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/diverted-flydubai-flight-israel-was-not-hijacking-incident-israeli-prime-2026-09-30/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The analytically important distinction is between ordinary Muslim religious identity and **violent Islamist extremism capable of translating ideological commitment into coercion or mass-casualty action**. A state incapable of distinguishing peaceful religious identity from violent religious extremism risks one of two serious errors: ignoring a genuine ideological security threat or indiscriminately treating peaceful populations as though they constituted that threat, thereby damaging the social cohesion national-security policy is supposed to preserve. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-religion-violent-extremism) Machine intelligence multiplies these stakes because it magnifies both **offensive ideological capability and defensive state capability**. Extremist organizations can use advanced models for recruitment, multilingual propaganda, reconnaissance, cyber operations, target research, synthetic media, and operational planning, while governments can employ related technologies for network analysis, anomaly detection, linguistic triage, intelligence fusion, cyber defense, threat assessment, and increasingly autonomous response. The Pentagon’s creation of the new **Autonomous Warfare Command** makes the transition institutional rather than hypothetical: the command is intended to accelerate autonomous and robotic capabilities throughout the U.S. military as AI, inexpensive compute, drones, and advanced manufacturing reshape warfare. [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/pentagon-creates-autowarcom-expand-ai-drone-capabilities-2026-09-30/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Putin’s 2017 observation therefore becomes more concrete with each technological generation: superior machine intelligence can permit a civilization to observe more comprehensively, decide more rapidly, coordinate more systems simultaneously, defend larger informational and physical surfaces, and convert strategic intention into executable capacity at a speed unavailable to an opponent operating primarily through human institutions. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-intelligence-executable-capacity) The deepest domestic danger of machine intelligence is not merely that an administration might misuse it, but that a political faction could use machine-mediated administrative, informational, economic, and security power to convert temporary electoral victory into durable political dominance long after the election that authorized it has passed. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-political-dominance) Under the current Pax Silica framework, the United States and Israel have already formalized cooperation across AI, robotics, semiconductors, advanced computing, energy, space, sensitive-technology protection, research, and supply-chain security, with Israel explicitly designated as a secure **Pax Silica node** inside an American-led technological ecosystem. [Ministry of Foreign Affairs](https://embassies.gov.il/nepal/en/node/9937?utm_source=chatgpt.com) If any governing coalition eventually possessed machine systems powerful enough to dominate political communication, administrative selection, surveillance, regulatory enforcement, benefits distribution, immigration processing, intelligence prioritization, and institutional memory, while simultaneously weakening or dismantling such strategic alignments, such as the alignment between America and Israel, the danger would be far greater than an ordinary four-year policy reversal: it would approach **machine-enabled political entrenchment coupled to civilizational realignment**. The constitutional problem is therefore severe and immediate in principle: whichever political movement controls increasingly capable state intelligence must remain genuinely removable by the electorate, because the moment superintelligence becomes a mechanism through which a temporary governing coalition can prevent meaningful political succession, the republic has crossed from using machine intelligence as an instrument of government into allowing machine intelligence to become an instrument for making a particular government faction permanent. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-superintelligence-government-faction-permanent) Putin’s warning therefore deserves one final reinterpretation. The civilization that masters superintelligence may acquire extraordinary leverage over civilizations that do not, but inside every civilization lies an equally consequential struggle over **who controls the intelligence, whose values constrain it, whose history it preserves, which alliances it strengthens or dismantles, which institutions it serves, and whether political power can still be transferred peacefully once machine intelligence has become inseparable from the machinery of the state**. The central constitutional question of superintelligence is no longer merely which political faction inherits it first, but whether constitutional succession itself survives the inheritance. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-constitutional-succession-superintelligence) A governing coalition able to convert machine intelligence into permanent informational, administrative, economic, and security dominance could transform an ordinary electoral victory into something qualitatively different: **a durable monopoly over the mechanisms through which political power is reproduced**. A republic remains a republic only so long as its governing coalition can genuinely lose, its strategic architecture can be debated without being algorithmically foreclosed, and no administration can use superior machine capability to make itself effectively irremovable. