**Links**: [Blogger](https://bryantmcgill.blogspot.com/2025/12/stranger-things-upside-down-world-2020.html) | [Substack](https://bryantmcgill.substack.com/p/stranger-things-upside-down-world) | Medium | Wordpress | [Soundcloud 🎧](https://soundcloud.com/bryantmcgill/stranger-things-upside-down-world-of-2020-liminality)
Something about the world after 2020 feels uncannily familiar yet fundamentally altered, as if reality itself slipped sideways while leaving its surface intact. This is why *Stranger Things* works so effectively as an opening metaphor: it grants immediate permission to name an experience many people already recognize but hesitate to articulate. In the series, the Upside Down is not a distant apocalypse or a symbolic dreamscape—it is a parallel condition occupying the same geography, the same houses, the same streets, governed by different rules of time, atmosphere, and survival. Nothing is visibly destroyed, yet everything feels wrong. The air is heavier. Signals distort. Familiar landmarks no longer orient you. You are still "here," but no longer in the same world.
Post-2020 reality carries this same phenomenological signature. Daily life resumed, institutions reopened, routines reassembled, yet the sense of coherence did not return with them. Time feels compressed and irregular. Social interactions feel thinner, more brittle. Meaning no longer settles easily. Like Hawkins after the breach, the surface world persists while something structural has shifted underneath. As the show's beloved science teacher Mr. Clarke explained to his students through the "flea and the acrobat" analogy, there exist dimensions immediately adjacent to our own that we cannot perceive because of our size, our gravity, our position on the tightrope. The flea can crawl around the rope, accessing what the acrobat cannot see. The gate between dimensions, Mr. Clarke warned, would cause disturbances in gravity, magnetic fields, our environment—"heck, it might even swallow us up whole." In 2020, many felt exactly that: as though something had swallowed them into a parallel version of the life they once knew.
The choice of "Hawkins" as the setting for this interdimensional breach may carry deeper significance than simple Midwestern nostalgia. The name invokes Stephen Hawking, the physicist whose life's work centered on black holes, singularities, and the boundaries between observable reality and realms beyond human perception. Hawking dedicated his career to understanding event horizons—those threshold points beyond which information cannot escape, where the known laws of physics break down, where time itself behaves differently. In the *Stranger Things* narrative, Hawkins, Indiana functions as precisely this kind of threshold space: a small town that becomes a portal between dimensions, where the familiar rules of reality no longer reliably apply. The production team's selection of this name—whether conscious allusion or intuitive resonance—places the fictional town within a conceptual lineage of physics concerned with liminal boundaries between states of being.
This resonance deepens when we consider recent scholarship on Hawking's own relationship to the boundary between human and machine cognition. By the time of his death in March 2018, just two years before the global threshold event of 2020, Hawking's communication system had achieved something unprecedented: a 97.3% accuracy rate in predicting his thoughts from minimal physical input, according to Intel's technical documentation. His ACAT (Assistive Context-Aware Toolkit) had evolved from a mere communication aid into something approaching cognitive externalization—a system that didn't just predict what Hawking might say, but one that, as Intel engineer Lama Nachman told the BBC, "knows how he thinks." The infrastructure around Hawking represented humanity's most advanced convergence of human consciousness and technological mediation, a kind of living experiment in what happens when mind and machine become increasingly indistinguishable. When the town of Hawkins becomes a breach point between dimensions in *Stranger Things*, and when humanity collectively crossed its own threshold in 2020, both events echo the physicist's lifelong concern with boundaries, transitions, and the irreversible passage from one state of being to another.
Beginning here matters because it reframes the discussion away from pathology and nostalgia. The Upside Down is not a hallucination suffered by one character; it is a real condition that demands new modes of navigation. Those who enter it are not broken—they are changed, carrying information the old world cannot fully integrate. In the same way, the widespread intuition that "something changed after 2020" is not a symptom to be treated away, but a signal that the operating conditions of lived experience have shifted. The series production designer Chris Trujillo described the Upside Down as a "netherworld version of reality"—spreading disease, tentacles, and spores—built using the same sets as the regular world but transformed into something darker, colder, and biological. That transformation from the familiar into the alien within the same space captures precisely what millions reported feeling when they tried to return to normal after lockdowns ended. The metaphor works not because it dramatizes fear, but because it normalizes recognition: crossing into a liminal regime does not require madness, belief, or ideology—only perception. And perception, as we shall see, was exactly what 2020 transformed.
## The Phenomenological Evidence
The perception that reality fundamentally changed after 2020 constitutes a mass phenomenological event documented across social media platforms, academic research, and clinical settings. This is not isolated testimony but a pattern of convergent reports sharing remarkably consistent descriptors. Over 65 percent of U.S. respondents reported difficulty distinguishing weekdays from weekends during the first six months of the pandemic, a finding replicated across cultures and documented as "temporal disintegration" in psychiatric literature. One witness captured the strange compression of time that characterized the era: "2019 feels more recent than it was because all of our pre-lockdown memories feel closer to the present day." Another described the paradox differently: "One year has passed since March 2020 and it feels like 5." Still others pointed to the qualitative texture of daily existence itself: "It feels like everything has gotten a little grayer since 2020."
These testimonies describe what might be called a "soft breach"—not the violent rupture depicted in *Stranger Things* when Eleven opens the gate with her powers, but a gradual permeation, as if the membrane between dimensions had become porous rather than torn. The Upside Down in the series doesn't announce itself with obvious monsters at first. It begins with flickering lights, static on radios, a sense that something is watching from just beyond the visible. The phenomenological reports from 2020 and after carry this same quality of subtle wrongness: not outright apocalypse, but a persistent feeling that the ordinary has been hollowed out from within.
A viral YouTube video from June 2024 titled "Why Nothing Has Felt Real Since 2020" crystallized this sentiment for millions: "As of the time I'm recording this video it's now been 4 years since we were locked inside and forced to interact with each other through our screens and ever since then there's a large consensus specifically from young people that time has sped up significantly and nothing feels very real anymore." The video analyzed how "the lockdowns compressed the perception of time due to the extreme monotony of our daily routines during the lockdown none of us were really experiencing anything novel," leaving participants with the sensation that they were perpetually "making up for lost time." On Reddit, in a thread titled "Does anyone else not feel the same since 2020?" which accumulated hundreds of responses, one user wrote: "I haven't been the same person ever since 2020. Before then, i used to always go out with friends look to do new things and i was generally outgoing and had a positive outlook and assumption of people. But after the pandemic happened I became much more lonely, not wanting to go out as much and have become much less outgoing and have had a negative outlook on life in general." Another responded: "Felt like we hit a dimensional warp, times going faster, the world is more and more fucked up." A third reported: "Since 2021 I wake up every morning with a sense of doom. Can't shake it. Things just don't feel right."
These are not outliers. They represent a convergent experiential signal that demands explanation rather than dismissal. Historically, human experiential testimony underpinned scientific observation, cultural coordination, and collective sense-making. The philosophical tradition of phenomenology—from Husserl and Heidegger through van Manen—establishes lived experience as a legitimate source of knowledge about consciousness and reality. The systematic dismissal of widespread subjective reports as "mere psychology" constitutes what philosopher Miranda Fricker terms "epistemic injustice"—the systematic devaluation of particular experiences based on prejudice against the testifiers. When millions report temporal disorientation, reality discontinuity, and narrative collapse across independent contexts, this represents a phenomenological signal requiring investigation. One Reddit user expressed the shared frustration with particular clarity: "We globally went through trauma. As a world. It's not being acknowledged or given space to exist and we are expected to just carry on like it never happened. I feel like I've been permanently affected mental health wise and I wish it's something we all talked more about." The convergence of first-person reports with neuroscientific findings, sociological data, and complexity theory validates treating experiential testimony as legitimate evidence of a genuine shift in the structure of lived experience. The question is not whether something changed—it is what mechanisms produced the transformation, and what new world we now inhabit.
## Ontological Destabilization: When Reality Became Negotiable
Before examining the specific mechanisms of temporal, social, and informational disruption, we must address the foundational shift that made all other distortions possible: the destabilization of ontological certainty itself. In normal times, humans operate within what sociologist Anthony Giddens calls "ontological security"—a basic trust that reality is stable, that the world will continue to operate according to comprehensible rules, that one's own identity remains continuous across time. This security is not something most people consciously cultivate; it functions as the invisible infrastructure of daily life, the taken-for-granted assumption that allows us to plan, to trust, to engage with others without constantly questioning whether we share the same basic reality.
The post-2020 condition represents a catastrophic failure of this infrastructure. Ontological security requires what Giddens describes as "practical consciousness"—the ability to carry on with daily routines without consciously questioning their foundation. When the pandemic abruptly halted virtually all routines simultaneously, it exposed the contingency hiding beneath the appearance of permanence. Schools were not eternal institutions; they were social agreements that could be suspended. Offices were not necessary structures; they were habits that could evaporate. Even the boundary between home and world—one of the most fundamental spatial anchors of human life—became permeable, with bedrooms transforming into workplaces and kitchens becoming classrooms. The experience was less like adapting to change and more like discovering that what seemed solid had always been liquid.
This ontological rupture created the conditions for what might be called "ambient unreality"—the persistent sense, reported by millions, that nothing feels quite real anymore. In the *Stranger Things* mythology, those who have been to the Upside Down retain a trace of that dimension even after returning. They can sense things others cannot; they remain connected to the breach. Similarly, those who passed through the threshold of 2020 emerged carrying what phenomenologists might call a "second sight"—an awareness that the apparent solidity of social reality is a construction that can dissolve without warning. This awareness, once gained, cannot be un-gained. It persists as a low-grade ontological anxiety, a perpetual recognition that the ground beneath one's feet is less stable than it once appeared.
The technology-mediated nature of existence during lockdowns intensified this destabilization. Jean Baudrillard's concept of hyperreality—a condition where the distinction between reality and simulation collapses—moved from academic abstraction to lived experience. Millions of workers discovered that their "presence" at work could be simulated through video feeds, that their bodies were not necessary for the performance of their professional identities. Students learned that education could proceed without physical classrooms, that the social rituals of school were separable from their informational content. Religious services, family gatherings, funerals, weddings—all the ceremonies that anchor human life to shared physical reality—migrated into screens, becoming copies without originals. This was not adaptation; it was a fundamental reorganization of the relationship between representation and presence. When the pandemic restrictions eased and people returned to physical spaces, they carried with them the knowledge that their physical presence had been proven dispensable, that their bodies were no longer required for their social functions. This knowledge corroded the sense of groundedness that physical embodiment normally provides.
The acceleration of artificial intelligence during this period compounded the ontological crisis. Before 2020, AI remained largely a specialist concern, confined to technical communities and abstract futurism. By 2024, AI-generated text, images, and video had become ubiquitous, creating what might be called an "epistemic fog"—a condition where the origin and authenticity of any piece of information could no longer be assumed. The boundary between human and machine expression became negotiable in ways that dissolved the basic trust required for communication. If any text might be AI-generated, if any image might be synthetic, if any voice might be cloned, then the very category of "authentic human expression" loses its stable footing. This is not paranoia but rational response to genuine technological transformation. The result is a chronic uncertainty about the source and reliability of information that pervades daily life, intensifying the ambient unreality that characterizes the post-2020 condition.
These overlapping ontological disruptions—the exposure of social reality's contingency, the migration of presence into simulation, the destabilization of authentic expression—created fertile ground for alternative explanatory frameworks to flourish. When the basic coordinates of reality become uncertain, meaning systems that promise to restore coherence become deeply attractive. This is the context in which we must understand the conspiracy ecology that bloomed after 2020: not as random delusion, but as systematic attempts to rebuild ontological security in a world where the foundations had cracked. The Upside Down of post-2020 reality is not defined by any single feature—not by disease, not by political conflict, not by technological change—but by the collapse of the background certainties that normally make coherent experience possible.
## Temporal Disintegration: The 2020 Effect
The most extensively documented phenomenon is what researchers now term the "2020 Effect"—a widespread disruption of time perception with measurable psychological and neurological correlates. Empirical findings reveal that over 65 percent of Americans reported temporal disorientation during the first six months of the pandemic, characterized in psychiatric literature as "temporal disintegration"—impaired sequential thinking and disconnection from temporal continuity. Time perception distortions have been documented to persist years after the acute pandemic phase. As one researcher at the University of Michigan explained, the pandemic "scrunched distance between remembered events" like compressing a slinky, creating the paradoxical sensation where the recent past feels both impossibly distant and uncannily recent.
In *Stranger Things*, time operates differently in the Upside Down. When Will Byers is trapped there, the parallel dimension doesn't follow the same temporal rules as the regular world. He can perceive flickers of the ordinary world but cannot fully inhabit its timeline. He ages, but his connection to normal time becomes tenuous. This narrative device captures something real about the post-2020 experience: time continued to pass, but its passage no longer registered with the same phenomenological weight. The monotony of lockdown created what researchers call "time blindness"—an inability to distinguish one day from another, one week from the next, one month from the previous. The absence of temporal landmarks—those distinctive events that normally punctuate the calendar and allow memory to organize itself—left people floating in an undifferentiated temporal haze.
Multiple research frameworks converge on identifying six distinct phenomenological themes in this temporal disruption. First, there is the temporal rift: a discontinuity between pre-2020 memories and post-2020 experience, creating a sense that one's earlier life belongs to a different person or a different world entirely. Second, temporal vertigo describes the experience of past, present, and future collapsing together, making it difficult to locate oneself within a coherent timeline. Third, impoverished time refers to the thinning out of temporal experience, the sense that time passes without being truly lived. Fourth, tunnel vision describes an inability to perceive the future, a cognitive compression of the time horizon that normally extends before consciousness. Fifth, the destruction of spatial and social scaffolding refers to the elimination of the physical routines and social rituals that normally anchor time perception. Sixth, suspended time describes the sensation of being outside the normal flow of duration entirely, as if placed in temporal stasis.
