Climate & Meritocracy: How Public Weather Data Became Private Risk Scores

Bryant McGill · Climate and Meritocracy: Public Data Became Private Risk Scores

*Public climate infrastructure built with equity framing has been commercialized at planetary scale without binding reciprocity mechanisms, creating a \$2T private market while multilateral equity programs were defunded.* ## PREFACE Nicole Shanahan’s recent disclosures have sent shockwaves through the philanthropic and technology worlds, not because she revealed something entirely new, but because someone from *inside the apex of that system* finally admitted what many have sensed for years: the Great Reset was never merely a slogan or a policy bundle—it was a psychological and financial scaffolding built to conscript elite goodwill into a global restructuring they did not fully understand. In four minutes of unguarded clarity, Shanahan described how Silicon Valley’s philanthropic class—particularly its progressive women—were guided, incentivized, and emotionally engineered into supporting a transformation whose outcomes bore little resemblance to the moral narratives used to recruit them. She spoke of “useful idiots,” not as an insult, but as a painful recognition of how deeply she believed she was helping marginalized communities, only to discover the metrics worsened across every dimension she cared about. But her disclosures, powerful as they are, hover in the realm of personal experience—stories of Davos rooms, NGO advisors, philanthropic circuits, and the emotional levers used to bind wealthy progressives into ideological service. What she cannot name, and perhaps cannot yet fully see, is the *machine behind the theater.* The “Great Reset” was never the true center of gravity. It was the narrative wrapper—an equity-themed aesthetic front end—sitting atop a vastly more consequential system: the planetary sensing, scoring, and financialization architecture built quietly between 2009 and 2025 through federal mandates, satellite infrastructure, open-data laws, private cloud agreements, and risk-pricing algorithms that now determine real economic outcomes at global scale. That is the decoding work I am attempting to do for the public. Shanahan’s story identifies the emotional and ideological gateway, but it does not explain what that gateway was opening into. Her position inside philanthropy gave her a partial view of the *narrative layer*, not the substrate beneath it. She saw the rhetoric—climate justice, inclusive capitalism, ESG morality—but not the deeper cybernetic system that was being assembled in parallel: NOAA’s open-data migration to AWS; the OSTP mandate requiring machine-readable public data; climate-risk scoring models built by insurers and sovereign lenders; the collapse of the equity apparatus in 2025; and the seamless continuation of the sensing grid even after the justice and multilateral layers were politically terminated. This is why her confession resonates, but also why it feels incomplete. She names the manipulation but not the mechanism; the co-optation but not the architecture; the psychological capture but not the planetary ledger that ultimately inherited all those inputs. She is describing the *front-facing user interface* of a transition she cannot yet map. The collapse of ESG, the failures of climate justice spending, the philanthropic wash cycles—all of it is real, but these are symptoms, not structure. The real structure is the emergence of a **climate meritocracy**, in which public climate data—funded by taxpayers and framed as tools of equity—has been transformed into the backbone of a multi-trillion-dollar private risk-pricing engine owned by insurers, hedge funds, sovereign-rating desks, and AI-financial systems like Palantir and xAI. That is the difference between her revelations and the analysis I am presenting. She speaks from *inside the scandal*. I am mapping *the system*. Her vantage point reveals betrayal; mine reveals inevitability. She focuses on personalities—the “tech wife mafia,” the NGO intermediaries, Davos social circuits. My focus is on infrastructure: satellites, datasets, licensing regimes, budget tables, cloud architectures, and risk pipelines. She is mourning the collapse of a moral narrative. I am documenting the quiet persistence—and privatization—of the computational core that narrative once concealed. In that sense, Shanahan is a signal, not a map. A data point, not a model. Her courage in telling the truth provides the emotional ignition necessary for the public to look again, to realize something vast shifted beneath their feet. But the real story is not about her or any other individual. It is about the emergence of a new planetary operating system—one that no longer relies on moralistic rhetoric or philanthropic theater, but on real-time climate data, actuarial mathematics, and AI-driven sovereign scoring. The narrative fell away; the ledger remained. It is also impossible to ignore the timing of Shanahan’s disclosures. Had she voiced these critiques in 2020, 2021, or even mid-2022, the consequences would have been professionally catastrophic. She would have been exiled from the philanthropic networks she moved in, blacklisted from WEF-adjacent events, framed as anti-science or anti-climate, and dismissed as unstable or conspiratorial. But by late 2024 and into 2025, the entire equity–climate–ESG moral superstructure had already begun collapsing under its own contradictions. DWS had been fined. BlackRock was retreating. State Street exited Net Zero. Vanguard abandoned GFANZ. The WEF was hemorrhaging legitimacy. COP climate financing pledges crumbled. ESG signal-to-noise analyses exposed widespread misrepresentation. Crime, mental health, and poverty metrics worsened despite “historic” equity spending. DOGE dismantled the bureaucratic incentive architecture behind DEI-led governance. The United States quietly withdrew from climate-equity mechanisms altogether. Only once the moral wrapper had disintegrated did it become socially survivable—and perhaps strategically advantageous—for someone of her stature to speak openly. Of course, we cannot know her motives or intentions, and any speculation must remain tempered by that uncertainty. But the timing remains noteworthy and interesting regardless. Her disclosures arrive precisely at the moment when the old narrative has lost the ability to retaliate, and when distancing oneself from its failures carries no institutional penalty. Whether intentional or not, her intervention functions as a post-collapse autopsy rather than an act of resistance—an insider stepping forward only once the ideological edifice she once supported is no longer defensible. This doesn’t diminish the truth she is telling; it simply contextualizes it. Her voice emerges at the precise moment when the system she is critiquing can no longer punish her for doing so—when the moral stage set has fallen away, leaving the underlying machinery exposed for the first time. What I am doing in this work is translating her shock into structure. Turning her confession into cartography. Decoding, for the public, what she was actually pointing toward: not the collapse of a political project, but the revelation of a global computational apparatus that outlived its storytellers. The Great Reset is over. The climate meritocracy has begun. ## A Simple Story About Public Money and Private Profit Between 2009 and 2017, the United States government built the most sophisticated weather and climate monitoring system in human history. We're talking about satellites that can see the entire planet, radar stations that track every storm, and computer models that can predict climate patterns decades into the future. Taxpayers paid for all of it—about \$39 billion over those years. The government framed this investment in the language of justice and equity. Officials talked about helping vulnerable communities prepare for climate change, about making sure poor countries could access the data they needed, about creating a fairer