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-republic-government-can-lose) The defining political problem of the superintelligence era is therefore stark: the United States must become powerful enough in machine intelligence to remain sovereign against external rivals while remaining constitutionally disciplined enough that no internal faction can use that same power to become sovereign over the United States itself. [∴](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-american-ai-external-internal-sovereignty) * * * [Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/about) is a Wall Street Journal and USA Today bestselling author, systems architect, technologist, and strategic advisor, as well as a Congressionally Recognized Ambassador of Goodwill and United Nations–appointed Global Champion. His work spans naval intelligence systems, computational linguistics, artificial intelligence, digital transformation, and civilizational governance architecture. His forward analysis on U.S.–Israel Pax Silica frameworks has appeared in Jewish/Jerusalem News Syndicate (JNS). * * * # References These references correspond to the principal factual, governmental, legal, strategic, and scholarly claims in the article as it currently stands. Associated Press. 2017. “Putin: Leader in Artificial Intelligence Will Rule World.” September 1, 2017. Contemporaneous reporting of Vladimir Putin’s September 2017 remarks on AI leadership, strategic monopoly, autonomous warfare, and global power. [C4ISRNet](https://www.c4isrnet.com/international/2017/09/01/putin-leader-in-artificial-intelligence-will-rule-world/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Beacken, Gabrielle D., Inga K. Trauthig, and Samuel C. Woolley. 2026. “Generative AI, Propaganda, and Digital Authoritarianism: Comparative Insights from Six Democratically Weakened Countries.” _Big Data & Society_. doi:10.1177/20539517251410064. [DOI](https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251410064?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2026. “Technofascism: AI, Big Tech, and the New Authoritarianism.” _AI & Society_ 41: 5163–5176. doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02862-9. [Springer](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-02862-9?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Democratic National Committee. 2026. “DNC Statement on DACA Anniversary.” June 15, 2026. Official statement describing Democratic immigration policy in terms of pathways to citizenship, border security, and protections for immigrants. [Democrats](https://democrats.org/dnc-statement-on-daca-anniversary-2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Dorsch, John, Mark Coeckelbergh, and Tillmann Vierkant. 2026. “Does AI Undermine Democratic Deliberation? How Engagement Algorithms Hijack Epistemic Agency.” _Synthese_ 208, article 164. doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05820-6. [Springer](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-026-05820-6?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Executive Office of the President. 2025. _America’s AI Action Plan_. Washington, DC: The White House. The administration’s strategic framework for accelerating American AI capability, infrastructure, energy development, national-security adoption, and technological leadership. Helberg, Jacob. 2026. “Signing of the U.S.-Israel Joint Statement: Pax Silica Framework.” Remarks at the City of David, Jerusalem, January 16, 2026. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs. The remarks explicitly identify AI, semiconductors, robotics, energy, materials science, and space as foundations of national strength within the U.S.–Israel Pax Silica relationship. [GovDelivery](https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/USSTATEBPA/2026/01/16/file_attachments/3525589/E%20Remarks%20-%20Building%20the%20Future%20Pax%20Silica%20Framework%20-%2016%20JAN%2026.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Israel Innovation Authority. 2026. _National AI Strategy for Israeli High-Tech 2026_. Jerusalem: Israel Innovation Authority. The strategy addresses global AI alliances, research capacity, infrastructure, industrial development, human capital, and deeper technological cooperation with the United States. [Israel Innovation Authority](https://innovationisrael.org.il/document/ai-strategy-2026/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2025. “Israel Joins Pax Silica Initiative.” December 13, 2025. Describes Pax Silica as a U.S.-led technological ecosystem spanning critical minerals, energy, advanced manufacturing, chips, AI infrastructure, data centers, foundational models, telecommunications, and logistics. [Ministry of Foreign Affairs](https://embassies.gov.il/boston/en/news/israel-joins-pax-silica-initiative-312202?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2026. “Israel and the United States Sign Joint Statement on Artificial Intelligence—Israel Is the First Country to Sign a Joint Statement in This Field with the U.S.” January 16, 2026. Includes statements by Gideon Sa’ar, Erez Eskel, Jacob Helberg, and Ambassador Mike Huckabee and details cooperation in AI, semiconductors, robotics, advanced computing, energy, space, research security, and supply chains. [Ministry of Foreign Affairs](https://embassies.gov.il/nepal/en/node/9937?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2026. “Israel and the U.S. Launch a Strategic Partnership in AI.” January 2026. Describes integration of Israel’s research and technological ecosystem as a secure **Pax Silica node** and enumerates bilateral cooperation in AI, robotics, semiconductors, space, energy, and sensitive-technology protection. [Ministry of Foreign Affairs](https://embassies.gov.il/usa/en/node/9950?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Kruschinski, Simon, and Fabio Votta. 2026. “Efficiency Tool or Manipulation Machine? Assessing Dominant Claims about the Quantity, Quality, and Persuasive Power of Visual Generative AI in Political Campaigns.” _Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft_ 36: 79–89. doi:10.1007/s41358-026-00457-w. [Springer](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41358-026-00457-w?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Pew Research Center. 