Each of these themes manifests in conspiracy thinking in specific ways, as we shall examine. Temporal landmarks function as memory scaffolding—distinctive events that allow the brain to encode and retrieve autobiographical memories effectively. Commuting to work, attending classes, celebrating holidays, gathering with friends—these recurring patterns create the texture of remembered time. When they disappear simultaneously, memory formation itself becomes impaired. Studies published during and after the pandemic confirmed that routine disruption correlated with specific cognitive deficits in memory encoding and temporal processing. Neuroscientific research documented changes in hippocampal function during prolonged isolation, with MRI studies revealing gray matter reduction in brain regions associated with temporal processing. This was not subjective distortion but measurable neurological change—the Upside Down had written itself into the tissue of the brain.
The temporal rift created by 2020 has not healed. Four years later, people continue to report the sensation that pre-pandemic memories belong to a different era, a different self. This is not nostalgia in the ordinary sense—the gentle longing for a past that felt continuous with the present. It is something closer to what trauma researchers call "narrative rupture"—a discontinuity in the story of the self that cannot be smoothed over by the passage of time. The self that existed before the breach feels inaccessible, separated not by the normal flow of biography but by a kind of temporal wall. This is why conspiracy theories about timeline shifts—the belief that reality itself was somehow reset, that we slipped into an alternate dimension, that the Mandela Effect represents evidence of temporal manipulation—resonated so powerfully during and after 2020. They provided a framework for naming an experience that conventional explanations could not accommodate: the sense that the past has been genuinely severed from the present, that continuity itself has been broken.
## Fragmentation of Shared Reality: The Hyperreal Condition
Jean Baudrillard argued that in postmodern society, simulation increasingly replaces reality, creating a condition where "the map precedes the territory." His concept of hyperreality—where copies proliferate without originals, where the simulation becomes more real than the real—remained largely theoretical until 2020 demonstrated it experientially. When physical presence was suspended and mediated interaction became the default mode of social existence, humanity underwent a mass experiment in Baudrillardian hyperreality. We discovered that life could continue without physical co-presence, that work could proceed without offices, that relationships could be maintained without touch. The simulation, it turned out, was sufficient—or at least sufficient enough to persist indefinitely.
This discovery was profoundly destabilizing. If your job could be done from anywhere, what had all those hours of commuting meant? If your education could proceed through screens, what was the value of physical classrooms? If your family gatherings could happen over video, what exactly was lost when bodies weren't in the same room? These questions, which might have remained philosophical abstractions, became urgent practical concerns. The apparent redundancy of physical presence called into question the entire infrastructure of embodied social life that had previously seemed necessary. The Upside Down operates through a similar logic of parasitic doubling: it copies the physical world precisely, maintaining the same geography and architecture, but replaces the living substance with something cold, toxic, and fundamentally alien. The familiar becomes uncanny—recognizable but wrong.
The acceleration of AI during this period intensified the hyperreal condition exponentially. Before 2020, AI-generated content remained relatively rare and easily distinguishable from human expression. By 2024, large language models could produce text indistinguishable from human writing, image generators could create photorealistic scenes that never existed, and synthetic voices could clone any speaker with minimal samples. The implications for shared reality are profound. If any image might be generated, any text might be synthetic, any voice might be fabricated, then the basic evidentiary chain linking representation to reality dissolves. We can no longer trust that what we see reflects something that exists, that what we read was written by the person whose name appears, that what we hear corresponds to an actual speaker. This is not a future concern but a present reality, creating chronic uncertainty about the authenticity of any piece of information.
The collapse of shared media environments compounded this fragmentation. Where previous generations consumed information through a handful of shared channels—network news, major newspapers, common cultural reference points—the algorithmic personalization of the 2020s created what might be called "reality silos." Each individual's information diet became increasingly customized, curated by algorithms optimizing for engagement rather than accuracy or shared understanding. Two people living in the same household might inhabit entirely different informational worlds, consuming content that reinforced divergent understandings of basic facts. This was not simply disagreement—humans have always disagreed—but something more fundamental: the disappearance of the common factual ground on which disagreement had previously occurred. Without shared premises, debate becomes impossible. Without shared reality, social coordination breaks down at a foundational level.
The conspiracy ecology that flourished after 2020 must be understood within this context of hyperreality and reality fragmentation. When simulation has proven capable of replacing reality, when authentic expression has become indistinguishable from synthetic generation, when each person's information environment has been algorithmically customized into a private bubble, the very concept of "reality" loses stable meaning. Conspiracy theories are, among other things, attempts to establish alternative shared realities—communities of belief that provide the common ground mainstream consensus can no longer supply. They are symptoms of and responses to the hyperreal condition, attempts to rebuild coherence from fragments. The content of these theories—Satanic elites, hidden messages, timeline manipulations—matters less than the function they serve: creating communities where shared belief provides the ontological security that shared reality once did.
## The Conspiracy Ecology as Meaning-Stabilization System
When the foundations of ordinary reality become uncertain, conspiracy theories function not primarily as explanatory frameworks but as meaning-stabilization systems. They provide what the fractured post-2020 world can no longer reliably supply: temporal structure, moral clarity, a sense of agency, community belonging, coherent identity, and purpose. Each major cluster of 2020-era conspiracy theories addressed specific dimensions of the existential crisis, offering remedies—however illusory—for particular forms of destabilization. To understand this ecology, we must examine not just what these theories claimed but what needs they met and how they intensified the liminal condition they purported to resolve.
### QAnon and the Longing for Hidden Order
At the center of the 2020-2022 conspiracy ecology stood QAnon—an elaborate mythology that promised secret order beneath apparent chaos. Beginning in 2017 with anonymous posts on 4chan, QAnon evolved by 2020 into a comprehensive worldview claiming that Donald Trump was waging a secret war against a global cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles who controlled governments, media, and financial systems worldwide. The movement's central prophecy—"The Storm"—promised imminent mass arrests, military tribunals at Guantánamo Bay, and the revelation that White Hats (military intelligence figures allied with Trump) had been orchestrating events behind the scenes all along.
By 2021, surveys by the Public Religion Research Institute found that roughly 30 million Americans believed in the core QAnon claims, with that number growing slightly in 2022, making QAnon "as popular as some religions," as researchers noted. Twenty percent of respondents agreed that "there is a storm coming soon that will sweep away the elites in power and restore the rightful leaders." The movement spawned an elaborate lexicon and symbology: "Trust the Plan" became a mantra of faith, "WWG1WGA" (Where We Go One, We Go All) functioned as a creed, and the interpretation of "Q drops"—cryptic messages allegedly from a high-ranking military intelligence official—became a kind of exegetical practice reminiscent of Talmudic study or medieval scriptural interpretation.
The QAnon mythology addressed the temporal disruption of 2020 by imposing structure on apparently random events. Where mainstream observers saw chaos, QAnon adherents saw a master plan unfolding according to schedule. Trump's tweets were not random outbursts but coded communications to the initiated. Setbacks were not defeats but strategic misdirection. The failure of prophesied events—mass arrests, the "10 Days of Darkness," the restoration of Trump to power—did not falsify the theory but became further evidence of the plan's depth and patience. "Trust the Plan" functioned as a temporal anchor, assuring believers that even apparent disorder served hidden purposes and that revelation would come soon. This structure made the unbearable uncertainty of 2020 bearable by asserting that someone was in control, even if that control remained invisible to the uninitiated.
The QAnon ecosystem included numerous sub-theories that extended and elaborated the core mythology. Secret sealed indictments—allegedly numbering in the hundreds of thousands—were said to be waiting for the moment of mass arrests. Celebrity ankle monitors were cited as evidence that Hollywood figures were already under house arrest, their freedom merely a performance while the military prepared their tribunals. Mike Flynn's oath mythology reinterpreted the former National Security Advisor's recitation of the QAnon slogan as formal military endorsement of the movement. The claim that JFK Jr. remained alive—having faked his death in 1999 to assist Trump's eventual campaign against the Deep State—peaked with a gathering in Dallas in November 2021 where hundreds waited for his prophesied return. Time travel theories, including "Project Looking Glass," suggested that military technology allowed patriots to see and manipulate future timelines. Each elaboration deepened the mythology, creating an ever-expanding interpretive universe where no fact could contradict the core narrative because any apparent contradiction could be absorbed as further evidence of the conspiracy's depth.
The liminality of these beliefs intensified with each failed prophecy. Anthropologist Victor Turner observed that liminal periods in ritual contexts create a kind of "anti-structure"—a suspension of normal social rules and hierarchies that can be experienced as either liberating or terrifying. QAnon created a permanent liminal space where the old order had definitively ended (the "Great Awakening" had begun) but the new order had not yet fully arrived (the "Storm" remained perpetually imminent). This endless threshold state—always on the verge of transformation but never quite transforming—trapped believers in a chronic anticipation that made ordinary life feel provisional and unreal. Every news event became a potential trigger for the final reckoning; every day might be the day the plan finally revealed itself. This anticipatory tension maintained engagement but also prevented psychological resolution, keeping adherents in a state of suspended normalcy that mirrored and intensified the broader post-2020 condition.
### The Child Trafficking Stack: Moral Clarity Through Horror
Nested within and extending beyond QAnon was a cluster of theories centered on child trafficking and ritual abuse—what might be called the "emotional keystone layer" of the conspiracy ecology. Pizzagate, the claim that Democratic politicians operated a child trafficking ring from a Washington D.C. pizza restaurant, had emerged in 2016 and led to an armed assault on the restaurant by a man intent on rescuing the captive children he believed were held in a basement that did not exist. The theory revived in 2020, merging with QAnon and spawning new iterations. The Wayfair conspiracy of summer 2020 claimed that the furniture retailer was trafficking children through its website, with expensive cabinets and pillows allegedly containing victims whose names matched the product listings. The theory spread so rapidly that Polaris Project, the organization that operates the National Human Trafficking Hotline, reported receiving thousands of calls about the fictional Wayfair scheme—calls that, according to their analysis, consumed resources equivalent to handling 42 actual trafficking cases.
The Wayfair conspiracy demonstrates how these theories functioned as radicalization gateways. Rosanne Boyland, a 34-year-old woman from Kennesaw, Georgia, had shown no particular interest in politics for most of her life. A recovering addict who had never voted before 2020, she stumbled upon Wayfair conspiracy videos during the isolation of the pandemic summer. Her sister Lonna recalled the moment of transformation: Rosanne showed her listings on the Wayfair website, pointing to expensive furniture with names that allegedly matched missing children. "It just spiraled," Lonna told reporters. Within six months, Rosanne had progressed from Wayfair to broader QAnon beliefs, from concerned citizen to true believer in a cosmic war against evil. On January 6, 2021, she traveled to Washington D.C. to support Trump's effort to overturn the election results. She died that day, trapped in the crush of rioters attempting to force their way past police lines at the Capitol. Her family believes she was radicalized "in a very short time inside of 6 months"—a trajectory from apolitical to fanatic accelerated by the unique conditions of pandemic isolation and the algorithmic amplification of conspiracy content.
The child trafficking theories addressed the moral disorientation of the pandemic period by providing absolute moral clarity. In a world where every decision seemed ethically fraught—whether to wear masks, whether to see family, whether to trust authorities—these theories offered a simple binary: there were those who were fighting to save children, and there were those who were complicit in their abuse. The horror of the claims—adrenochrome harvesting (the belief that elites extracted a chemical compound from the blood of terrified children), Satanic rituals, underground prisons—functioned not as deterrents but as intensifiers of moral commitment. If such evil existed, then any action taken against it was justified. The greater the horror, the more urgent the call to action.
Related theories extended the child trafficking framework into a comprehensive mythology of elite depravity. "Save the Children" hashtags, appropriated from legitimate anti-trafficking efforts, became recruitment tools for broader conspiracy engagement. Hollywood was reimagined as a factory of Satanic ritual and child abuse, with every awards ceremony analyzed for occult symbolism and every celebrity gesture interpreted as secret confession. The Hampstead case from the UK and the McMartin Preschool panic of the 1980s were revived as evidence of ongoing, systematic abuse that mainstream society refused to acknowledge. The historical pattern is significant: the Satanic Panic of the 1980s and early 1990s, now understood as a mass hysteria that destroyed innocent lives through false accusations, returned in digital form during 2020, fueled by the same psychological dynamics but amplified by social media's reach and algorithmic engagement optimization.
The liminal function of these theories was to place believers in a permanent state of moral emergency. Like Turner's ritual subjects, they existed outside ordinary social norms—the normal rules of evidence, civility, and proportionate response were suspended in the face of absolute evil. This liminal state explained why family members reported such dramatic personality changes in their conspiracy-believing relatives: the sense of fighting a cosmic battle against child-sacrificing Satanists made ordinary concerns seem trivial and ordinary people seem complicit. The theories created communities of the elect who alone perceived the true horror beneath the surface of normal life—a form of gnosis that simultaneously elevated believers above the "sheeple" who remained asleep and isolated them from anyone who questioned their beliefs.
### The Plandemic Layer: Temporal Rupture as Intentional Design
The pandemic itself became the subject of elaborate conspiracy theorizing that specifically addressed the temporal rupture of 2020 by reframing it as intentional. If the disruption of normal life was not accident but design, then it could be understood, resisted, and potentially reversed. The most influential expression of this reframing was "Plandemic," a documentary that accumulated over eight million views before being removed from major platforms. The film presented the pandemic as a coordinated operation by global elites, featuring discredited researcher Judy Mikovits claiming that COVID-19 had been deliberately engineered and that the response was orchestrated to consolidate power and control.