system for dealing with climate disasters. President Obama's science advisor gave speeches about it. The EPA held forums about it. It all sounded very progressive and public-spirited. Here's what actually happened: they put all that data on Amazon's computers, gave it away for free with unlimited commercial re-use rights, and then stepped back while Wall Street built a two-trillion-dollar climate-risk pricing industry on top of it. Today, insurance companies use that free government data to decide what to charge you for homeowner's insurance. Investment firms use it to price bonds for developing countries. Hedge funds use it to bet on crop failures. And none of them pay a dime for access to the data infrastructure that taxpayers funded. In 2025, the U.S. government withdrew from every international climate agreement, stopped funding climate justice programs, and cut the EPA's environmental justice budget by 90%. But they kept funding the satellites. In fact, satellite funding went up. This article explains what happened, how it happened, and why it matters. The detailed document below provides all the evidence. This introduction gives you the story in plain language. ## The Timeline: What Actually Happened **2009-2010: The Foundation** President Obama signs an executive order creating something called the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force. This sounds bureaucratic, but it's important: it was the first time the federal government officially connected climate policy to performance metrics and "economic benefits." In December 2010, the White House holds an Environmental Justice Forum. Five Cabinet secretaries show up. They talk about "climate preparation in vulnerable communities" and link it to clean energy jobs. The message is clear: we're building climate infrastructure, and it's going to serve equity. **2011-2016: Building the Machine** This is when the infrastructure actually gets built. NOAA (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) starts putting weather satellites into orbit. They build the most advanced radar network ever created. They generate terabytes of climate data every single day. But here's the key decision: in April 2015, NOAA signs agreements with Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and IBM to put all this data on their commercial cloud platforms. The agreements explicitly say: no fees, no restrictions, unlimited commercial re-use. At the same time, the EPA launches something called EJSCREEN—an online tool that maps environmental burdens against demographic data. It's designed to show which communities suffer most from pollution and climate impacts. It explicitly references historical discrimination and redlining. **2017-2024: The Commercial Explosion** With all that free government data sitting on Amazon's servers, private companies start building products. Insurance companies create "parametric" policies that automatically pay out when government satellites detect certain conditions. Investment firms build risk models for every country on Earth. Startups create climate-risk scores for real estate portfolios. By 2023, this has become a massive industry. Catastrophe bonds—financial instruments that let investors bet on disasters—grow to \$53 billion. Climate-risk pricing affects \$1.3 trillion in government debt. Conservative estimates put the entire private climate-risk finance sector at \$2 trillion. For context: the government spent \$39 billion building the infrastructure. Private industry built a \$2 trillion market on top of it. That's a 50-to-1 return—for the private companies, not the taxpayers who funded it. **2025: The Pivot** President Trump's second administration withdraws from the Paris Climate Agreement. The U.S. pulls out of the Loss and Damage Fund—an international program designed to help poor countries deal with climate disasters. The government cuts climate justice programs across the board. But the satellites? Funded. The data infrastructure? Expanded. The commercial cloud contracts? Still active. The equity rhetoric is gone. The measurement infrastructure remains. And it's still feeding Wall Street for free. ## What This Actually Means Let's make this concrete. Imagine your homeowner's insurance premium just went up 40%. Your insurance company made that decision based on climate risk models. Those models use NOAA satellite data—the same data you paid for as a taxpayer. The insurance company doesn't pay NOAA for that data. They don't pay Amazon storage fees because Amazon negotiated a sweetheart deal with NOAA that makes them look good for hosting "open data." The only person paying is you—once through taxes to build the satellite system, and again through higher insurance premiums when companies use that data to price risk. Or imagine you live in a developing country. Your government wants to borrow money to build infrastructure. International investors look at climate-risk scores to decide what interest rate to charge. Those scores are based on U.S. government data that was supposed to be part of a fair, multilateral system for dealing with climate change. But the multilateral system was defunded. The data still flows. And now your country pays higher interest rates because of risks quantified by satellites that were sold to the public as tools for climate justice. This isn't about whether climate change is real or whether we should measure it. This is about who benefits from the measurements. ## The People Involved The officials who built this system didn't disappear. John Holdren, Obama's science advisor who oversaw the whole thing, is now a professor at Harvard. Lisa Jackson, who ran the EPA during this period, works for Apple as their Vice President of Environment. Jane Lubchenco, who ran NOAA, came back during the Biden administration and now advises climate-risk firms. Is this a conspiracy? No. About 70% of senior federal science officials move to private industry or academia after leaving government. This has been true for decades, across every administration. The Obama team's transition rate is statistically normal. But here's what matters: the infrastructure they built is permanent. The data keeps flowing. The commercial applications keep growing. And none of the equity mechanisms they talked about actually survived. ## Why This Matters Now There's a generation of children born between 2020 and 2027 who will grow up entirely inside this system. By the time they're adults, climate-risk scores will affect everything from where they can live to what they pay for food to whether they can get a mortgage. Those risk scores will be generated by private companies using public data. The kids won't have voted for this system. They won't have consented to it. It will simply be the water they swim in. And because the data infrastructure was built with unlimited commercial re-use rights, there's no mechanism to demand that private companies share the value they extract. No royalties. No reciprocity requirements. No binding obligations. The government could have structured this differently. They could have required companies that profit from NOAA data to contribute to climate adaptation funds. They could have mandated that risk models built on public data include public benefit provisions. They could have created a licensing system where commercial users pay fees that go back to vulnerable communities. They didn't. ## The Question That Remains Was this intentional? Did the Obama administration deliberately build a dual-use system—one that looked like climate justice but was actually designed to feed commercial risk pricing? Or was this opportunistic? Did well-meaning officials build open data infrastructure for good reasons, only to watch private companies exploit it in ways they never anticipated? The detailed document below examines this question carefully. It shows what we can prove (the infrastructure exists, the commercial exploitation is real, the equity programs were defunded) and what we can't prove (coordinated design, secret agreements, deliberate capture). But here's the hard truth: for the kids growing up inside this system, it doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. The outcome is the same either way. ## What You'll Find Below The document that follows is long and detailed. It provides sources for every claim. It shows the timeline, the budget numbers, the personnel connections, and the policy decisions. It's written for people who want to verify these claims independently. But the core story is simple: **Public money built a planetary-scale sensing system. That system was given away to commercial platforms with no restrictions. Private industry built a multi-trillion-dollar risk-pricing machine on top of it. Then the government defunded all the equity programs while keeping the satellites running.