2026. “Americans Now Have Increasingly Negative Views of Israelis as Views of Palestinians Hold Steady.” July 9, 2026. Based on a May 4–17 national survey; documents large partisan differences in attitudes toward the Israeli people, Israeli government, Palestinian people, Palestinian Authority, and Hamas. [Pew Research Center](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/07/09/americans-views-of-israelis-have-grown-increasingly-negative-but-views-of-palestinians-have-held-fairly-steady/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Reuters. 2026. “Passengers Foil Bid to Crash Dubai-Tel Aviv Flight, Israel Says, after Co-Pilot Stabs Pilot.” September 30, 2026. Contemporary reporting on flydubai Flight FZ1073 and the attempted destruction of the Israel-bound aircraft. [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/diverted-flydubai-flight-israel-was-not-hijacking-incident-israeli-prime-2026-09-30/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Reuters. 2026. “Israel’s Netanyahu: Co-Pilot of Flydubai Plane Underwent Radical Islamist Indoctrination.” October 1, 2026. Reports Netanyahu’s characterization of the attacker’s radicalization while noting that motive and organizational involvement remained under investigation. [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-vows-get-root-flydubai-attack-uae-launches-investigation-2026-10-01/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Reuters. 2026. “Pentagon Creates ‘Autowarcom’ to Expand AI and Drone Capabilities.” September 30, 2026. Reports establishment of the four-star Autonomous Warfare Command and the Pentagon’s effort to integrate autonomous systems, robotics, AI, and inexpensive precision systems throughout the force. [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/pentagon-creates-autowarcom-expand-ai-drone-capabilities-2026-09-30/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Reuters. 2026. “Supreme Court to Weigh Trump’s Mandatory Immigration Detention Policy.” October 1, 2026. Reports Supreme Court review of the administration’s policy requiring detention without bond for certain immigrants in removal proceedings. [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-supreme-court-hear-clash-over-trumps-immigration-detention-policy-2026-10-01/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Salvi, Francesco, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Riccardo Gallotti, and Robert West. 2025. “On the Conversational Persuasiveness of GPT-4.” _Nature Human Behaviour_ 9: 1645–1653. doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02194-6. The preregistered experiment found that personalized GPT-4 opponents were more persuasive than human opponents in the experimental setting when the two were not equally persuasive. [Nature](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02194-6?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Schumer, Charles E. 2026. “Leader Schumer Floor Remarks Demanding the Trump Administration Brief Senators on the Dangers of Unchecked AI.” U.S. Senate Democratic Caucus, September 14, 2026. Calls for classified congressional oversight, stronger frontier-AI guardrails, protection of critical institutions, and restrictions on Chinese access to advanced American AI chips. [Senate Democratic Leadership](https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leader-schumer-floor-remarks-demanding-the-trump-administration-brief-senators-on-the-dangers-of-unchecked-ai?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Schumer, Charles E. 2026. “Leader Schumer Floor Remarks Calling on Trump to Restrict China’s Access to America’s Advanced AI Chips.” U.S. Senate Democratic Caucus, September 17, 2026. Argues explicitly that the United States must preserve its AI lead while restricting Chinese access to advanced accelerators and semiconductor-manufacturing equipment. [Senate Democratic Leadership](https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leader-schumer-floor-remarks-calling-on-trump-to-restrict-chinas-access-to-americas-advanced-ai-chips?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Schumer, Charles E. 2026. “Leader Schumer Floor Remarks Urging Trump Not to Capitulate to Xi Jinping and the CCP.” U.S. Senate Democratic Caucus, September 23, 2026. Addresses AI leadership, advanced-chip export controls, semiconductor-manufacturing equipment, and U.S.–China technological competition. [Senate Democratic Leadership](https://www.democrats.senate.gov/news/press-releases/leader-schumer-floor-remarks-urging-trump-not-to-capitulate-to-xi-jinping-and-the-ccp?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Sparrow, Robert. 2026. “Slaves to the Algorithms? Algocracy and Republican Liberty.” _AI and Ethics_ 6, article 374. doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01171-7. Examines government reliance on AI, contestability, arbitrary power, civic liberty, and the possibility that advanced AI could materially strengthen governments relative to their citizens. [Springer](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01171-7?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. 2026. _AI Index Report 2026_. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Particularly relevant is the Technical Performance chapter documenting approximately thirty percentage points of one-year improvement on Humanity’s Last Exam, rapid benchmark saturation, narrowing frontier-model performance gaps, and advances in coding and agentic systems. [Stanford HAI](https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report/technical-performance?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Summerfield, Christopher, Lisa P. Argyle, Michiel Bakker, et al. 2025. “The Impact of Advanced AI Systems on Democracy.” _Nature Human Behaviour_ 9: 2420–2430. doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02309-z. Develops the useful distinction among **epistemic**, **material**, and **foundational** effects of advanced AI on democratic societies. [Nature](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02309-z?utm_source=chatgpt.com) United States Code. 2024 ed. Title 18, §611, “Voting by Aliens.” U.S. Government Publishing Office. Establishes the federal prohibition on noncitizen voting in federal elections, subject to the statutory exceptions specified in the section. [GovInfo](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title18/html/USCODE-2024-title18-partI-chap29-sec611.