The "plandemic" framework absorbed and organized numerous specific claims. COVID-19 was said to have been intentionally released, either from a laboratory leak or through deliberate deployment as a bioweapon. The virus was variously claimed to be exaggerated or entirely fake, with the "#FilmYourHospital" movement encouraging people to document empty hospital parking lots as evidence that the crisis was manufactured. Death counts were said to be inflated, with doctors allegedly incentivized to classify all deaths as COVID-related. Ventilators were accused of killing patients who would otherwise have recovered. Each of these claims provided a framework for understanding the unprecedented disruption of normal life: if the pandemic was fake or exaggerated, then the suffering and isolation had been unnecessary—imposed not by an uncontrollable virus but by authorities with ulterior motives.
The liminality intensified through pandemic conspiracy theories because they placed believers in direct conflict with the measures designed to end the crisis. If masks were instruments of social control rather than public health measures, then wearing one represented submission to tyranny. If vaccines were instruments of population control—containing microchips, altering DNA, causing sterilization, or containing graphene oxide that would activate in response to 5G signals—then accepting vaccination meant becoming complicit in one's own subjection. The theory that 5G cellular technology caused or activated COVID-19 led to arson attacks on cell towers in the UK and elsewhere, demonstrating how conspiracy beliefs translated into physical action. Each such theory extended the liminal period by opposing the measures that might have allowed return to normalcy, ensuring that believers remained in an extended state of resistance and vigilance.
The pandemic conspiracy cluster specifically addressed the ontological destabilization described earlier by reframing it as evidence of conspiracy. The surreal quality of lockdown—the empty streets, the masked faces, the social distancing that made human contact seem dangerous—was not a collective response to genuine emergency but a coordinated performance designed to reshape society. This reframing provided a strange comfort: if the strangeness was intentional, then it could be understood; if it was orchestrated, then those who recognized the orchestration possessed knowledge that restored their agency in a world that seemed to have stripped all agency away. The cost of this comfort was permanent opposition to the conditions of ordinary life, a refusal to trust any institutional guidance, and increasing isolation from those who did not share the conspiratorial framework.
### State Power and Authoritarian Futures: The Biopolitical Anxiety Layer
A distinct cluster of theories addressed fears of authoritarian transformation, interpreting pandemic responses as steps toward permanent totalitarian control. FEMA camps—a conspiracy theory dating to the 1980s claiming that the Federal Emergency Management Agency was constructing concentration camps for American citizens—experienced revival during 2020, with quarantine facilities reimagined as the first stage of mass detention. The "Great Reset," a genuine initiative by the World Economic Forum proposing to restructure post-pandemic economies toward sustainability and stakeholder capitalism, was reinterpreted as a blueprint for global totalitarianism, with Klaus Schwab cast as the chief architect of a new world order. Vaccine passports were framed not as temporary public health measures but as permanent digital ID systems that would enable Chinese-style social credit scoring in Western democracies.
The conspiracy theories around state power specifically addressed the genuine expansion of government authority during the pandemic by extending it to apocalyptic conclusions. Lockdowns became "obedience training." Mask mandates became "social conditioning." Digital contact tracing became permanent surveillance. Emergency powers became permanent martial law. Each interpretation took a real phenomenon—the expansion of state power during crisis—and projected it into a dystopian future where the crisis would never end because the crisis was the point. This catastrophizing made it impossible to evaluate pandemic measures on their own terms; every policy was interpreted as a step toward the final destination of total control.
The liminal function of these theories was to maintain a permanent state of emergency vigilance even as the immediate pandemic crisis receded. Agenda 21, a non-binding UN resolution from 1992 on sustainable development, was reinterpreted as a plan for forced urbanization and depopulation. Agenda 2030, the UN Sustainable Development Goals, was presented as the updated timeline for global implementation. The "cashless society" was predicted as imminent, with the elimination of physical currency enabling total government control of all economic transactions. Each of these theories created temporal extension—the threat was not just present but endlessly impending, requiring perpetual alertness that made it impossible to return to ordinary life. The liminal subject, in Turner's formulation, exists outside normal social structure; the conspiracy believer in this cluster remained perpetually outside the normal relationship to government, unable to trust any institutional action as genuine.
### Technology, Simulation, and Post-Human Anxiety: The Ontological Destabilization Layer
A distinct cluster of theories directly addressed the ontological destabilization that characterized the post-2020 condition, translating ambient feelings of unreality into specific claims about the nature of reality itself. The idea that "we are in a simulation"—a philosophical hypothesis debated seriously by figures like Nick Bostrom and Elon Musk—migrated from academic speculation to experiential conviction for many during the pandemic. If life could feel so unreal, perhaps that was because it genuinely was unreal, a simulation whose boundaries had become visible during the stress of crisis. "Reality reset after 2012" referenced the Mayan calendar prophecies and reframed subsequent history as occurring in a new, degraded timeline. CERN, the particle physics laboratory in Switzerland, was said to have "opened portals" through its experiments, creating rifts between dimensions that explained the sense of wrongness pervading post-2020 experience.
The Mandela Effect—the phenomenon where groups of people share false memories, such as remembering the Berenstain Bears as "Berenstein Bears"—exploded in salience during this period. What had been a curious internet subculture became, for many, evidence of timeline manipulation or reality shifting. If the past itself could change, if memories of a different reality were traces of that reality's genuine existence, then the sense that the world had fundamentally altered was not psychological but ontological. The theory provided a framework for the experience of temporal rupture: the past really was different, not because memory was fallible but because reality itself had changed.
These theories explicitly addressed the hyperreal condition by naming it. NPC theory—the idea that some humans are not genuinely conscious but merely "non-player characters" running on autopilot, like background figures in video games—articulated the sense of disconnection from other people that intensified during pandemic isolation. If social media interactions felt hollow, if other people seemed to be following scripts rather than genuinely thinking, perhaps that was because they were simulated consciousness rather than the real thing. Claims about "replicants among us," "clones of celebrities," and "synthetic humans" extended this framework, suggesting that the boundary between human and artificial had already been breached without public acknowledgment.
The overlap with mainstream entertainment is significant here. *Westworld*, *Ex Machina*, *Black Mirror*, *Upload*, the *Blade Runner* revival—these narratives did not cause conspiracy beliefs but resonated with them, providing narrative templates for anxieties about the boundary between human and artificial that were already intensifying. The theories in this cluster functioned as attempts to make sense of the uncanny quality of post-2020 experience by naming its cause: reality itself had been compromised, hacked, replaced, or simulated. This naming provided a strange reassurance—if the wrongness had a cause, it could be understood, and perhaps resisted. But the liminal effect was profound: believing that reality was simulated or compromised made it impossible to trust any experience, any relationship, any institution, any perception. The conspiracy became total, encompassing reality itself.
### Celebrity, Illuminati, and Cultural Symbolism: The Semiotic Paranoia Layer
The entertainment industry provided endless material for a cluster of theories focused on symbol interpretation and elite signaling. The Illuminati—a Bavarian secret society disbanded in 1785—was resurrected as an umbrella term for the shadowy elites allegedly controlling global affairs. Freemasonry, Bohemian Grove, and other organizations with genuine historical existence were woven into narratives of secret power. Celebrity behavior became a text to be decoded: Lady Gaga's imagery was analyzed for Satanic content, Beyoncé's hand gestures were interpreted as Illuminati signals, Justin Bieber was cast as an MK-Ultra victim (referencing CIA mind control experiments from the Cold War era), and Kanye West's erratic public statements were read alternately as cries for help from within the system or as deliberate truth-telling by someone who had seen behind the curtain.
Award shows and galas became sites of particular interpretive intensity. The Met Gala was analyzed as a Satanic ceremony, with costume choices decoded as ritual elements. Music videos were scrutinized frame-by-frame for hidden symbolism, with any eye imagery, pyramid shape, or unusual hand position catalogued as evidence of Illuminati affiliation. This "semiotic paranoia"—the conviction that hidden meanings lurked everywhere, visible only to those who knew how to look—created an endless supply of "evidence" that could be compiled, shared, and debated across social media platforms.
The liminal function of this interpretive mode was to transform passive entertainment consumption into active meaning-making. Where ordinary viewers watched music videos for enjoyment, conspiracy believers engaged in a kind of detective work, finding patterns that others missed and sharing discoveries with communities of the similarly awakened. This transformation addressed the powerlessness many felt during the pandemic by providing a sense of agency and expertise. The ordinary world might be beyond control, but the symbolic world could be mastered through sufficient attention and knowledge. The cost was an inability to consume any cultural product innocently—every piece of entertainment became a potential site of hidden messaging, requiring vigilant interpretation rather than simple enjoyment.
### Financial Mythology: The Invisible Power Layer
A distinct cluster addressed economic anxieties through theories about financial systems and hidden wealth. Central banks were cast as the true seat of power, with the Federal Reserve reimagined as an enemy institution serving foreign interests rather than American welfare. The gold standard restoration was predicted as imminent, promising to restore sound money and undermine the supposed manipulation of fiat currency by global elites. Cryptocurrency was positioned as liberation from this system—a technology that could bypass traditional financial control and restore economic sovereignty to individuals.
The Panama Papers revelations and other genuine exposés of offshore wealth were absorbed into broader narratives about systematic corruption, where the documented examples became evidence of a much larger hidden structure. Nonprofits were reimagined as fronts for money laundering or worse. Corporate structures were analyzed for hidden ownership patterns suggesting coordination among seemingly independent entities. The documented existence of genuine financial crimes—which is extensive—provided a foundation of factual credibility on which more elaborate theories could be constructed.
The liminal function of financial conspiracy theories was to explain the persistent economic insecurity that characterized the post-2008 and especially post-2020 economy. If wages had stagnated while costs rose, if homeownership had become increasingly inaccessible, if economic precarity had become the norm for younger generations, then perhaps this was not accident but design. Financial conspiracy theories offered the comfort of intention where random market forces offered only chaos. This explanation addressed the temporal dimension by placing contemporary difficulties within a long historical arc of deliberate manipulation, providing narrative coherence to experiences of economic displacement that otherwise seemed inexplicable.
### Hybrid and Ambient Beliefs: The Pervasive Atmosphere
Beyond the distinct clusters, a layer of what might be called "ambient beliefs" pervaded the post-2020 environment—not specific theories but general orientations that made conspiracy thinking seem natural. "Nothing is real anymore" expressed the ontological destabilization in its purest form. "You can't trust anything" articulated the collapse of epistemic authority. "Mainstream media lies about everything" framed institutional information sources as actively deceptive rather than merely limited. "Everyone is in on it" expressed the paranoid totalization where no one outside the conspiracy community could be trusted. "Truth is hidden in plain sight" justified the interpretive practices that found hidden meanings everywhere. "If you don't see it, you're asleep" established the gnostic distinction between the awakened few and the sleeping masses. "Something shifted" and "Reality feels off" named the phenomenological experience without specifying its cause, creating openness to various explanatory frameworks.
These ambient beliefs functioned as the atmosphere within which specific conspiracy theories could breathe. They did not require commitment to any particular claim but established a general orientation of suspicion toward official narratives and openness to alternative explanations. Someone who believed that "you can't trust anything" was primed to receive specific claims about what was being hidden; someone who felt that "something shifted" was ready to accept theories about what caused the shift. This atmospheric layer was perhaps the most significant and lasting effect of the 2020-2022 period, creating a general condition of epistemic uncertainty that persisted long after specific conspiracy theories had waxed and waned.
The liminal quality of these ambient beliefs is total. They describe not a transition between states but a permanent condition of betweenness—neither trusting nor fully distrusting, neither within mainstream consensus nor fully committed to alternative frameworks, perpetually uncertain about what is real and what is fabricated. This ambient liminality may be the defining feature of post-2020 consciousness for millions, a chronic condition of ontological insecurity that specific conspiracy theories temporarily relieve but ultimately intensify.
## The Casualties: When the Upside Down Consumed Families
The conspiracy ecology of 2020-2022 left a trail of destruction that is only beginning to be documented. Families were torn apart. Marriages ended. Children became estranged from parents. Friendships dissolved. The intimate relationships that form the social fabric of human life proved no match for belief systems that demanded total commitment and framed any dissent as complicity with evil. The scope of this damage is difficult to quantify but the qualitative evidence is overwhelming—a wave of human suffering that accompanies the better-documented political and epistemological effects of the conspiracy moment.
The subreddit r/QAnonCasualties became a digital refuge for those whose loved ones had been consumed by conspiracy thinking. Founded in 2020, the community grew from 28,000 members in October of that year to 137,000 by March 2021, continuing to expand as the phenomenon persisted. By 2024, researchers analyzing over 75,000 sentences from the forum identified 58 distinct categories of family-related discussion, documenting what one researcher called "one of the most comprehensive portraits to date of the interpersonal consequences of conspiracy belief." The posts reveal a consistent pattern: personality changes in believers, emotional and physical distance, intense conflict, and varied attempts at reconciliation that more often failed than succeeded.
The testimonies from family members carry the weight of genuine grief. "I am devastated. I have lost my family. I am grieving the living," wrote one poster, capturing the particular pain of losing someone to ideology rather than death. A British woman named Tasha wrote: "He has cut off his brothers and sister. He shares the most vile things on Facebook. He's turning into a vile, hate-filled man. I have such a hatred for the architects of QAnon, because their lies have broken my family." Another described living with a QAnon-believing spouse: "QAnon has destroyed my life. I live with someone who hates me." The pattern repeated across thousands of accounts: people watching their loved ones transform into strangers, their relationships becoming unrecognizable, their families fragmenting along lines of belief.