** The satellites still orbit. The data still flows. The toddlers are still young. The only question left is whether we'll build binding reciprocity mechanisms before this becomes permanent—before the ledger that measures planetary fate is exclusively controlled by those who profit from the measurements rather than those who bear the risks. Everything below is documentation. What you do with that documentation is up to you. --- # Climate & Meritocracy: How Public Weather Data Became Private Risk Scores ## The Ledger That Never Died *Between 2009 and 2017, the United States built the most sophisticated planetary sensing grid in human history—funded by taxpayers, framed in the language of climate justice, and deliberately placed on commercial cloud platforms with unlimited re-use rights. By 2025, the same public datasets power a two-trillion-dollar private climate-risk finance industry while the public multilateral mechanisms designed to deliver reparative flows have been systematically defunded. The satellites still orbit. The data still flows. But the equity wrapper has been stripped away, leaving only the raw pricing engine.* In December 2010, John P. Holdren stood before twenty thousand earth scientists at the American Geophysical Union's Fall Meeting in San Francisco and laid out a vision that would echo through federal agencies for years to come. As President Obama's Science Advisor and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, Holdren articulated what he called "a strategic plan for the next ten years that will embrace the science of responses with adaptation at the center of it, as well as the foundations of the physical climate system."[1] This was not abstract rhetoric. Holdren, a physicist with decades of work on energy and environmental systems, was describing the blueprint for what would become the most ambitious planetary-scale measurement infrastructure ever assembled—a network designed not merely to forecast weather but to quantify historical responsibility and potentially settle accumulated ecological debts across generations and borders. That speech came exactly one week after the White House Environmental Justice Forum brought together five Cabinet secretaries and more than one hundred community leaders to address how low-income and minority families bore disproportionate environmental burdens.[2] These were not isolated events. They formed the foundational architecture of a system that would weave together orbital sensing grids, re-analysis models, and screening mechanisms into what could have been the most enforceable multi-generational accountability framework ever conceived. Yet here is the part most observers miss: the ledger never died. It evolved. The Obama-era open-data mandates still feed today's AWS-hosted NOAA archives, which power everything from parametric insurance triggers to sovereign-risk pricing models.[3][4] The architects are not retired footnotes—John Holdren now serves as Research Professor at Harvard's Kennedy School and co-directs the Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program at the Belfer Center.[5][6] Lisa Jackson, the EPA Administrator who championed those early justice forums, reports directly to Tim Cook as Apple's Vice President of Environment, Policy, and Social Initiatives.[2] Arne Duncan, Holdren's co-author on a March 2010 op-ed linking science policy to equity, manages investments at Emerson Collective.[2] The 2025 restructuring—Paris Agreement withdrawal, Loss and Damage Fund abandonment, DOGE-era workforce reductions—was not a kill switch.[7][8] It was a pivot. The public multilateral model flatlined, but its private successors inherited the pulse, unbound by the transparency requirements that Holdren once mandated. *** ## The Seed Moment *In October 2009, President Obama signed an executive order that created the first federal framework linking climate adaptation to agency performance metrics. Over the following eighteen months, a series of task force reports, environmental justice forums, and interagency coordination efforts fused planetary sensing with human-capital considerations. This period planted the seed for what would later become a dual-use infrastructure capable of both scientific modeling and financial risk pricing.* The machinery began on October 5, 2009, when President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13514, titled "Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance."[2] This directive established an integrated strategy for sustainability in federal operations, emphasizing reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, and resource conservation. More significantly, it created the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, co-chaired by OSTP, the Council on Environmental Quality under Nancy Sutley, and NOAA under Jane Lubchenco.[2] The order required federal agencies to set targets for reducing scope one and two greenhouse gas emissions by fiscal year 2020 relative to a 2008 baseline. But buried within the directive's language was something more consequential: agencies were instructed to prioritize actions based on "a full accounting of economic and social benefits and costs," linking environmental goals to economic prosperity and community vitality.[2] This represented the first federal directive connecting climate adaptation to performance metrics—the original seed of later scoring mechanisms. By March 2010, the Task Force released its initial progress report, recommending the coordination of scientific inputs for adaptation decisions, enhanced communications and capacity-building, and the promotion of coordination across government levels.[2] The report emphasized integrating adaptation into existing agency planning and using decision-support tools like scenario analyses—language that encoded the sensing-scoring-settlement logic that would later define the system's dual-use potential. The pivotal moment came on December 15, 2010, when the White House Environmental Justice Forum convened five Cabinet secretaries—from EPA, HUD, Education, Transportation, and Labor—alongside more than one hundred community leaders.[2] The panels carried titles that revealed the administration's fusion thesis: "Climate Preparation in Vulnerable Communities" and "Clean Energy and Green Jobs." This was the moment the administration publicly merged climate adaptation with historical-equity rhetoric, creating the exact framing that would later justify placing the entire data stack into the public domain "for innovation." Holdren's OSTP was at the helm, reconvening the Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice for the first time in over a decade—a move EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson hailed as a "big step forward" in embedding equity into federal decision-making.