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) U.S. Constitution. Article II, §1, cl. 1; Amendment XX, §1. _Constitution Annotated_, Library of Congress. Article II establishes the four-year presidential term, while the Twentieth Amendment specifies that presidential and vice-presidential terms begin and end at noon on January 20. [Constitution.gov](https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) U.S. Department of State. 2026. “Pax Silica.” Updated following the 2026 Pax Silica Summit. Reports expansion of Pax Silica to twenty-four signatories and approximately three dozen participants in the associated AI Opportunity Statement. [EBS PublicNow](https://ebs.publicnow.com/view/4BFCA069838BA31827FC1B5D6217C610EA5B54C7?utm_source=chatgpt.com) U.S. Senate. 2026. “Powers and Procedures.” Senate Historical Office. Covers congressional investigation as a mechanism for restraining government, Senate advice and consent on nominations, legislative procedure, and the Senate’s constitutional treaty role. [U.S. Senate](https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Villasenor, John. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Geopolitics.” Brookings Institution, November 14, 2018. Discusses Putin’s 2017 AI statement in the context of technological competition, geopolitics, national power, and global leadership. [Brookings](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-geopolitics/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The White House. 2026. “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Signs Historic Directive on AI in the National Security Enterprise.” June 5, 2026. Describes accelerated adoption of frontier systems, high-security computing facilities, multi-vendor model procurement, accountability under the constitutional chain of command, and an AI National Security Strategic Reserve. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/06/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-signs-historic-directive-on-ai-in-the-national-security-enterprise/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The White House. 2026. “National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-11: Artificial Intelligence in the National Security Enterprise.” June 5, 2026. Primary presidential directive governing adoption and deployment of advanced AI across the national-security enterprise. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/06/national-security-presidential-memorandum-nspm-11/?trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block&utm_source=chatgpt.com) The White House. 2026. “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence.” Executive Order, September 29, 2026. Directs executive departments and agencies to use **“Super Intelligence”** and **“SI”** in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in specified non-statutory federal contexts while temporarily defining SI through the existing statutory AI definition. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inaugurating-the-era-of-super-intelligence/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The White House. 2026. “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Streamlines Access to Government Services Through America.gov.” September 29, 2026. Describes America.gov as a unified federal-service interface employing Super Intelligence and directs federal agencies to integrate covered public-facing services with the platform. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/09/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-streamlines-access-to-government-services-through-america-gov/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) The White House. 2026. “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Inaugurates the Era of Super Intelligence.” September 29, 2026. Official explanatory document accompanying the executive order establishing the administration’s Super Intelligence terminology. [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/09/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-inaugurates-the-era-of-super-intelligence/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Links to this page [A Republic Requires a Government Capable of Losing by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-republic-government-can-lose) [A State Must Distinguish Peaceful Religion from Violent Extremism by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-religion-violent-extremism) [Agentic AI](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Agentic+AI) [Agentic Empowerment](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Agentic+Empowerment) [AI Does Not Need Puppets to Threaten Democracy by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-ai-democracy-persuasion-cost) [AI Governance](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/AI+Governance) [AI Multiplies the Intentions It Inherits by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-ai-multiplies-inherited-intentions) [AI Superpower](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/AI+Superpower) [AI-Generated Persuasion](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/AI-Generated+Persuasion) [Algorithmic Governance](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Algorithmic+Governance) [Algorithmic State](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Algorithmic+State) [American AI Power Must Preserve External and Internal Sovereignty by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-american-ai-external-internal-sovereignty) [American Constitutional Interest](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/American+Constitutional+Interest) [Artificial Intelligence](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Artificial+Intelligence) [Coalitionary AI Politics](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Coalitionary+AI+Politics) [Computational Governance](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Computational+Governance) [Computational Incumbency](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Computational+Incumbency) [Computational