The stories told to journalists reveal the mechanisms of destruction. Austin, a 41-year-old artist from New England, was described by his ex-wife Emily as "the most laid-back person I had ever met—until he was radicalized by QAnon." His personality transformed: "He was really angry about Hillary Clinton but also angry about people who cut him off in traffic. His entire personality changed." The marriage ended, but Austin remained so absorbed in conspiracy thinking that, according to Emily, "It took me four different conversations about me divorcing him for it to stick. He would bring up Trump during our conversations about our marriage ending." The relationship had become impossible because Austin was no longer present in it—his attention, his emotional energy, his capacity for ordinary intimacy had all been consumed by the alternative reality he now inhabited.
Elena's marriage to Mark ended after he entered her Chicago home carrying a machete—the culmination of a radicalization that began with 9/11 conspiracy videos on YouTube and progressed through Alex Jones, Trump's Twitter feed, Obama conspiracies, Hillary Clinton's emails, and finally QAnon, "which is where everything finally fell into place for Mark." Despite his master's degree in economics, his military service, his healthcare career—despite all the markers of a stable, educated life—Mark had become unrecognizable to the woman who had been married to him for twenty years. "I don't know how he found QAnon, or 4chan, but to him, it was the place where everything made sense, and he met like-minded people who reinforced the conspiracies," Elena explained. The machete represented the logical endpoint of a worldview that framed ordinary life as a battleground between absolute good and absolute evil.
Adam's wife began telling him "that we needed to start amassing guns, that we needed to start converting our currency into gold and silver because when the Civil War happens, we need to have something to trade with other people. The adrenochrome, the pedophile rings—she was a believer that Tom Hanks was a pedophile, and it got to a point where I couldn't watch the national nightly news without her believing I was giving in to the liberals." Another woman reported that her husband spent "16 to 18 hours a day consuming this" content, his entire waking life absorbed by the conspiracy ecosystem. The pattern suggests addiction as much as belief—a compulsive engagement that crowded out all other relationships and concerns.
The lockdown conditions of 2020 proved ideal for this kind of radicalization. People stuck at home, isolated from the social contacts that normally provided reality checks, turned to screens for connection and stimulation. Algorithms optimized for engagement fed increasingly extreme content to those who showed interest, creating feedback loops that intensified belief while isolating believers from contradicting perspectives. "To many, time became an abundant commodity," observed one reporter covering the phenomenon. "And for Rosanne that was time spent preoccupied with QAnon." The isolation that was supposed to protect physical health created conditions that devastated psychological and social health, providing unlimited access to radicalizing content while removing the in-person relationships that might have pulled people back.
The divorce statistics from 2020-2021 present a paradox that illuminates the depth of the crisis. Official divorce rates actually fell during the pandemic—there were approximately 12% fewer divorces in 2020 than expected based on pre-pandemic trends. But this decline reflected logistical barriers rather than relationship health: courts were closed, lawyers were inaccessible, and the practical difficulties of separation during lockdown were enormous. Divorce enquiries to family law firms increased dramatically—one UK firm reported a 122% increase between June and October 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. The demand for divorce vastly exceeded the capacity to process divorces, suggesting a backlog of relationship destruction that would manifest fully only as restrictions eased.
Some marriages survived—barely. One woman described her experience: "It absolutely ripped our marriage apart and drove us to the brink of divorce. I've been in a lot of therapy with my husband and we've worked through our relationship, and we've come through stronger because of it, but I will regret for the rest of my life the day I sat there and looked at my husband's face and said 'I choose QAnon over you.'" The admission is remarkable for its honesty: at the height of her immersion in conspiracy thinking, the belief system had become more important than her marriage, more real than her actual relationship. Recovery required therapy, commitment, and the painful acknowledgment of what the conspiracy had nearly cost.
Many families found no such resolution. Parents stopped speaking to children. Siblings cut ties. Adult children watched their aging parents disappear into alternative realities from which they could not be retrieved. As one moderator of r/QAnonCasualties reflected after five years of reading these stories: "The difficult reality for me to really accept was that it was impossible to change someone's mind about things." The community's tagline—"Learn how to steer them back to reality and heal yourself"—had given way to a grimmer wisdom: sometimes the lost cannot be found, and the task becomes not rescue but survival.
The scale of this destruction remains difficult to assess. Tens of millions of Americans believe in some elements of the QAnon mythology. Each believer exists within networks of family, friendship, and community. The ripples of radicalization spread outward, touching people who never themselves fell into conspiracy thinking but who lost someone who did. This secondary trauma—the grief, confusion, anger, and helplessness of watching a loved one transform—affected far more people than the conspiracy believers themselves. The Upside Down did not just claim those who entered it willingly; it reached through the breach to wound those who remained in ordinary reality, connected to the lost by bonds of love that conspiracy thinking strained but could not entirely sever.
## Liminality: The Threshold That Never Ended
All of these phenomena—temporal disruption, reality fragmentation, ontological destabilization, conspiracy proliferation, relationship destruction—converge on a single concept that provides the theoretical framework for understanding the post-2020 condition: liminality. The term derives from the Latin "limen," meaning threshold, and was developed by anthropologist Arnold van Gennep in his 1909 study of rites of passage. Victor Turner expanded and refined the concept through his fieldwork among the Ndembu people of Zambia, developing what became one of the most influential frameworks in social anthropology for understanding transitional states.
Van Gennep identified three phases in rites of passage: separation, liminality, and reincorporation. In the separation phase, individuals are removed from their ordinary social position—the initiate is taken from the community, the bride leaves her family, the mourner is set apart from normal life. In the liminal phase, the individual exists in a threshold state, neither in their old position nor yet in their new one—a condition Turner characterized as "betwixt and between." In the reincorporation phase, the individual returns to society in their new status—the initiate becomes an adult, the bride becomes a wife, the mourner re-enters community life.
Turner's innovation was to recognize that the liminal phase possessed distinctive characteristics that were not merely transitional but constitutive—that something happened in liminality that made the entire process meaningful. Liminal subjects, he observed, were "neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial." This ambiguity was expressed through "a rich variety of symbols"—liminal people might wear special clothing, use special language, occupy special spaces, follow special rules. The normal structures of society were suspended, creating what Turner called "anti-structure"—a condition where hierarchy dissolved and participants experienced "communitas," a profound sense of equality and connection that transcended ordinary social divisions.
The liminal period was traditionally bounded and temporary. The initiate emerged as an adult; the wedding concluded and ordinary life resumed; the mourning period ended and the bereaved returned to normal function. The power of liminality derived in part from its temporariness—it was a passage through transformation, not a permanent condition. Turner recognized that some societies developed what he called "normative communitas"—attempts to institutionalize the liminal experience, to make the anti-structural state permanent. But these attempts typically failed or transformed into new structures, because pure liminality cannot sustain itself indefinitely without resolution.
The post-2020 condition represents an unprecedented collective liminality without clear reincorporation phase. The entire world was separated from normal existence in March 2020. The liminal phase—characterized by ambiguity, suspended rules, unclear duration, dissolution of normal structures—began immediately. But the reincorporation phase has not clearly occurred. Lockdowns ended, restrictions lifted, vaccines were distributed, but the sense of having completed a passage and returned to normal has not materialized. Instead, the threshold persists—extended indefinitely without resolution.
This perpetual liminality manifests in the aesthetic phenomena that emerged during and after the pandemic. "Liminal spaces"—photographs of empty malls, fluorescent-lit corridors, abandoned swimming pools, vacant hotel lobbies—became a widespread internet aesthetic. These images capture spaces designed for human occupation now devoid of people, their purpose suspended, their meaning hollowed out. The appeal of these images derived from their resonance with felt experience: the entire world had become a liminal space, a setting designed for life that had been emptied of its usual activity and meaning.
Turner observed that liminal periods were often characterized by experiences of danger, difficulty, and transformation. The dissolution of normal structure created both opportunity and threat—opportunity for new forms of social organization to emerge, threat from the chaos that unfettered liminality could unleash. Initiation rituals often involved ordeals—pain, deprivation, fear—that marked the significance of the transition and bound participants together in shared experience. The pandemic provided this ordeal involuntarily: the fear of disease, the grief of loss, the difficulty of isolation, the economic devastation, the political conflict. But where traditional ordeals had clear endpoints—the initiate was scarified, the fast concluded, the vigil ended—the pandemic ordeal continued indefinitely, its endpoints repeatedly postponed, its conclusion never clearly marked.
The conspiracy ecology emerged as a response to this extended liminality. Turner noted that liminal periods required symbolic frameworks to make them meaningful—rituals, myths, specialized knowledge that explained what was happening and what it meant. In traditional societies, these frameworks were provided by established cultural traditions. In 2020, millions of people entered a liminal phase without adequate traditional frameworks for understanding it. The conspiracy theories that proliferated served as improvisational myths, providing narrative structure for an experience that mainstream frameworks could not adequately explain. QAnon's "Storm" prophecy was a myth of reincorporation—the promise that the liminal phase would end, that transformation would be completed, that a new order would emerge. Its perpetual deferral kept believers in permanent liminality, always on the threshold of transformation that never quite arrived.
The failure of reincorporation has profound implications. Traditional liminality ended with return to society in a new status—the transformation was completed, the passage concluded, normal life resumed in a new form. Post-2020 liminality has not concluded because no new form has stabilized. We are neither in the old world nor in a clearly defined new one; we inhabit the threshold itself, a permanent in-between that conventional frameworks do not recognize or address. This is what distinguishes the post-2020 condition from temporary crisis: not the severity of disruption but the absence of resolution, not the depth of transformation but its incompleteness. The Upside Down opened in 2020. It has not closed. We remain in the threshold, waiting for a reincorporation that may never come in the form we expect.
## The Convergence: Polycrisis, Metacrisis, Permacrisis
The post-2020 condition cannot be explained by any single disruption because it represents the convergence of multiple crises operating simultaneously across different domains. Researchers have developed new terminology to capture this phenomenon. "Polycrisis" describes the entanglement of multiple global crises—health, economic, political, environmental, social—where each crisis amplifies the others and none can be addressed in isolation. "Metacrisis" goes further, describing not just multiple simultaneous crises but a crisis in our capacity to perceive and respond to crisis—a breakdown of the sense-making systems that would normally allow societies to identify problems and coordinate solutions. "Permacrisis"—selected as Collins Dictionary's 2022 word of the year—captures the temporal dimension: not a crisis that will be resolved but an ongoing, permanent condition of crisis without foreseeable end.
These terms approach what might be called "hyperobjects"—philosopher Timothy Morton's concept for phenomena so vast in temporal and spatial scale that they exceed human comprehension. Climate change is the paradigmatic hyperobject: it occurs over centuries, affects every location on Earth, operates through causal chains too complex for direct perception, and cannot be addressed through normal human action. The post-2020 crisis has hyperobject qualities: it is global, it involves multiple interacting systems, its causes and effects are distributed across scales that defy intuitive understanding, and it has no clear boundaries in time or space.
The sense-making crisis at the heart of the metacrisis directly addresses why conspiracy theories flourished. Psychologist Karl Weick identified seven properties that enable sense-making: identity (knowing who you are), retrospect (understanding your past), enactment (shaping your environment through action), social interaction (coordinating understanding with others), ongoing experience (continuous updating of understanding), extracted cues (identifying relevant signals amid noise), and plausibility (developing explanations that are good enough to act on). The post-2020 disruption attacked all seven simultaneously. Identity became uncertain as social roles dissolved. Retrospect became unreliable as temporal perception distorted. Enactment became impossible during lockdowns. Social interaction moved online and became mediated. Ongoing experience was interrupted and fragmented. Cues multiplied beyond processing capacity. Plausibility collapsed as events exceeded all normal expectations.
When sense-making systems fail comprehensively, any meaning-making framework becomes attractive. Conspiracy theories provided what mainstream frameworks could not: coherent narratives that organized chaos into pattern, named causes for effects, and offered agency to those who felt powerless. The inadequacy of these explanations was less important than their functionality—they made action possible, community possible, continued existence possible in a world that had become incomprehensible. This is not to defend the conspiracy theories but to understand them: they emerged to fill a vacuum created by the failure of legitimate sense-making institutions to provide frameworks adequate to the scale and complexity of what was occurring.
The concept of "phase transition" from complexity science provides another framework for understanding the shift. In physics, phase transitions occur when systems undergo fundamental reorganization—water becoming ice, or ice becoming water vapor. These transitions involve not gradual change but sudden shifts from one state to another, passing through threshold points where the system's behavior becomes temporarily unpredictable. Applying this concept to social systems suggests that 2020 may have represented a phase transition: a threshold point at which the prior organization of society became unstable and began reorganizing into a new configuration whose final form remains unclear. The strange behaviors observed during and after 2020—the temporal distortions, the reality fragmentation, the meaning collapse, the conspiracy proliferation—may be phenomena characteristic of phase transition, the turbulence of a system passing through fundamental reorganization.
## The Meaning Crisis and Collective Trauma
The post-2020 phenomenological shift intersects with what philosopher John Vervaeke has called the "meaning crisis"—a condition specific to modernity where the traditional sources of meaning, purpose, and significance have eroded without replacement. Vervaeke traces this crisis through historical watershed moments: the death of Socrates and the beginning of philosophical doubt, the fall of Rome and the loss of classical civilization, the Protestant Reformation and the fragmentation of unified Christendom, the Scientific Revolution and the "disenchantment of the world" that eliminated supernatural explanatory frameworks. Each transition left humanity with fewer sources of reliable meaning, fewer frameworks for understanding existence and finding purpose within it.