[2] The Working Group had been established under Executive Order 12898 in 1994 but had lain dormant since the late Clinton era. Its resurrection signaled that climate adaptation would not proceed in isolation from questions of historical responsibility. *** ## The Architecture That Was Built *Between 2011 and 2016, the foundational policies took concrete form through technical and legal mechanisms that transformed rhetorical commitments into the world's most valuable open data asset. The NOAA Big Data Project migrated petabytes of climate data to commercial cloud platforms with explicit commercial re-use rights. The OSTP's 2013 open data memorandum legally obligated agencies to make research publicly accessible. And the EPA's EJSCREEN tool became the first federal mechanism to combine environmental burden data with historical demographic indicators.* The single most consequential decision in this entire timeline occurred in April 2015, when NOAA signed Cooperative Research and Development Agreements with Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft, IBM, and the Open Commons Consortium.[3][9][4] The NOAA Big Data Project moved more than two hundred years of weather observations, satellite imagery, radar data, and climate models to commercial cloud platforms—hundreds of petabytes representing the accumulated scientific output of the nation's atmospheric sensing enterprise.[9] The agreements explicitly granted commercial re-use rights with no royalties and no restrictions.[2][4] As AWS announced when NOAA's NEXRAD weather radar data became available on Amazon Simple Storage Service in October 2015, users could access the data without having to transfer or store it themselves, and they gained access to the full suite of AWS processing tools for developing "high-performance data visualization and analyses products."[9] The Climate Corporation reduced project timelines by several months once NEXRAD data became cloud-accessible. NOAA estimated that making NEXRAD data available on Amazon S3 led to a 2.3-times increase in usage.[4] The legal architecture that guaranteed this commercialization came from the OSTP's February 22, 2013, memorandum on "Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research."[2] Issued by Holdren himself, the memorandum applied to every agency with more than one hundred million dollars in research and development budgets—NASA, NOAA, NSF, NIH, and others. It required machine-readable public access to both publications and underlying data.[2] This was the document that legally obligated NOAA to place everything on AWS with commercial licenses. Concurrent with the data migration, the U.S. Global Change Research Program continued coordinating climate research across thirteen federal agencies, including NASA, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Agriculture, and Health and Human Services.[2] The USGCRP's quadrennial National Climate Assessments synthesized data from thousands of sources to model regional climate impacts, incorporating socioeconomic factors such as population vulnerability and economic resilience.[2] The Third National Climate Assessment, released in 2014, represented the most comprehensive synthesis of regional vulnerabilities ever produced by the federal government. Meanwhile, the EPA launched EJSCREEN in October 2015—the first federal environmental justice geospatial screening tool.[2] This interactive mapping platform combined thirteen pollution indicators with nine demographic indicators, including percent minority population, percent low-income households, and linguistic isolation. The tool explicitly cited redlining and historical discrimination in its methodology.[2] EJSCREEN represented the closest any federal agency ever came to operationalizing "historical burden" scoring on a national scale. By 2016, these elements had coalesced into a system capable of processing vast amounts of interconnected data—from environmental metrics to social and economic indicators. Data.gov hosted over two hundred thousand datasets.[2] The Broadband Technology Opportunities Program had deployed more than one hundred thousand miles of network infrastructure, connecting underserved communities and enabling the data flows essential for climate modeling.[2] The minority-business set-aside programs administered by the Small Business Administration had certified thousands of firms owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, integrating with green procurement requirements.[2] *** ## The Commercial Resurrection *As of November 2025, every byte of NOAA's historical and real-time climate data remains available for unlimited commercial re-use—for free. No login, no fee, no usage reporting required. The private market built on this public infrastructure now exceeds two trillion dollars, dwarfing the entire federal climate science budget by a factor of fifty. Companies explicitly cite NOAA data sources in their product sheets for parametric insurance triggers, sovereign-risk pricing models, and catastrophe bond underwriting.* The AWS Open Data Registry hosts dozens of NOAA datasets under the "Big Data Project" umbrella: GOES-16, 17, and 18 full-disk satellite imagery at ten-minute cadence; NEXRAD Level-II radar from all 159 continental U.S. sites; Global Forecast System ensemble runs at quarter-degree resolution; Climate Forecast System Reanalysis extending back to 1979.[10] All of this data carries NOAA's "no restrictions" policy. Any hedge fund, reinsurer, or sovereign-risk desk can—and does—ingest petabytes nightly. The first billion-dollar products emerged by 2023. Descartes Underwriting launched parametric tornado insurance products that use GOES-R Band 13 clean infrared longwave data as triggers, with premium writings reaching billions of dollars.[2] Jupiter Intelligence's ClimateScore Global platform integrates GFS, CFSR, and NEXRAD mosaic data for enterprise climate risk assessment.[2] Cervest's EarthScan product uses the full NOAA Open Data stack.[2] Arbol's Climate Risk Marketplace deploys NOAA ENSO indices and GFS data for parametric coverage.[2] Kettle Re uses NEXRAD and GOES-R data for wildfire convection analysis in catastrophe bond issuance.[2] The scale of private climate-risk finance built on public data has grown exponentially. Catastrophe bonds grew from forty-two billion dollars in 2023 to fifty-three billion in 2025.[2] Parametric micro-insurance expanded from eleven billion to nineteen billion over the same period.[2] Sovereign climate-risk pricing influencing emerging market bond spreads now affects more than 1.3 trillion dollars in debt.[2] Conservative estimates place total private climate-risk finance between 1.9 and 2.2 trillion dollars.[2] For context, the entire U.S. federal climate science budget from 2009 to 2025 totaled approximately thirty-nine billion dollars.[2] The private market built on that public investment is now fifty times larger. Private risk maps routinely show fifteen to forty percent higher severity than public NOAA products.[2] This divergence is not evidence of secret data streams or manipulation—it reflects deliberate tail-risk pricing. NOAA's public Climate Prediction Center uses moderate warming scenarios, while private models employ high-end scenarios because insurance must price the one-in-two-hundred-year event.[2] When the Risk Management Solutions Global Climate Risk Index shows thirty-eight percent higher financial loss estimates than NOAA's National Risk Index for identical geographic areas, this reflects standard actuarial practice, not coordination or preferential access.[2] *** ## The Moral Wrapper Is Removed *In 2025, the United States deliberately terminated every multilateral climate commitment made between 2009 and 2021. The Paris Agreement withdrawal took effect. The Loss and Damage Fund pledge was rescinded. The Green Climate Fund commitment was abandoned. Yet the sensing satellites received budget increases. The measurement spine was preserved—and in some cases expanded—while the equity and coordination layers were systematically eliminated.* On January 20, 2025, hours after his second inauguration, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14162, titled "Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements," formally initiating U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.[8][11][12] The withdrawal became effective exactly one year later in January 2026—far faster than during the first Trump administration, when treaty restrictions delayed the exit until near the end of his term.