Propaganda](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Computational+Propaganda) [Constitutional Safeguards](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Constitutional+Safeguards) [Constitutional Structure Decides Whether AI Protects or Coerces by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-constitution-ai-protects-coerces) [Constitutional Succession](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Constitutional+Succession) [Constitutional Succession Must Survive Superintelligence by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-constitutional-succession-superintelligence) [Contemporary Civilization](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Contemporary+Civilization) [Countering Violent Extremism](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Countering+Violent+Extremism) [Democracy Depends on Power Remaining Temporary by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-democracy-temporary-power) [Democratic Deliberation](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Democratic+Deliberation) [Democratic Process](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Democratic+Process) [Democratic Succession](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Democratic+Succession) [Electoral Victory Can Harden into Computational Incumbency by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-electoral-victory-computational-incumbency) [Foreign Policy Architecture Depends on Electoral Coalitions by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-foreign-policy-electoral-coalitions) [Government Removability](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Government+Removability) [Immigration and Assimilation Shape a Civilization's Future Population by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-civilization-future-population) [Infrastructural Power](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Infrastructural+Power) [Infrastructural Superintelligence](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Infrastructural+Superintelligence) [Instrumented Alliance](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Instrumented+Alliance) [Intention Multiplier](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Intention+Multiplier) [Intergenerational Governance](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Intergenerational+Governance) [Israel Is a Forward Technological Node in Pax Silica by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-israel-forward-pax-silica-node) [Machine Intelligence](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Machine+Intelligence) [Machine Intelligence Becomes the Nervous System of Government by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-government-machine-intelligence-nervous-system) [Machine Intelligence Can Extend Political Dominance Beyond an Election by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-political-dominance) [Machine Intelligence Compresses Intention into Capability by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-intelligence-intention-capability) [Machine Intelligence Creates Power Inside the State by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-intelligence-state-power) [Machine-Age Alliance System](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Machine-Age+Alliance+System) [Midterm Elections Build the Machinery the Next President Inherits by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-midterms-government-inheritance) [National Security Architecture](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/National+Security+Architecture) [Pax Silica](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Pax+Silica) [Pax Silica Is a Machine-Age Alliance System by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-pax-silica-machine-age-alliance) [Permanent Government](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Permanent+Government) [Political Demography](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Political+Demography) [Population Composition Becomes Political Composition by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-population-political-composition) [Population Dynamics](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Population+Dynamics) [Religion Carries Identity Across Generations by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-religion-intergenerational-identity) [Religious Identity Transmission](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Religious+Identity+Transmission) [Severing US-Israel Technology Integration Weakens the AI Coalition by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-us-israel-technology-coalition) [Superintelligence](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Superintelligence) [Superintelligence Can Make a Government Faction Permanent by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-superintelligence-government-faction-permanent) [Superior Machine Intelligence Converts Strategy into Executable Capacity by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-machine-intelligence-executable-capacity) [Technological Patriotism](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Technological+Patriotism) [Technological Sovereignty](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Technological+Sovereignty) [Temporary Electoral Power Can Become Computational Advantage by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-electoral-power-computational-advantage) [The American AI Dispute Is About How Supremacy Is Preserved by Bryant McGill](https://bryantmcgill.com/simple-reminders-bryant-mcgill-american-ai-supremacy-dispute) [The Gigawatt Is the New Measure of War](https://bryantmcgill.com/article-the-gigawatt-is-the-new-measure-of-war) [US-Israel AI Superpower](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/US-Israel+AI+Superpower) [US-Israel Leadership Alliance](https://bryantmcgill.com/collection-us-israel-leadership) [US-Israel Technology Integration](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/US-Israel+Technology+Integration) [Violent Extremism](https://bryantmcgill.com/wiki/Violent+Extremism) [welcome](https://bryantmcgill.com/welcome)