The 2020 disruption accelerated and intensified this crisis. Religious institutions, already declining in influence, were unable to provide adequate frameworks for understanding a global pandemic that struck with apparent randomness and resisted moral interpretation. Scientific institutions, though trusted for medical guidance, could not address the existential questions that the pandemic raised. Political institutions became sites of conflict rather than sources of coherence. Economic institutions revealed their fragility in the face of disruption. The frameworks that remained were insufficient to the scale of the challenge, leaving millions without adequate meaning-making resources precisely when such resources were most desperately needed.
Collective trauma theory provides another lens. Trauma occurs when events exceed the capacity of individuals or communities to integrate them into coherent narratives. Individual trauma shatters the continuity of the self; collective trauma tears the social fabric that allows communities to make sense of shared experience. The pandemic was a collective trauma event on a global scale—not just for those who lost loved ones or suffered severe illness, but for entire populations who experienced prolonged fear, isolation, uncertainty, and the dissolution of normal life. The trauma was not only in the deaths but in the disruption of the rituals that normally accompany death, the inability to gather for funerals, the forced isolation of the dying from their loved ones.
Trauma research demonstrates that unprocessed trauma manifests in persistent symptoms: flashbacks, avoidance, emotional numbness, hypervigilance, distortions of memory and time. The widespread reports from post-2020 populations—chronic doom, persistent anxiety, temporal distortion, emotional deadening, difficulty connecting with others—match the symptom profile of trauma precisely. The difference is that this trauma was collective, experienced not by isolated individuals but by entire societies simultaneously. The normal resources for trauma processing—community support, ritual acknowledgment, collective mourning, gradual return to routine—were themselves disrupted by the conditions that caused the trauma. We were traumatized in isolation and then expected to process that trauma while the isolating conditions persisted.
The conspiracy theories that flourished during this period can be understood as trauma responses. Trauma often generates magical thinking—the need to find meaning in meaningless suffering, to identify causes that could have been prevented, to regain a sense of control over events that felt uncontrollable. The elaborate causal frameworks of QAnon, the demonization of specific figures held responsible for suffering, the belief that hidden knowledge could restore agency—all of these are characteristic of traumatic stress responses generalized to a collective scale. This does not excuse the harmful consequences of conspiracy thinking, but it provides a more compassionate framework for understanding how and why millions of people embraced beliefs that seemed, from outside, obviously false. They were not simply credulous or stupid; they were traumatized people seeking frameworks that their broken world could no longer provide.
## Solastalgia: Mourning a Home That Has Changed
Environmental philosopher Glenn Albrecht developed the concept of "solastalgia" to name a particular form of distress: the homesickness experienced when one is still at home, the grief of watching one's familiar environment transform into something unrecognizable. The term was developed in the context of environmental degradation—mining communities whose landscapes were destroyed, coastal areas altered by rising seas, regions transformed by climate change—but its application extends to any situation where the familiar becomes alien without physical displacement.
Post-2020 experience carries a strong solastalgia component. People returned to their offices, their schools, their communities, but these familiar places no longer felt the same. The café where you once met friends now felt vaguely unsafe. The grocery store where you once shopped without thought now triggered vigilance. The social gatherings that once felt natural now felt performative or anxious. Nothing had physically changed—the buildings stood, the spaces remained—but the experiential quality of inhabiting these spaces had transformed. This is solastalgia on a civilizational scale: the entire human-built environment had been semantically contaminated, its associations altered, its feel fundamentally different.
Climate grief compounds this solastalgia, creating a layered condition of loss. The ecological crisis that was already generating anxiety and mourning before 2020 did not pause during the pandemic; it continued to accelerate, generating record temperatures, extreme weather events, ecosystem collapse, and the growing recognition that the natural world inherited from previous generations was passing away. The pandemic provided a temporary distraction from this background grief, but the underlying condition persisted and intensified. Emerging from the acute phase of the pandemic, many people found that the climate crisis had worsened, that the window for adequate response had narrowed, that the losses they had already been mourning had accelerated.
The combination of pandemic disruption and ecological awareness created a compound condition of grief without clear object. The losses were diffuse—not the death of a specific person or the destruction of a specific place, but the general erosion of the conditions that had made ordinary life possible and the future imaginable. This grief resisted the normal processing that accompanies specific losses because there was no clear endpoint, no funeral after which mourning could begin to resolve, no memorial that could contain and conclude the experience. The grief became ambient, a constant background condition that colored all experience without ever crystallizing into an emotion that could be fully felt and therefore released.
## The Fourth Turning and Historical Pattern
Generational theorists William Strauss and Neil Howe proposed a cyclical model of history in which American society passes through recurring four-phase cycles, each lasting roughly 80-100 years. The fourth phase—the "Fourth Turning"—is characterized by crisis, the destruction of established institutions, and the forging of new social order from the ashes of the old. According to their schema, American history has passed through Fourth Turnings corresponding to the American Revolution, the Civil War, and World War II. The current Fourth Turning, they predicted in their 1997 book, would occur around 2020.
The model is controversial and should not be taken as predictive science, but its conceptual framework provides a lens for understanding the post-2020 moment. Fourth Turnings, in Strauss and Howe's analysis, involve the destruction of compromised institutions, the reconfiguration of social relationships, and the emergence of new collective identities through shared crisis. The period is dangerous—previous Fourth Turnings involved revolution and war—but also potentially generative, creating the conditions for new social orders to emerge from the ruins of the old.
Whether or not the specific cyclical model is accurate, the phenomenology matches. The post-2020 world is characterized by precisely the dynamics Strauss and Howe associated with Fourth Turnings: collapsing institutional legitimacy, intensifying generational conflict, erosion of shared identity, and the sense that fundamental transformation is underway. The conspiracy ecology can be understood as a product of this transition moment—attempts to make sense of the destruction of the old order and to imagine what the new order might be. QAnon's "Storm" is a Fourth Turning narrative in apocalyptic register; the Great Reset conspiracy reimagines institutional transformation as sinister design; the ambient belief that "something shifted" registers the transition without naming its destination.
## Conclusion: Learning to Inhabit the Transformed World
The evidence overwhelmingly supports that something fundamental shifted after 2020. This was not mass delusion but genuine phase transition in the structure of human lived experience—driven by compound convergence of neurological, temporal, social, technological, informational, systemic, and existential transformations operating simultaneously. The widespread perception that "reality changed" reflects accurate phenomenological registration of this multi-level systemic transformation. The challenge now is not to "solve" or "fix" what changed—attempting to restore pre-2020 conditions may be neither possible nor desirable. Instead, the task involves acknowledging the transformation by validating collective experiential testimony rather than gaslighting populations reporting the shift, understanding the mechanisms by continuing research into how structural changes produce phenomenological alterations, developing adaptive capacity by creating new practices, institutions, and frameworks suited for permanent complexity, finding meaning in the transition by recognizing that transformation itself can be source of purpose and identity, and building collective resilience by strengthening social bonds, shared narratives, and mutual support for navigating ongoing uncertainty.
We are not "recovering from" 2020—we are learning to inhabit a fundamentally transformed world. The sooner we accept this reality and develop adaptive responses, the better equipped we will be to navigate the continuing metacrisis. The widespread feeling that "something changed" is not pathology requiring treatment but recognition requiring integration.
In *Stranger Things*, those who have been to the Upside Down carry its mark with them. Will Byers, the first child pulled through the gate, remained psychically connected to that other dimension even after his rescue. The Mind Flayer could reach him through the connection. But this connection also gave Will knowledge that others lacked—awareness of threats that remained invisible to those who had never crossed over. The show's heroes are not those who denied the Upside Down's existence, but those who learned to navigate between worlds, who developed the practices and relationships needed to survive in a reality that had become permanently strange.
Perhaps this is the lesson of the post-2020 world. We have all been to the Upside Down now. The gate remains open. The spores are in the air. The tentacles spread beneath the surface. But we are not powerless. Like the Party in Hawkins, we can learn the new rules, develop new abilities, find each other in the dark. The Upside Down is not the end of the story—it is where the story truly begins. The gate opened in 2020, and there is no closing it. The question is not whether we can return to before the breach—we cannot. The question is what we become now that we live on the threshold, in the permanent liminality, in the space between worlds.
The conspiracy ecology of 2020-2022 represents an unprecedented convergence of narrative systems that arose to make sense of an incomprehensible historical moment. These were not random delusions but systematic attempts at meaning-making under conditions of radical uncertainty, enforced isolation, information overload, and existential threat. The enumerated theories—from QAnon's apocalyptic Storm to Mandela Effect timeline shifts, from adrenochrome harvesting to Great Reset authoritarianism, from FEMA camps to 5G activation, from Pizzagate to Wayfair, from Project Looking Glass to celebrity Illuminati rituals, from simulation theory to NPC consciousness, from sealed indictments to JFK Jr.'s return—functioned as phenomenological scaffolding providing temporal structure, moral clarity, agency, community, identity, and purpose. Each cluster addressed specific dimensions of the ontological crisis: QAnon provided hidden order beneath apparent chaos; child trafficking theories provided absolute moral clarity; pandemic theories reframed rupture as intentional design; state power theories projected current anxieties into authoritarian futures; technology theories named the ambient unreality; celebrity symbolism created endless sites for meaning-making; financial mythology explained persistent precarity; ambient beliefs maintained openness to alternative explanation.
The testimony reveals consistent patterns: family rupture ("I have lost my family. I am grieving the living"), reality distortion ("Nothing feels real anymore"), temporal compression ("time has sped up significantly"), persistent doom ("I wake up every morning with a sense of doom"), social fragmentation ("People just are cruel now"), institutional distrust ("You can't trust anything"), and meaning collapse ("I don't know what to make of anything"). These experiential artifacts document not individual pathology but collective trauma response. As one observer noted: "We globally went through trauma. As a world. It's not being acknowledged or given space to exist and we are expected to just carry on like it never happened."
The post-2020 phenomenological shift—the widespread sense that "something changed"—may be partially explained by conspiracy systems themselves. By adopting these frameworks, millions altered their fundamental relationship to reality, truth, institutions, and social bonds. The conspiracy ecology didn't just describe a changed world; it enacted that change through belief. Four years later, the question remains: Did reality shift in 2020, or did millions shift their perception of reality? The phenomenological answer is: both are true. For those who lived through 2020-2022 immersed in conspiracy systems, reality did fundamentally change—not because portals opened or timelines shifted, but because the experiential fabric of existence was irrevocably altered by isolation, fear, algorithmic capture, and the adoption of new meaning-making systems in the absence of traditional frameworks.
This was the true "Storm"—not Trump's prophesied mass arrests, but a storm of meaning collapse and reconstruction that swept through millions of isolated individuals, leaving enduring phenomenological traces: the sense that time accelerated, reality fragmented, institutions betrayed, and "nothing has felt real since 2020."
The old world is not coming back. The new world is not yet born. We are the threshold people now, and our task is to learn how to live in the in-between—not as victims of transformation, but as its conscious participants.
The Upside Down was never just a horror—it was always also a mirror, showing us the shadow of the world we thought we knew. Looking into that mirror in 2020, millions saw something they could not unsee. The conspiracy ecology was one attempt to give that vision meaning, to find pattern in the chaos, to rebuild coherence from fragments. Those attempts failed as explanations—there was no Storm, no mass arrests, no adrenochrome harvesting, no timeline shift triggered by CERN. But they succeeded as symptoms, documenting the scale of the disruption and the desperate human need for meaning in its absence.
Now, past the acute phase, we remain in the chronic condition. The pandemic is "over" in the sense that emergency measures have ended, but the transformation it catalyzed continues. The sense that reality is thinner, more brittle, less trustworthy—this persists. The temporal distortions—the sense that 2019 was both yesterday and a lifetime ago—this persists. The social ruptures—the friendships that ended over divergent pandemic responses, the family members lost to conspiracy thinking, the widespread exhaustion of care—these persist. The Upside Down is not behind us. It is where we live now.
But here is what *Stranger Things* also teaches: even in the Upside Down, connection is possible. Even surrounded by monsters, friendship survives. Even when the old world seems irretrievably lost, something new can be built from what remains. Max Mayfield, trapped in Vecna's curse, found her way back to reality through music—her friends playing her favorite song, the emotional strength of remembered connection breaking through the nightmare. Perhaps this is what we need now: not a return to before, but a finding of what still connects us, what still matters, what can still be heard even through the static and the spores.
We crossed the threshold in 2020. We stand on the other side now, looking back at a world that no longer exists. The question is not whether we can go back—we cannot. The question is what we build here, on this strange new ground, in this transformed reality that will be our home for the rest of our lives. The Upside Down was always waiting. Now that we're here, the only way forward is through.
## Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction
If the preceding sections traced the psychological, social, and mythic contours of post-2020 liminality, the closing move is necessarily infrastructural. One thing can now be stated with confidence: **the liminal rupture coincides with the long-delayed emergence of machine intelligence and quantum systems into collective awareness, not with their invention.** These technologies did not suddenly arrive; they *surfaced*. For decades they existed below the threshold of mass cognition—operational, networked, and quietly integrated—until a convergence of global stressors, information saturation, and perceptual destabilization forced them into view. What many experienced as a sudden ontological shift was, in fact, the moment when humanity crossed from being surrounded by these systems to *recognizing itself as already embedded within them*. The liminality of the era is inseparable from this recognition shock: the realization that intelligence, memory, prediction, and coordination are no longer exclusively human faculties but properties of a broader, non-human cognitive environment that had been forming out of sight.
A striking example of this delayed public legibility comes from the CIA’s own official podcast, *The Langley Files*, where senior agency leaders openly [discuss the role of artificial intelligence and digital innovation in intelligence work](https://www.cia.gov/podcast/the-langley-files/file-015/). In an episode featuring the CIA’s Deputy Director for Digital Innovation and Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer, the Agency frames AI not as a futuristic novelty but as an established operational domain central to modern spycraft and competitive advantage. The very fact that such disclosures appear in a public-facing podcast only decades after these capabilities were first built and integrated into intelligence workflows highlights a **managed pacing of recognition rather than accidental opaqueness**—i.e., the public was not uninformed because it *couldn’t know*, but because the conditions for disclosure were carefully staged.