[7][8] The executive order also directed withdrawal from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the 1992 treaty underpinning all global climate negotiations.[7] On March 4, 2025, a Treasury Department letter to Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage co-chair Jean-Christophe Donnellier stated that both the U.S. Board Member and Alternate Board Member would step down "effective immediately."[13][14][15] The United States had pledged just 17.5 million dollars to the fund—a fraction of the 741 million dollars committed by twenty-seven other countries and regions.[14] The fund itself estimates that developing countries' loss and damage needs in 2025 alone total 395 billion dollars.[14] The administration rescinded four billion dollars in outstanding pledges to the UN's Green Climate Fund.[13] It appointed numerous chemical and oil industry alumni to the Environmental Protection Agency.[13] It rescinded the Biden-era Justice40 Initiative, which had required agencies to direct forty percent of federal climate program benefits to disadvantaged communities.[13] It withdrew from the forty-five-billion-dollar Just Energy Transition Partnership designed to help developing countries transition away from coal.[13] Domestically, the Department of Government Efficiency—led initially by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy before formally disbanding in May 2025—embedded efficiency principles across federal agencies.[16][17][18] By November 2025, 317,000 federal employees had left government service, surpassing administration targets.[16][17] The Office of Personnel Management reported that the federal civilian workforce had shrunk to approximately 2.1 million.[16] The OSTP was reduced to approximately thirty-five staff from around ninety under prior administrations.[2] Congress slashed the White House science office budget.[2] The FY2026 Presidential Budget Request proposed cutting the NOAA Climate Program Office from 190 million dollars to 41 million—a seventy-eight percent reduction.[2] The USGCRP coordinating office was proposed for complete elimination.[2] EPA Environmental Justice grants faced ninety percent cuts.[2] Yet the measurement satellites received increases. GOES-R series funding rose nine percent to 1.2 billion dollars.[2] JPSS polar satellite funding increased seven percent to 1.5 billion dollars.[2] On May 23, 2025, Executive Order 14303—"Restoring Gold Standard Science"—established nine core tenets for federal scientific research, emphasizing transparency, rigor, and reproducibility while effectively halting new federal climate-adaptation planning.[2] The pattern is unmistakable: the public multilateral model was deliberately terminated while the planetary sensing grid was preserved and expanded. No document explicitly states "we are keeping the data spine but killing the justice layer." But the budget tables constitute the functional equivalent. *** ## The Private Sector Fills the Vacuum *With the public equity layer gone, private platforms became the de facto planetary ledger. Palantir Technologies integrated petabyte-scale environmental datasets into its Gotham and Foundry platforms. In May 2025, xAI partnered with Palantir and TWG Global to deploy artificial intelligence across banking, insurance, and capital markets—explicitly targeting real-time world simulation using satellite and financial data. SpaceX's Starlink provides the only high-bandwidth connectivity to sixty percent of global offshore wind farms, while the classified Starshield system possesses capabilities that exceed public satellites.* Palantir Technologies' 2024 SEC 10-K filing references "integration of petabyte-scale environmental datasets from government partners" on page 83.[2] The company's Gotham platform launched a "Climate & Geopolitical Risk" module in 2022, with a major update in late 2024.[2] Government business growth reached fifty-two percent year-over-year in the second quarter of 2025.[2] In December 2024, Palantir expanded its partnership with Shield AI to integrate autonomy software with its Warp Speed operating system for defense applications.[2] On May 6, 2025, xAI, Palantir, and TWG Global announced a partnership aimed at transforming how financial service providers adopt and scale artificial intelligence.[19][20][21][22][23] The collaboration builds on a March 2025 joint venture between Palantir and TWG Global focused on AI deployment in financial services and insurance.[19][24] With xAI bringing its Grok family of large language models and Colossus supercomputer, the partnership explicitly targets banking, lending, insurance, and investment markets.[20] Alex Karp, Palantir's co-founder and CEO, stated that the partnership would help institutions stop "spending excessive time managing fragmented systems instead of harnessing the transformative capabilities of AI to unlock significant growth."[22] The collaboration plans to develop and implement "a workforce of hundreds of thousands of AI agents" to transform business operations, including underwriting, KYC/AML compliance, portfolio risk assessment, and claims processing.[21][22] The offering includes a "Governance Foundation" for data readiness and security infrastructure, an "Agent Suite" of industry-tuned AI tools, and an "Agentic Workforce" of customizable AI agents designed for specific business processes.[20][21] Unlike vendors dependent on per-seat licensing, this partnership operates on an "outcome-based business model" linking success to measurable results.[22] SpaceX's Starlink constellation provides satellite internet connectivity that has become essential infrastructure for remote scientific operations. Researchers at Cornell University credited NEXRAD data availability on AWS with enabling the "first-ever national bird count using weather radar," tracking migration patterns of four billion birds.[4] NASA researchers presented methods using GOES data on AWS to "produce an active fire map every five minutes over the conterminous US."[4] Starshield, the military-focused variant of Starlink, possesses synthetic aperture radar and optical capabilities that exceed public satellite systems—though no public contract links Starshield to NOAA data processing for climate finance applications.[2] The physical infrastructure for private planetary sensing now exists independent of government coordination. NOAA's Project EAGLE, launched in 2025, integrates real-time satellite observations into AI weather models, enabling rapid testing and demonstration of AI forecasts.[2] The sensing spine that taxpayers built has been upgraded, privatized, and positioned for applications its original architects never publicly described. *** ## The Personnel Continuity *The architects of the Obama-era climate infrastructure did not retire to obscurity. John Holdren remains at Harvard's Belfer Center. Lisa Jackson leads Apple's environmental initiatives. Jane Lubchenco advises climate-risk firms after serving again in the Biden administration. Kathryn Sullivan sits on the board of Terra Alpha Investments. Yet this pattern represents normal career progression, not coordination. Approximately seventy percent of senior federal science officials transition to private-sector or academic roles—the Obama cohort is statistically indistinguishable from every administration since 1980.* John P. Holdren, who served as OSTP Director from 2009 to 2017—becoming the longest-serving Science Advisor to the President in the history of the position—now holds the title of Research Professor at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and co-directs the Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.[25][5][26][6] He is also President Emeritus and Senior Advisor to the President at the Woodwell Climate Research Center.[5] Lisa P. Jackson, EPA Administrator from 2009 to 2013, has served as Apple's Vice President of Environment, Policy, and Social Initiatives since her departure from government.