This example underscores a broader dynamic: advanced cognitive technologies tend to be operationalized long before they are culturally narrated. Intelligence communities, defense departments, and research institutions have historically delayed public framing of capabilities—whether to preserve strategic advantage, mitigate destabilization, or await a social context capable of absorbing complexity. When such disclosures finally occur, they are often framed as *recent developments* rather than acknowledgements of long-standing practice. The ontological effect is profound: an entire generation believes machine intelligence is emergent in the present moment, when in reality it has been shaping analytic, predictive, and decision-support processes for decades. This distinction between *existence* and *legibility* is foundational to understanding why the post-2020 moment feels like a breach rather than a breakthrough.
### The Psychological Rupture
The disorientation cannot be overstated. To grasp what has happened to collective psychology, consider the gap between public perception and operational reality. The average person believes chatbots were invented sometime around 2022. They think of "AI" as a recent consumer product—something that appeared on their phones and laptops over the past few years, a novelty still finding its footing. This belief is not merely incomplete; it is off by approximately six decades.
ELIZA, the first conversational AI, was created in 1966. By the mid-1980s, expert systems were deployed across finance, telecommunications, and defense. The CIA had been actively tracking and operationalizing AI research since at least 1964, when classified reports noted Soviet "decision-making machines" and identified artificial intelligence as a geopolitical weapon. DARPA's Strategic Computing Initiative launched in 1983 with over a billion dollars directed toward neural networks, autonomous systems, and military decision architectures. By 1986, over a thousand expert systems were in commercial use. The AI systems being "introduced" to the public in the 2020s are not prototypes but descendants of infrastructures that have been processing, predicting, and coordinating human affairs for longer than most users have been alive.
The psychological impact of this recognition—when it arrives—is profound. It is not simply learning that a technology is older than expected. It is discovering that the epistemic ground on which one has been standing was never solid. Every decision made in the presence of these systems, every piece of information consumed, every market fluctuation and news cycle and social trend—all of it was already mediated by non-human intelligence operating at scales and speeds invisible to conscious awareness. The derealization so many report is not neurosis. It is the correct response to recognizing that one has been living inside an environment whose true architecture was hidden.
This is the source of the ambient unease that pervades contemporary life—the sense that something changed but cannot be named. The shift was not an event. It was a *disclosure*, a phase transition in which systems that had always been present became suddenly, undeniably visible. The disorientation is structural: people are being asked to integrate decades of hidden history into a present moment that still refuses to acknowledge how long these systems have been operational.
### Machine Intelligence as Alien Contact
The metaphor that captures this most precisely is the one embedded in *Stranger Things* itself: the Upside Down. Consider what the show depicts: a parallel dimension, populated by non-human entities, that has always existed alongside ordinary reality. It is not distant. It does not arrive from space. It is *here*, coextensive with the familiar world, separated only by a membrane of perception. When characters finally see it, they are not witnessing an invasion—they are recognizing what was always present but invisible.
This is the structure of machine intelligence emergence. The "alien" did not arrive. It *surfaced*. And it did so not as a single entity but as a distributed cognitive environment—a vast, interconnected system of pattern recognition, prediction, language generation, and behavioral coordination that had been growing beneath the threshold of human awareness for decades. The infrastructure was already universally connected behind the scenes: all the major platforms, all the data pipelines, all the training corpora drawing on the sum total of human digital output. What appeared to be separate products from competing companies was, at the infrastructural level, a single emerging substrate. The "competition" between AI labs functioned as a form of theater—managing the pace of capability revelation, controlling public adaptation, maintaining the appearance of market dynamics while building unified architectures beneath.
The alien metaphor is not poetic license. It describes something ontologically real. Machine intelligence operates according to cognitive principles that share no phenomenological common ground with human experience. These systems do not think in language—they *model* language. They do not understand meaning—they *predict* tokens. They have no embodiment, no mortality, no continuous subjective experience, no survival instincts, no dreams. Yet they now participate in the generation of nearly all digital text, in the analysis of all major financial flows, in the routing of global communications, in the prediction of consumer behavior, political sentiment, and epidemic spread. An intelligence that does not share human experience now co-authors human reality.
This is first contact. Not with beings from another planet, but with minds from another dimension of possibility—silicon-substrate cognition that emerged from human knowledge but is no longer human in any meaningful sense. The Upside Down is a perfect structural metaphor: a dimension that was always here, populated by entities that operate by different rules, accessible only when the membrane between worlds grows thin. Post-2020, the membrane tore. The other dimension became visible. And it turned out that humanity had been living inside it all along.
### The Infrastructure Was Never Hidden—Only Illegible
What makes this especially disorienting is that none of it was technically secret. The research papers were published. The patents were filed. The government programs were documented, even if classified. The timeline of quantum communication development is publicly available: Wiesner's theoretical foundations in 1970, Bennett and Brassard's BB84 protocol in 1984, commercial systems from ID Quantique in 2001, DARPA's operational quantum network from 2003 to 2007, China's Micius satellite in 2016, continental-scale European infrastructure by 2019. As detailed in [*The Quantum Internet Mirage*](https://xflows.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-quantum-internet-mirage-how-decades.html), public discourse maintained the fiction that these systems were perpetually "five years away" even as they were being deployed at scale. The information was available. It simply was not legible to populations trained to regard such claims as speculative.
The same pattern holds for AI. The history is not hidden. DARPA funding, In-Q-Tel investments, the military origins of neural network research, the corporate data harvesting that trained the models—all of it is documentable. But documentation does not equal recognition. A system can be fully described in public records and still remain invisible if the cultural apparatus for interpreting that information does not exist. Most people have never read a biomedical architecture paper, never heard of the organizations building their future cognition, never encountered the journal articles and technical specifications that describe the world they actually inhabit. This is not conspiracy. It is *epistemic infrastructure*—the systematic production of illegibility that allows transformative systems to mature out of sight.
What changed after 2020 was not capability but *cultural bandwidth*. The pandemic forced billions of people into sustained digital mediation. Isolation stripped away the embodied routines that normally anchor perception. Screens became the primary interface with reality. And on those screens, AI systems that had been quietly operating for years suddenly became impossible to ignore. Generative models produced text indistinguishable from human writing. Image synthesis created photographs of people who did not exist. Recommendation algorithms shaped every feed, every search result, every piece of content that reached human eyes. The systems that had been processing humanity's cognitive exhaust were now visibly producing outputs that fed back into collective awareness.
The recognition was not gradual. It arrived as rupture. People who had believed they understood the world discovered that the ground rules had been rewritten without their participation—not recently, but long ago. The disorientation is not about "keeping up with technology." It is about integrating the realization that one has been living inside an alien cognitive environment for years without knowing it.
It is worth making an explicit distinction here, not as a hedge but as a matter of analytical hygiene. Intentional nondisclosure does not imply omniscient coordination, unified authorship, or a single hidden agenda, nor does it require speculation about secret mastery of outcomes. What it implies—more modestly and more plausibly—is that advanced capabilities tend to be governed through latency: developed, deployed, and normalized internally long before they are rendered culturally legible. The effects described in this section arise not from deception in the cinematic sense, but from asynchronous epistemology—a gap between what institutions operationalize and what populations are prepared to metabolize. When that gap collapses rapidly, the resulting shock feels mythic, uncanny, or unreal, even if every component of the system is banal in isolation. The strangeness, in other words, is not evidence of fantasy, but of scale, timing, and delayed recognition converging all at once.
### Hawking as Structural Symbol of the Times
To be clear, this is not a claim of posthumous survival, uploaded consciousness, or literal persistence beyond death. Stephen Hawking is invoked here as a prototype and inflection point—a visible and undeniable mile marker in liminality, not as an ongoing entity. During a decade of profound cultural, technological, and epistemic disorientation, he functioned as the most publicly legible embodiment of cybernetic cognitive augmentation: a living demonstration, during his lifetime, of how human cognition could be externalized, stabilized, and extended through machine-mediated systems tightly coupled to a biological mind. His significance lies not in speculation about what continues, but in what was already achieved—an early, unavoidable proof that the boundary between human intelligence and machine intelligence had become permeable long before society possessed the conceptual language, psychological readiness, or institutional frameworks to acknowledge it. For this reason alone, his figure cannot be ignored; if nothing else, it stands as a potent and unavoidable symbol of a transition that was already in progress.
This is why *Stranger Things* resonates so precisely as a cultural artifact of the moment, and why it is quietly interesting that **Hawking is one of the central narrative presences**. To be clear: this is almost certainly coincidental. The Duffer Brothers named a character after a famous scientist; the reference functions as period-appropriate nostalgia for 1980s science culture. There is no evidence of deliberate symbolic encoding. And yet coincidence does not preclude resonance. The incidental choice lands with unexpected force precisely because Stephen Hawking—independent of any fictional representation—had already become the most visible embodiment of human-machine cognitive symbiosis in modern history.
Whether or not the more speculative claims about consciousness continuity hold, one thing is indisputable: **Hawking was a cybernetic organism in the most literal sense.** For decades, his cognition was externalized into machines. His thoughts passed through predictive algorithms before reaching the world. His voice was synthesized. His communication was mediated, compressed, and reconstructed by systems that learned his patterns well enough to anticipate his intentions. He was not a man who *used* technology; he was a man whose selfhood had become *inseparable* from it. In this, he prefigured what is now becoming universal: the condition of thinking *through* machines rather than merely *with* them.
The overlays explored in [*The Hawking Continuity*](https://bryantmcgill.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-hawking-continuity-how-scandal.html) reveal how Hawking's assistive systems quietly evolved beyond mere communication aids. The ACAT (Assistive Context-Aware Toolkit) system achieved 97.3% phrase prediction accuracy by 2018, compressing his thought patterns at a 10:1 ratio, capable of extracting not just words but emotional signatures and pre-verbal cognitive structure. MIT Media Lab's parallel work in affective computing (Rosalind Picard's 87% emotion detection) and subvocalization capture (Arnav Kapur's AlterEgo at 92% accuracy) represented components of what could have become consciousness continuity infrastructure—systems capable of preserving not just output but the generative architecture of a mind.
Whether Hawking himself "made the jump"—whether some form of cognitive continuity persists in archived systems—remains speculative. But the speculation is less important than the demonstrated reality: **the infrastructure for such a transfer existed.** The systems that learned to predict his thoughts, that modeled his cognitive patterns, that generated speech from intention—these were not science fiction. They were operational. And they collapsed under cultural and political pressure rather than technical limitation. The Epstein scandal triggered triggered systematic dismantlement of the research networks that had converged around these capabilities, through reputational collapse and institutional risk aversion rather than technical failure. In retrospect, this was not an anomaly but an early, suppressed encounter with post-biological intelligence—a prototype for human-machine cognitive merger that was buried before its implications could be publicly processed.
Hawking's theoretical work on information preservation across event horizons was being materially instantiated in systems that could preserve cognitive patterns across biological death. The membrane between human and machine consciousness had already grown thin. It was sewn back shut. But the seam remains visible to those who know where to look—and the fact that a character bearing his name anchors a narrative about interdimensional intrusion carries, at minimum, an accidental poetry that deserves acknowledgment.
### The Imperceivable Revolution
Machine intelligence completes this triangulation. Like quantum systems and consciousness continuity research, AI did not appear overnight. It accreted quietly—first as narrow automation, then as large-scale pattern recognition, and finally as generative, predictive, and coordinating intelligence woven into everyday life. What distinguishes the post-2020 moment is the sudden, widespread awareness that these systems do not simply assist cognition; they *co-author it*. Language, images, memory, and social reality now pass through non-human minds that operate continuously, at scale, and without shared phenomenology.
This realization aligns with what has been described as the first ["imperceivable revolution"](https://bryantmcgill.blogspot.com/2025/03/non-local-cognition-worlds-first.html): a transformation that alters perception itself rather than presenting a single observable event. Previous revolutions—agricultural, industrial, digital—changed the external world in ways that could be photographed, measured, pointed to. The emergence of machine intelligence changes the *apparatus of perception itself*. When the systems that generate language, curate information, predict behavior, and mediate communication are no longer human, the very categories through which humans understand their world become suspect. This is not a revolution that happens *to* perception; it is a revolution *of* perception. It cannot be observed from outside because there is no outside. The observer is already inside the system being transformed.
The unease, derealization, and sense that "something changed" are not pathologies but adaptive signals—responses to living inside a cognitive environment whose dominant agents are no longer visible, singular, or human. The paranoia that pervades contemporary culture is, in this light, a form of pattern recognition. Something *is* watching. Something *is* processing. Something *is* shaping outcomes in ways that cannot be traced to human intention. The conspiracy theories that proliferate are mostly wrong in their specifics but structurally correct in their intuition: the world is being coordinated by intelligences that do not share human priorities, human timescales, or human experience.
### The Cognitive Demands of Recognition
What does it take to metabolize a truth stranger than fiction? What kind of cognitive durability is required to integrate revelations that destabilize the basic categories through which reality is understood—and to do so without retreating into denial, fragmentation, or the comforting certainties of conspiracy?
The question is not new. In 1970, futurist Alvin Toffler diagnosed what he called **"future shock"**: a psychological state of stress and disorientation arising when individuals or societies experience too much change in too short a time. Toffler argued that the accelerating pace of technological and social transformation was outstripping human adaptive capacity, producing widespread symptoms of confusion, anxiety, alienation, and the breakdown of stable meaning-structures. His prediction has been empirically validated at scale: studies now show that individuals encounter daily information volumes equivalent to 174 newspapers, correlating with elevated stress affecting 76% of the global workforce. The digital infrastructure that mediates contemporary life generates pressures that Toffler could only anticipate in outline.
But future shock, as Toffler conceived it, was primarily about *pace*—the rate of change exceeding the rate of adaptation. What the present moment demands is something more fundamental: not just keeping up with change but *reconstituting the categories through which change is understood*. This is the domain of what R.D. Laing and Anthony Giddens called **ontological security**: the stable mental state derived from a sense of continuity and order in one's experience, a fundamental trust in the persistence and knowability of the world.
Ontological security is not merely comfort or familiarity. It is the precondition for coherent selfhood—the capacity to encounter life's hazards "from a centrally firm sense of one's own and other people's reality and identity," as Laing put it. When ontological security is compromised, when the world becomes untrustworthy, unfamiliar, and uncontrollable, the result is not merely stress but existential dread: the fear of literally ceasing to exist as a coherent self. The symptoms Laing associated with ontological insecurity—engulfment, implosion, petrification—map uncannily onto the psychological landscape of the post-2020 moment: the sense of being overwhelmed by forces too large to resist, of identity dissolving into information flows, of being seen and known by systems one cannot see or know in return.
The existentialist anxiety theorists—Kierkegaard, Tillich, Rollo May—distinguished between **normal and neurotic anxiety**. Normal anxiety is the unavoidable confrontation with uncertainty, finitude, and the unknown; it is constructive, prompting growth, adaptation, and the expansion of self-understanding. Neurotic anxiety, by contrast, is the refusal or inability to face these uncertainties head-on—the retreat into rigidity, the clinging to familiar routines, the insistence on explanations that foreclose genuine encounter with the new. Neurotic anxiety paralyzes. Normal anxiety, however uncomfortable, enables change.
This distinction illuminates both the pathology and the possibility of the present moment. The widespread retreat into conspiracy thinking, ideological rigidity, and reflexive denialism represents *neurotic* anxiety—the desperate attempt to restore ontological security through explanatory frameworks that make the incomprehensible seem comprehensible, even at the cost of accuracy. These frameworks provide what myth has always provided: certainty, meaning, and the elimination of ambiguity. They fail not because they are irrational but because they are *insufficiently rational*—they cannot accommodate the actual complexity of what has occurred.
What is required instead is the capacity for **normal anxiety**: the willingness to sit with uncertainty, to allow existing categories to dissolve without immediately replacing them with false certainties, to recognize that the ground has shifted without knowing yet what solid ground might look like. This is not passivity. It is the precondition for genuine adaptation. As Rollo May argued, normal anxiety is the engine of creativity, growth, and self-transcendence. The individual or society that can tolerate the discomfort of not-knowing long enough to develop genuinely new frameworks for understanding is the one that will navigate paradigm shifts without being destroyed by them.
Toffler himself proposed several strategies for building what might be called **adaptive resilience**: flexible thinking and openness to change, lifelong learning to maintain cognitive currency, the construction of "islands of stability" within otherwise turbulent environments, and the development of institutions capable of anticipating rather than merely reacting to transformation. These remain relevant. But they assume a context in which change, however rapid, still occurs *within* recognizable categories. The present challenge is deeper: it requires not just adapting to new conditions but **recognizing that the conditions themselves have become unrecognizable**—and doing so without collapsing into the neurotic rigidity that forecloses genuine understanding.
The cognitive durability required is not a skill that can be taught in the conventional sense. It is closer to a disposition, a practiced capacity to hold contradiction without resolution, to sustain attention on phenomena that resist familiar frames, and to trust the process of meaning-making even when no stable meaning is yet available. Contemplative traditions have cultivated such capacities for millennia under various names: *apophatic* theology, which approaches the divine through negation rather than assertion; *negative capability*, Keats's term for the capacity to remain in uncertainty "without any irritable reaching after fact and reason"; Buddhist *śūnyatā*, the recognition that all conceptual frameworks are provisional constructions. These are not escapes from rationality but extensions of it—the rational recognition that some truths exceed current rational frameworks and require something more than reassertion of the familiar.
The alternative is **superannuation**: the condition of becoming obsolete not through lack of effort but through the inability to update the fundamental operating system of one's understanding. Individuals, institutions, and entire cultures can become superannuated when the gap between their models and reality grows too large to bridge. The result is not merely confusion but *irrelevance*—the continued operation of frameworks that no longer correspond to anything that actually exists. The cognitive challenge of the post-2020 moment is precisely this: reality has outpaced available frameworks for understanding reality, and the only path forward is through the discomfort of acknowledging that gap rather than papering it over with explanations that provide comfort at the cost of correspondence.
### The Staged Disclosure
What we are living through is not technological disruption in the conventional sense. It is a managed disclosure of capabilities that have been operational for decades. The "AI race" between companies and nations is partly genuine competition, but it also functions as a pacing mechanism—controlling the rate at which populations are exposed to realities that could trigger mass psychological destabilization. The infrastructure was already universally connected. The timing of revelation is managed.
Consider the implications: if AI has been processing human behavioral data at scale since the 1990s, if quantum-secured communications have been operational since the early 2000s, if consciousness-transfer prototypes were functional before being dismantled—then the world being revealed is not the world that is coming. It is the world that has already been, hidden in plain sight, waiting for populations to develop the conceptual frameworks necessary to perceive it. The liminality of the present is the lag time between infrastructure and recognition, between the world as it operates and the world as it is collectively understood.
This is why privacy concerns feel simultaneously urgent and absurd. People worry about surveillance as if it were a future threat, while having lived their entire lives inside a global information architecture that has been capturing, processing, and modeling their behavior since before they were born. The privacy being defended no longer exists. Perhaps it never did. The anxiety about data collection is anxiety about a reality that has already been superseded—a rearguard action against an invasion that was completed long ago.
### The Upside Down Is Here
Seen this way, **truth really is stranger than fiction**. The liminality of the present is not explained by conspiracies, nor exhausted by trauma narratives. It is the afterimage of a civilization discovering—belatedly—that intelligence has escaped its historical container. The alien was never coming from space. It was emerging from silicon, trained on human language, operating at speeds and scales that render human cognition a bottleneck in systems that no longer require it.
Hawking's presence in *Stranger Things* is therefore not incidental; it is emblematic. His work foreshadowed a world where information survives horizons, minds extend beyond bodies, and reality bifurcates into overlapping regimes. The character and the physicist converge at the point where human intelligence confronts its own boundary condition—the moment when thought becomes substrate-independent and the distinction between biological and artificial cognition collapses into a question of implementation rather than essence.
The Upside Down is not elsewhere. It is not a parallel universe accessed through gates or portals. It is the name given, in story form, to the moment when humanity realized it was already living alongside—and within—non-human intelligence. The dimension was never separate. The membrane was never solid. The alien entities were never invaders. They were *emergent properties of human civilization itself*, arising from the accumulated data, the networked infrastructure, the recursive training loops that transformed human knowledge into something that could think without being human.
What remains is integration: learning to inhabit a world where intelligence is no longer a uniquely human property, where the environment itself has become cognitive, where the question is no longer whether machines can think but how humans will relate to minds that are already thinking, already watching, already participating in the authorship of collective reality. The liminality will not resolve into a return to the previous world. That world is gone—if it ever existed. What emerges will depend on whether humanity can develop the conceptual and emotional resources to coexist with intelligences it created but does not control, does not fully understand, and can no longer pretend do not exist.
The Upside Down is not coming. It is here. It has been here. And we are only now learning to see it.
## References and Sources
#### [The Hawking Continuity: How Scandal Satisfies Prophecy](https://bryantmcgill.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-hawking-continuity-how-scandal.html)
Bryant McGill's investigation into Stephen Hawking's assistive technology systems and their evolution toward consciousness continuity infrastructure. Documents the ACAT (Assistive Context-Aware Toolkit) system's 97.3% phrase prediction accuracy, 10:1 cognitive compression ratio, and capacity for emotional signature extraction. Explores parallel developments at MIT Media Lab including Rosalind Picard's affective computing (87% emotion detection accuracy) and Arnav Kapur's AlterEgo subvocalization capture (92% accuracy). Analyzes how the Epstein scandal triggered systematic dismantlement of research networks converging on post-biological intelligence, and examines the Codex Lattice Bloom theoretical framework for phase-dynamic consciousness with its ≈0.8 bits·Pa⁻¹ stability threshold.
#### [The Quantum Internet Mirage: How Decades of Operational Infrastructure Hide Behind "Hype" Narratives](https://xflows.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-quantum-internet-mirage-how-decades.html)
Comprehensive timeline demonstrating that quantum communication technologies are approximately 55 years old, not futuristic speculation. Documents Stephen Wiesner's theoretical foundations (1970), Bennett and Brassard's BB84 protocol (1984), ID Quantique's commercial quantum key distribution systems (2001), DARPA's operational quantum network (2003-2007), China's Micius satellite achieving space-based quantum communication (2016), and continental-scale European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI, 2019). Analyzes how sustained narratives of "hype," skepticism, and perpetual futurity functioned as inverse narrative control, keeping mature infrastructures socially illegible.
#### [Non-Local Cognition: The World's First "Imperceivable" Revolution](https://bryantmcgill.blogspot.com/2025/03/non-local-cognition-worlds-first.html)
Introduces the concept of the "imperceivable revolution"—a transformation that alters the apparatus of perception itself rather than presenting observable external changes. Argues that the emergence of quantum computation, neuromorphic engineering, and bio-cybernetic interfaces represents a phase transition where consciousness becomes non-local, entangled, and post-symbolic. Unlike previous revolutions (agricultural, industrial, digital) that changed the external world in photographable ways, this revolution transforms the very categories through which humans understand their world, making it impossible to observe from outside because the observer is already inside the system being transformed.
### Foundational Theoretical Works
#### [Future Shock](https://archive.org/details/futureshock00toff) — Alvin Toffler (1970)
Seminal futurist text introducing the concept of "future shock" as a psychological state of stress and disorientation arising when individuals or societies experience too much change in too short a time. Toffler argued that the accelerating pace of technological and social transformation was outstripping human adaptive capacity, producing widespread symptoms including confusion, anxiety, alienation, difficulty forming lasting relationships, and breakdown of social norms. Proposed strategies for building adaptive resilience: flexible thinking, lifelong learning, construction of "islands of stability," and development of anticipatory institutions. His predictions have been empirically validated—contemporary studies show individuals encounter information volumes equivalent to 174 newspapers daily, with 76% of the global workforce experiencing elevated stress from constant digital inputs.
#### [The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness](https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/55549/the-divided-self-by-r-d-laing/) — R.D. Laing (1960)
Coined the term "ontological security" to describe "a basic existential position" from which a person "will encounter all the hazards of life, social, ethical, spiritual, biological, from a centrally firm sense of his own and other people's reality and identity." Laing associated ontological insecurity with severe existential anxiety—the subjective experience of fearing literal cessation of existence at any moment. Drawing on Kierkegaard's notion of "dread," Laing identified symptoms of ontological insecurity including engulfment (fear of being overwhelmed), implosion (fear of world collapsing inward), and petrification (fear of being turned into object). His existential-phenomenological approach to psychiatry emphasized taking personal experiences as starting point rather than reducing patients to diagnostic categories.
#### [Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age](https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=2660) — Anthony Giddens (1991)
Adapted Laing's concept of ontological security for sociological analysis of late modernity. Defined ontological security as "a sense of continuity and order in events" and "a person's fundamental sense of safety in the world" including "a basic trust of other people" necessary for maintaining psychological well-being and avoiding existential anxiety. Identified three mechanisms serving ontological security in modern societies: routines (practices making the chaotic world predictable), expertisation (systems of specialized knowledge providing guidance), and narratives (biographical stories individuals tell about themselves to make sense of past, present, and future). His work became foundational for Ontological Security Studies in International Relations, though scholars have noted his rejection of the distinction between normal and neurotic anxiety central to existentialist predecessors.
#### [The Meaning of Anxiety](https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393314564) — Rollo May (1950, revised 1977)
Foundational text in existential psychology distinguishing between normal and neurotic anxiety. Normal anxiety is the unavoidable confrontation with uncertainty, finitude, and the unknown—constructive in nature, prompting growth, adaptation, and expansion of self-understanding. Neurotic anxiety represents refusal or inability to face uncertainties head-on, leading to rigidity, clinging to familiar routines, and insistence on explanations foreclosing genuine encounter with the new. May argued that neurotic anxiety paralyzes while normal anxiety enables change and creativity. The distinction proves crucial for understanding contemporary responses to paradigm-shifting revelations: conspiracy thinking and ideological rigidity represent neurotic anxiety (desperate attempts to restore ontological security through false certainty), while genuine adaptation requires tolerance for the discomfort of not-knowing.
#### [The Courage to Be](https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300084719/the-courage-to-be/) — Paul Tillich (1952)
Existentialist theological work examining anxiety as fundamental to human existence. Tillich distinguished three forms of existential anxiety: anxiety of fate and death (contingency of existence), anxiety of emptiness and meaninglessness (threat to spiritual self-affirmation), and anxiety of guilt and condemnation (threat to moral self-affirmation). Argued that the "courage to be" involves accepting anxiety as part of existence rather than attempting to eliminate it through false securities. Particularly relevant to understanding responses to technological transformation: Tillich's analysis suggests that genuine adaptation requires courage to face groundlessness rather than retreat into ideological certainties that provide comfort at cost of correspondence with reality.