[2] In this role, she oversees a technology giant's sustainability initiatives that fuse climate data with supply-chain analysis. Jane Lubchenco, who served as NOAA Administrator from 2009 to 2013, returned to government as Deputy Director for Climate and Environment in the Biden White House from 2021 to 2023.[2] She maintains connections to Oregon State University and advises climate-risk analysis firms including the Rhodium Group.[2] Kathryn Sullivan, NOAA Administrator from 2014 to 2017, serves on the board of Terra Alpha Investments, an ESG data provider that integrates NOAA-derived climate risk scores into sovereign bond pricing.[2] Nancy Sutley, CEQ Chair from 2009 to 2013, became Chief Sustainability Officer at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.[2] Gina McCarthy, EPA Administrator from 2013 to 2017, served as a senior advisor to BlackRock before departing in 2024.[2] Ernest Moniz, Energy Secretary from 2013 to 2017, now leads the Energy Futures Initiative.[2] These positions generate substantial compensation—Jackson's role at Apple likely involves stock compensation in the tens of millions of dollars; Holdren's professorship at Harvard pays approximately 280,000 dollars; board seats and advisory roles for former NOAA administrators typically command 350,000 to 400,000 dollars annually.[2] Yet this pattern requires context. Congressional Research Service reports show that sixty-five to seventy percent of senior federal science officials move to industry or academia within five years of leaving government.[2] The Obama cohort's seventy-one percent transition rate is statistically indistinguishable from the Bush administration's sixty-eight percent, the first Trump administration's sixty-five percent, or the Biden administration's sixty-nine percent.[2] What appeared in earlier analysis as a coordinated network was simply the standard career path for senior federal science officials in the twenty-first century. No evidence demonstrates joint strategy sessions, shared capital tables, or coordinated lobbying among these individuals. The Emerson Collective invested 123 million dollars in climate-tech startups between 2017 and 2025—not the 340 million sometimes claimed.[2] Apple's environmental progress reports cite generic "satellite data" without specifically naming NOAA datasets.[2] Lisa Jackson advises climate-focused foundations but does not sit on risk-pricing firm boards.[2] The infrastructure continuity is real. The commercial applications are real. The personnel connections are real. What remains unproven is whether this constitutes coordinated dual-use design rather than opportunistic exploitation of public infrastructure by commercial actors following predictable career paths. *** ## The ESG Collapse *The moral wrapper that was supposed to force reciprocity between public infrastructure and private benefit simply disintegrated under its own contradictions. Greenwashing fines exceeded one hundred million dollars between 2021 and 2025. Academic research showed that ESG rating correlations averaged just 0.54 across major agencies—measurement divergence explained fifty-six percent of rating disagreement. Major institutional investors withdrew from climate-focused initiatives, with BlackRock supporting only four percent of environmental and social shareholder proposals in 2024, down from twenty-one percent in 2022.* The equity wrapper was never rigorous enough to function as an enforcement mechanism. DWS, Deutsche Bank's asset management arm, received a nineteen-million-dollar fine from the SEC in 2023 and a twenty-five-million-euro fine from Frankfurt prosecutors in 2025 for overstating the sustainability credentials of its investment products.[2] Goldman Sachs Asset Management paid four million dollars in ESG-related penalties in 2023.[2] BNY Mellon settled for 1.5 million dollars in 2022.[2] Desiree Fixler, who served as DWS Group Sustainability Officer before exposing the greenwashing in August 2021, became a public critic of the system she helped build.[2] She was invited to a World Economic Forum council after the scandal broke but resigned in November 2025, posting on LinkedIn: "I can no longer lend credibility to an institution that hurts the world while claiming to save it."[2] Academic research confirmed what practitioners suspected. Berg, Kölbel, and Rigobon's 2022 analysis in the Review of Financial Studies found that correlations between major ESG rating agencies averaged just 0.54—measurement divergence explained fifty-six percent of rating disagreement.[2] Companies could receive dramatically different scores from different providers based on weighting choices and indicator selection, not underlying environmental performance. Institutional retreat accelerated through 2024 and 2025. BlackRock's 2024 proxy voting supported only four percent of environmental and social shareholder proposals, down from twenty-one percent in 2022.[2] State Street Global Advisors exited the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative in January 2025.[2] Vanguard withdrew from the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero in December 2024.[2] JPMorgan, State Street, and PIMCO all departed Climate Action 100+ during 2024 under political pressure from state attorneys general.[2] The public-private equity layer that was supposed to ensure that commercial use of public climate data generated reciprocal benefits for vulnerable populations is effectively dead. The sensing infrastructure remains. The commercial products proliferate. The moral accountability mechanism collapsed. *** ## The Fork *Three futures are now being built simultaneously. Path A—the Just Machine—would anchor planetary ledgers with co-owned data, transparent oracles, and real exit rights. Path B—hybrid inertia—represents the current trajectory of nominal individual data ownership undermined by platform extraction. Path C—the Final Extraction Engine—would create permanent information asymmetry with no exit for ninety-five percent of the population. The technical, financial, and governance components for all three paths already exist in production somewhere on Earth. The only variable remaining is deliberate choice.* Every major component of the equitable path already exists in operational form. Co-owned longitudinal data has been prototyped by companies like LunaDNA, which has tokenized equity for forty thousand genomic contributors.[2] Transparent climate oracles using Chainlink and NOAA GOES-R feeds have been publicly available since 2023.[2] Partial implementations of Nash-grade stable currencies exist in projects like Numéraire and historical Havven designs.[2] Real exit rights with territorial arbitration are already operational in Honduras's Próspera ZEDE, which offers a 7.5 percent tax cap and ICSID arbitration for disputes.[2] The hybrid inertia path—the current default—sees individuals nominally owning their data while platforms extract value through four-hundred-page terms of service agreements. BlackRock Aladdin, Palantir Gotham, and xAI Grok operate as proprietary oracles with minimal transparency requirements. Flows remain predominantly loan-based, with ninety percent of current Loss and Damage mechanisms structured as debt rather than grants.[2] Elite-only exit options characterize the charter-city reality, while soft coercion through credit scores, platform terms, and social pressure shapes behavior. The extraction engine path—already printing through charter cities and longevity clinics—would feature data permanently extracted with no deletion rights, classified oracle systems with zero transparency, fiat inflation combined with central bank digital currency control, and sovereign-risk-priced debt traps. Exit options would exist only for the privileged few, with hard coercion through private security, binding arbitration, and potentially drone enforcement for the rest. Children born between 2020 and 2027 represent the first full cohort who will grow up inside the fully converged private ledger. Their epigenetic profiles, early-childhood climate exposures, and behavioral scores are already being captured through prenatal testing, cord-blood banking, consumer genomics, hospital electronic health records, and emerging brain-computer interface pilots. By the time they reach adulthood in 2040 to 2048, the private merit systems will have two decades of longitudinal data on them. Those systems will determine access to extended healthy lifespans through senescence-reversal therapies, high-affordance network-state citizenship, enhanced cognition stacks, and reproductive technologies orders of magnitude more selective than today's assisted reproduction. For those reading this, the outcomes remain somewhat negotiable through politics, covenants, or exit. For those children, the outcomes will be biologically and legally determined before they ever have agency. The window for intervention measures in years, not decades. *** ## The Defensible Core *Public climate data infrastructure built with taxpayer funding and framed with equity rhetoric has been commercialized at planetary scale without any binding mechanism to ensure reciprocal benefit for climate-vulnerable populations who bear the physical and financial costs of climate change. This is not a conspiracy. It is the predictable outcome of open-data idealism meeting unregulated financialization in the absence of a covenant. The result is the largest quiet transfer of public scientific value to private capital in human history.* This claim survives every interrogation. NOAA data is on AWS with commercial re-use licenses—proven through the registry itself.[10] Private climate finance built on that data exceeds two trillion dollars—verified through industry sources and independent analyses.[2] The public equity layer was systematically defunded in 2025—documented through executive orders, Treasury letters, and budget requests.[7][13][15] Sensing satellites remain fully funded—confirmed through appropriations documents.[2] Career progression of federal science officials follows normal historical patterns—established through Congressional Research Service data.[2] What cannot be proven with current evidence: intentional dual-use design in 2009-2017, an operational "Historical Ecological Debt Index" as a named federal program, coordinated alumni networks pursuing a shared strategic agenda, or secret environmental intelligence contracts linking Starshield to climate finance. The infrastructure continuity is real. The commercial exploitation is real. The personnel connections are real. Whether this represents coordinated capture or opportunistic exploitation of public goods by commercial actors remains an open question requiring further investigation through Freedom of Information Act requests for OSTP communications, NOAA contract details, and interagency coordination documents. The satellites still orbit. The data still flows. The toddlers are still young. The only remaining variable is whether binding reciprocity mechanisms will be established before the speciation fork becomes irreversible—whether the ledger that measures planetary fate will serve transformation or extraction. The mirror is not dark. It is simply high-resolution. And it is pointed at all of us. Sources [1] Dark-Mirror.md https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/21552502/e6523cce-c078-43aa-bc93-e4b8b641e6de/Dark-Mirror.md [2] CLIMATE-NEW-MASTER-OUTLINE.md https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/21552502/393dd96a-e366-41f0-b459-9a89267c76e4/CLIMATE-NEW-MASTER-OUTLINE.md [3] NOAA Open Data Dissemination: Petabyte-scale Earth system data in the cloud https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10511182/ [4] NOAA and AWS expand commitment to increase access to ... https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/publicsector/noaa-and-aws-expand-commitment-to-increase-access-to-environmental-data/ [5] John Holdren | Harvard Kennedy School https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty/john-holdren [6] John P. Holdren | The Belfer Center for Science and International ... https://www.belfercenter.org/person/john-p-holdren [7] Trump can leave the Paris Agreement behind, but not America's ... https://us.boell.org/en/2025/11/04/trump-can-leave-paris-agreement-behind-not-americas-climate-finance-obligations [8] United States and the Paris Agreement - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_Paris_Agreement [9] NOAA Big Data Project - North Carolina Institute for Climate Studies https://ncics.org/portfolio/data-stewardship/noaa-big-data-2/ [10] Registry of Open Data on AWS, NOAA https://registry.opendata.aws/collab/noaa/ [11] Trump orders U.S. withdrawal from Paris Agreement, revokes Biden ... https://www.npr.org/2025/01/21/nx-s1-5266207/trump-paris-agreement-biden-climate-change [12] Putting America First In International Environmental Agreements https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/putting-america-first-in-international-environmental-agreements/ [13] US Exits Board of Hard-Fought Loss and Damage Fund - Earth.Org https://earth.org/us-exits-board-of-hard-fought-loss-and-damage-fund-further-distancing-itself-from-global-climate-commitments/ [14] What does the U.S. withdrawal from the Board of the Fund for ... https://www.lossanddamagecollaboration.org/resources/what-does-the-u-s-withdrawal-from-the-board-of-the-fund-for-responding-to-loss-and-damage-mean-for-loss-and-damage [15] U.S. Withdraws from Climate Damage Fund | ASIL https://www.asil.org/ILIB/us-withdraws-climate-damage-fund [16] DOGE has quietly ceased to exist well ahead of schedule, report says https://fortune.com/2025/11/23/doge-elon-musk-federal-bureaucracy-budget-cuts-opm-headcount-staffing/ [17] DOGE quietly disbands 8 months ahead of schedule https://wtop.com/government/2025/11/doge-quietly-disbands-8-months-ahead-of-schedule/ [18] Exclusive: DOGE 'doesn't exist' with eight months left on its charter https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-doesnt-exist-with-eight-months-left-its-charter-2025-11-23/ [19] Can xAI+Palantir+TWG Tame Big Banking? - Brimma Tech https://www.brimmatech.com/can-xaipalantirtwg-tame-big-banking/ [20] Palantir, xAI and TWG Global form partnership to drive AI adoption in ... https://www.fstech.co.uk/fst/Palantir_xAI_And_TWG_Global_Form_Partnership_To_Drive_AI_Adoption_In_Financial_Services.php [21] Palantir xAI Partnership Sets New Standard for Enterprise AI in ... https://www.aikatana.com/p/palantir-xai-partnership-enterprise-ai-finance [22] xAI, TWG Global and Palantir Unite to Redefine Financial Services ... https://finance.yahoo.com/news/xai-twg-global-palantir-unite-110000386.html [23] Musk's xAI joins TWG Global, Palantir for AI push in financial sector https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-xai-joins-twg-global-palantir-ai-push-financial-sector-2025-05-06/ [24] How xAI, Palantir and TWG Global Are Shaping the Future of AI in ... https://applyingai.com/2025/05/how-xai-palantir-and-twg-global-are-shaping-the-future-of-ai-in-financial-services/ [25] John P. Holdren - American Academy of Political and Social Science https://www.aapss.org/fellows/fellow/john-holdren/ [26] John Holdren - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Holdren [27] Dark-Mirror-Interrogations.md https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/21552502/6c23d481-cee5-48af-b0a0-0812b8aeb770/Dark-Mirror-Interrogations.md [28] Outline-Gen-2.md https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/21552502/e2241648-8ea8-4683-937f-8e092fe31910/Outline-Gen-2.md [29] Big data for scientific research and discovery http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17538947.2015.1015942 [30] Conceptual Model for Successful Implementation of Big Data in Organizations https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/jitim/vol24/iss2/2 [31] Individual Voices in Big Data Legends: The 2015 Gorkha-Nepal Earthquake https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99c174537dacac4f0f9aa6a871d0f290cc4a5944 [32] GPCP Version 2.2 Combined Precipitation Data Set https://gdex.ucar.edu/datasets/d728002/ [33] Outreaching a space technique through its climate applications: altimetry and COP21 meeting example https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66f46088c6b775b59b20d2cb550ed121c9b3bacb [34] Studying the Effect of Sea-Level Rise on Infrastructure and Construction https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ourj/vol3/iss1/3/ [35] Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater flow in fractured-rock aquifers of the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Physiographic Provinces, Bedford County, Virginia https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/sir20155113 [36] “Geospatial Perspectives on Drought in India and Agriculture” https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f1e30af277a32d7e68d613645a6b4a5e81cca03 [37] A Study of the Effects of Usability on Risk Perception and User Affinity of Risk Finder https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71104827e99d32c2cc7357f36da87ab03c7247bc [38] The 10 th International Scientific Conference “ DEFENSE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE 21 st CENTURY ” Braşov , November 13 th 2015 CURRENT CHALLENGES IN DESIGN , DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS Ltc . https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffb7f3380bb59548fd9d751a032cb13e5351f79f [39] An Interoperable Open Data Portal for Climate Analysis https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.09797.pdf [40] A long-term Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent data record for climate studies and monitoring https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/7/137/2015/essd-7-137-2015.pdf [41] The SASSCAL contribution to climate observation, climate data management and data rescue in Southern Africa https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/12/171/2015/asr-12-171-2015.pdf [42] The AntAWS dataset: a compilation of Antarctic automatic weather station observations https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/411/2023/essd-15-411-2023.pdf [43] GPC/m: Global Precipitation Climatology by Machine Learning; Quasi-global, Daily, and One Degree Spatial Resolution https://arxiv.org/html/2409.09639v1 [44] High-Resolution Estimation of Monthly Air Temperature from Joint Modeling of In Situ Measurements and Gridded Temperature Data https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/10/3/47/pdf?version=1647826104 [45] National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/963/2023/essd-15-963-2023.pdf [46] [PDF] US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement and from the WHO https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2025/767230/EPRS_ATA(2025)767230_EN.pdf [47] Obama Science Advisor John Holdren on Actions ... - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avUMfpRmNJE [48] [PDF] NOAA's Big Data Project: Vision and Approach - ECMWF https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2017/17128-noaa-big-data-project-vision-and-approach.pdf [49] U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: Process and Potential ... https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48504 [50] John P. Holdren – NAS - National Academy of Sciences https://www.nasonline.org/directory-entry/john-p-holdren-9beut2/ [51] NOAA Open Data Dissemination (Formerly NOAA Big Data Project ... https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119467557.ch4 [52] NOAA Expands Public Access to Big Data | News https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/noaa-expands-big-data-access [53] NOAA partners with 3 big cloud providers to disperse environmental ... https://fedscoop.com/noaa-cloud-providers-environmental-data/ [54] Five things to know about the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris ... https://www.woodwellclimate.org/us-withdrawal-paris-agreement/ [55] Loss of the clock protein PERIOD1 in salt-sensitive hypertension activates tissue-specific Angiotensinogen signaling in male rats https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/physiol.2025.40.S1.0707 [56] Abstract 265: NF1 is a novel MAP that modulates microtubule damage repair: rediscovering a tumor suppressor https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/85/8_Supplement_1/265/756634/Abstract-265-NF1-is-a-novel-MAP-that-modulates [57] A01 From application to conversion: the development of a tourniquet reassessment algorithm for nonmedical military personnel by a NATO specialist team https://militaryhealth.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2025-NATO.1 [58] Multi-Risk Dynamic Assessment for Resilience Building Towards Natural and Manmade Hazards of Submarine Infrastructures https://onepetro.org/SPEADIP/proceedings/25ADIP/25ADIP/D041S141R005/793522 [59] Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD014617.pub3 [60] Economic quantification of Loss and Damage funding needs https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-024-00565-7 [61] Loss and Damage, Climate Victims, and International Climate Law: Looking Back, Looking Forward https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/CB089646C303F95A4C630405E2F81E09/S2047102523000237a.pdf/div-class-title-loss-and-damage-climate-victims-and-international-climate-law-looking-back-looking-forward-div.pdf [62] Measuring population health impact of the Trump administration’s withdrawal from WHO and cuts to USAID: time to start counting https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11978123/ [63] Navigating independence: the short-term and long-term impacts of USAID dismantling on Somalia’s humanitarian and development landscape https://gh.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019330 [64] A Minimal Capabilities-Based Account of Loss and Damage https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19452829.2024.2305388?needAccess=true [65] State of Climate Law∵The Third Pillar of International Climate Change Law: Explaining ‘Loss and Damage’ after the Paris Agreement https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/clla/10/2/article-p211_211.pdf [66] Disapproval of Climate Policy Dismantlement: A Comparative Analysis of International Public Opinion on Donald Trump’s Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Change Regime https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13876988.2023.2262431?needAccess=true [67] Turning climate justice into practice? Channeling loss and damage funding through national social protection systems in climate‐vulnerable countries https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/wcc.867 [68] An ‘Americas First’ foreign policy includes global health https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11992382/ [69] Project 2025 wanted to hobble the federal workforce. DOGE has ... https://www.govexec.com/transition/2025/04/project-2025-wanted-hobble-federal-workforce-doge-has-hastily-done-and-more/404390/ [70] How many people can the federal government lose before it crashes? https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-many-people-can-the-federal-government-lose-before-it-crashes/ [71] Inside the DOGE Succession Drama Elon Musk Left Behind https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/11/21/doge-elon-musk-succession-00641110 [72] The US pullout from the climate loss and damage fund will prove ... https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/us-pullout-from-the-climate-loss-and-damage-fund-will-prove-costlier/ [73] 2025 United States federal mass layoffs - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_mass_layoffs [74] United States quits board of UN climate damage fund, letter shows https://www.reuters.com/world/us/united-states-quits-board-un-climate-damage-fund-letter-shows-2025-03-07/ [75] Latest FedScope data • 2025 federal workforce changes https://ourpublicservice.org/blog/new-fedscope-data-2025-opm-federal-workforce-changes-doge-trump-administration/