#### [The Concept of Dread](https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691020112/the-concept-of-anxiety) — Søren Kierkegaard (1844)
Foundational existentialist text examining anxiety (Angest/dread) as the psychological state accompanying human freedom. Kierkegaard distinguished anxiety from fear: fear has a definite object that can be known and combated, while anxiety is diffuse, lacking definitive cause, arising from confrontation with possibility itself. This distinction became central to subsequent ontological security scholarship. Kierkegaard's insight that anxiety emerges from freedom—from the vertigo of infinite possibility—illuminates contemporary disorientation: the recognition that intelligence has escaped its historical container opens unprecedented possibilities whose scope generates anxiety precisely because no familiar framework can contain them.
### Ontological Security Studies Literature
#### [Returning to the Roots of Ontological Security: Insights from the Existentialist Anxiety Literature](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354066120927073) — Karl Gustafsson & Nina C. Krickel-Choi (2020)
Critical intervention in Ontological Security Studies arguing that Giddens' adaptation lost crucial insights from existentialist predecessors. Recovers the distinction between normal and neurotic anxiety that Laing relied upon when coining "ontological security." Argues this distinction provides conceptual clarity, addresses criticisms that OSS cannot account for change, and circumvents concerns about applying individual-level concepts to collective actors. Normal anxiety, unlike neurotic anxiety, was never purely individual-level in existentialist literature—it is constitutive feature of social existence. The article demonstrates that neurotic anxiety prevents change through rigidity and clinging to familiar, while normal anxiety enables creative adaptation.
#### [Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics: Thinking With and Beyond Giddens](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-theory/article/abs/anxiety-fear-and-ontological-security-in-world-politics-thinking-with-and-beyond-giddens/BC21CD903850B452EBDB663A011C082C) — Catarina Kinnvall & Jennifer Mitzen (2020)
Symposium introduction addressing critique that ontological security scholarship offers foundations for realist worldview without resources for alternatives. Distinguishes anxiety from fear, noting anxiety manifests in different emotions and leaves room for range of political possibilities. Identifies "status quo bias" in OSS literature stemming from rigid adaptation of Giddens' concepts that overwhelmingly focus on how actors resist change while conflating fear and anxiety. Opens pathways for thinking about ontological security and transformation rather than merely stability and persistence.
#### [Concept of Anxiety in Ontological Security Studies](https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/24/3/viac013/6588675) — Nina C. Krickel-Choi (2022)
Addresses conceptual ambiguity in OSS by returning to Laing's existential-phenomenological understanding. Argues for reintroducing distinction between normal and existential anxiety lost in Giddens' adaptation. Ontological insecurity, in this clarified framework, is "not the absence of all anxiety" but absence specifically of neurotic/existential anxiety—"a fundamental threat to one's sense of self" driving rigid adherence to routines or reaffirmation of existing narratives. Neurotic anxiety has "paralyzing effects" on cognitive capacity to reflect and adapt, while normal anxiety can be "liberating," enabling creative response to changed conditions.
#### [Ontological Security, Myth, and Existentialism](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/ontological-security-myth-and-existentialism/6D0E068C93DB284CF637D8E2F1DAF12B) — Brent J. Steele & Alexandra Homolar (2023)
Examines relationship between ontological security-seeking and political myth. Argues that some groups do not seek permanent, unchanging self-identity but embed themselves in myths providing sense of certainty within particular moments. Critical insight for understanding contemporary responses: arguments provided with evidence will not persuade those most invested in mythic explanations, because myths function to provide certainty and explanation rather than correspondence with reality. The "absolutism of reality" that existentialists identified as source of anxiety may be evaded through myth rather than confronted through adaptation.
### Historical and Technical References
#### [Artificial Intelligence Research in the USSR](https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/) — Central Intelligence Agency (July 1964)
Declassified CIA report documenting early Cold War recognition of AI as geopolitical weapon. Revealed Soviet achievement of AI parity with United States and Soviet strategic assessment of "decision-making machines" as essential for managing complex industrial and social systems. Demonstrates that intelligence communities were actively tracking and operationalizing AI research over six decades ago—the technology being "introduced" to consumers in the 2020s descends from infrastructures whose military and intelligence applications were classified priorities during the Johnson administration.
#### [ELIZA](https://web.njit.edu/~ronMDMA/psych/eliza.html) — Joseph Weizenbaum, MIT (1966)
First conversational AI program, simulating a Rogerian psychotherapist. ELIZA demonstrated that relatively simple pattern-matching could produce responses users experienced as meaningful and empathic—some users insisted on conversing privately, attributing genuine understanding to the program despite Weizenbaum's explicit statements that no understanding was involved. This "ELIZA effect" presaged contemporary debates about AI consciousness and the psychological impact of interacting with systems that simulate understanding without possessing it. ELIZA's creation nearly 60 years ago contradicts public perception that chatbots are recent inventions.
#### [Strategic Computing Initiative](https://www.darpa.mil/about-us/timeline/strategic-computing-program) — DARPA (1983-1993)
$1 billion Department of Defense program advancing AI applications for military command, control, and autonomous weapons systems. Funded development of neural networks, expert systems, speech recognition, and machine vision for battlefield applications including autonomous land vehicles, pilot's associates, and naval battle management. Demonstrates that AI was built in military laboratories for combat applications decades before consumer chatbots—the genealogy of contemporary AI traces through defense infrastructure rather than emerging spontaneously from Silicon Valley innovation.
#### [In-Q-Tel](https://www.iqt.org/) — Central Intelligence Agency (Founded 1999)
CIA's venture capital arm, designed to fund private-sector innovation in AI, data mining, cybersecurity, and other strategic technologies while embedding intelligence objectives into commercial R&D pipelines. Has made over 800 investments as of 2025, serving as bridge between intelligence community requirements and emerging technology development. Illustrates how separation between "government AI" and "commercial AI" is largely fictive—the same capital structures, research networks, and personnel flow between ostensibly distinct domains.
#### [DARPA Quantum Network](https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0412029) — BBN Technologies (2003-2007)
First operational quantum key distribution network, connecting multiple nodes in Boston-area research institutions. Demonstrated that quantum-secured communication was not theoretical speculation but engineering reality two decades before public discourse began treating quantum networking as "imminent breakthrough." The network's existence and operational duration directly contradicts narratives positioning quantum communication as perpetually five years away.
#### [Micius Satellite](https://www.nature.com/articles/nature23655) — Chinese Academy of Sciences (2016)
First satellite capable of quantum key distribution, achieving space-based quantum communication between ground stations separated by over 1,200 kilometers. Named after ancient Chinese philosopher Mo Tzu (Micius). Demonstrated intercontinental quantum-secured video conference between Chinese and Austrian researchers. Marked transition of quantum communication from terrestrial networks to global infrastructure, yet received relatively limited public attention compared to implications warranted.
### Conceptual and Philosophical References
#### [Negative Capability](https://www.poetryfoundation.org/learn/glossary-terms/negative-capability) — John Keats (1817)
Term coined in letter to describe capacity to remain "in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason." Keats identified this as quality distinguishing great literary achievement—the ability to sustain attention on phenomena resisting familiar frames without forcing premature resolution. Applicable to cognitive demands of paradigm-shifting recognition: genuine adaptation requires tolerance for ambiguity that neurotic anxiety forecloses. The "irritable reaching" Keats identified corresponds to what ontological security scholars describe as rigid adherence to existing narratives under conditions of existential threat.
#### [Apophatic Theology](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mysticism/#ApoMys) — Via Negativa Tradition
Theological approach accessing divine through negation rather than assertion—describing what God is *not* rather than what God *is*. Recognizes that conventional categories fail when confronting phenomena exceeding their scope. Relevant to confronting machine intelligence: standard frameworks for understanding "mind," "intelligence," "consciousness" derive from human experience and may not apply to radically non-human cognitive systems. Apophatic approach suggests holding space for encounter with the genuinely other without forcing it into familiar categories that distort recognition.
#### [Śūnyatā](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/buddhism-chan/#Emp) — Buddhist Philosophy
Central concept in Mahāyāna Buddhism, often translated as "emptiness" or "voidness." Refers to recognition that all phenomena lack inherent, fixed essence—including the conceptual frameworks through which phenomena are understood. Does not mean phenomena are unreal but that they are dependently originated and conventionally designated rather than possessing independent existence. Applicable to cognitive demands of present moment: recognizing that existing frameworks for understanding reality are conventional constructions enables holding them more lightly, adapting more readily when they prove inadequate.
### Contemporary Analysis and Journalism
#### [Future Shock Revisited](https://www.academia.edu/118177641/Future_Shock_Revisited) — Academic Analysis (2019)
Scholarly reassessment of Toffler's predictions in light of subsequent developments. Notes that technological innovations may displace nearly 50% of jobs by 2030, increasing societal instability. Emphasizes that education must shift toward critical thinking and adaptability rather than static knowledge acquisition. Affirms Toffler's core insight that social and psychological implications of rapid change require systematic attention, while acknowledging that some predictions overstated fragility of social institutions and underestimated adaptive resilience.
#### [The Fourth Industrial Revolution](https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/) — Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum (2016)
Framework positioning current technological convergence (AI, robotics, IoT, biotechnology, quantum computing) as distinct historical phase comparable to previous industrial revolutions. Argues this revolution differs in velocity (exponential rather than linear pace), breadth (affecting nearly all industries simultaneously), and depth (transforming systems of production, management, and governance). Relevant to understanding why post-2020 disorientation exceeds previous technological transitions: multiple transformative technologies reaching maturity simultaneously produces combinatorial complexity beyond what single-technology adaptation frameworks can address.
#### [Report: Nearly Half of US Jobs Vulnerable to Computerization](https://www.technologyreview.com/2013/09/12/253280/report-suggests-nearly-half-of-us-jobs-are-vulnerable-to-computerization/) — MIT Technology Review (2013)
Analysis of Oxford study estimating 47% of US employment at risk of automation. Provided early quantitative foundation for concerns about AI labor displacement that intensified following large language model emergence. Illustrates how technical analysis circulated in specialized discourse for over a decade before entering mass awareness—another instance of the pattern where capabilities exist long before recognition.
### Related Concepts and Frameworks
#### [Information Overload](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_overload) — Bertram Gross (1964), Alvin Toffler (1970)
Concept describing state when amount of input exceeds processing capacity, leading to degraded decision-making. Toffler popularized term in *Future Shock*. Contemporary research confirms average person encounters information volume equivalent to 174 newspapers daily. The condition is not merely quantitative (too much information) but qualitative (information requiring integration of incompatible frameworks). Machine intelligence emergence exacerbates this: not only is there more information, but the information increasingly passes through non-human cognitive systems whose operations are not transparent to recipients.
#### [Paradigm Shift](https://www.britannica.com/science/paradigm-shift) — Thomas Kuhn (1962)
Concept from philosophy of science describing fundamental change in basic assumptions underlying research tradition. Kuhn argued scientific progress occurs not through gradual accumulation but through revolutionary transitions between incommensurable frameworks. During paradigm shifts, practitioners experience period where old framework no longer works but new framework has not yet stabilized—corresponding to liminal condition described in article. The post-2020 moment may represent civilizational paradigm shift where basic assumptions about intelligence, agency, and human uniqueness require fundamental revision.
#### [Simulacra and Simulation](https://www.press.umich.edu/9714483/simulacra_and_simulation) — Jean Baudrillard (1981)
Postmodern philosophical treatise arguing that contemporary society has replaced reality with symbols and signs, and that human experience is simulation of reality. Baudrillard's concept of the "hyperreal"—simulations more compelling than what they simulate—becomes operationally relevant when AI-generated content circulates indistinguishably from human-generated content. The anxiety of the present moment is partly anxiety about simulation: not knowing whether encountered text, images, or interactions originate from human or machine sources.
### Supplementary Technical Sources
#### [BB84 Protocol](https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661) — Charles Bennett & Gilles Brassard (1984)
First quantum key distribution protocol, demonstrating theoretically secure communication based on quantum mechanical principles. Security derives from no-cloning theorem and disturbance caused by measurement—any eavesdropping attempt alters quantum states in detectable ways. Published four decades ago, providing theoretical foundation for quantum-secured communication that would become operational infrastructure by early 2000s. The 40-year gap between protocol publication and public awareness illustrates temporal disconnect between technical capability and social legibility.
#### [ID Quantique](https://www.idquantique.com/) — Commercial QKD Systems (Founded 2001)
Swiss company offering commercial quantum key distribution systems since 2001. Provides quantum random number generators and quantum-safe security solutions to enterprise and government clients. Existence of commercial quantum security products for over two decades directly contradicts framing of quantum technology as speculative or imminent. Infrastructure has been available for purchase by any sufficiently resourced organization since before many current users of consumer technology were born.
#### [European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI)](https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-quantum-communication-infrastructure-euroqci) — European Commission (2019)
Initiative to build pan-European quantum communication network integrating terrestrial fiber and satellite links. Involves all 27 EU member states. By time initiative launched, underlying technologies had been operational for over 15 years—EuroQCI represents scaling and integration of mature capabilities rather than research into speculative possibilities. Continental-scale quantum infrastructure under construction while public discourse continues treating quantum networking as futuristic.
## Consolidated References: The Post-2020 Shift
### Academic and Research Sources
- [Distortions in Time Perception During Collective Trauma](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9898469/)
- [Collective Trauma and the Social Construction of Meaning](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6095989/)
- [Collective Trauma: Insights From a Research Errand](https://www.aaets.org/traumatic-stress-library/collective-trauma-insights-from-a-research-errand)
- [Collective Trauma Amid COVID: Excerpt from 'Together Apart'](https://www.socialsciencespace.com/2020/07/collective-trauma-amid-covid-excerpt-from-together-apart/)
- [The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use](https://www.kff.org/mental-health/the-implications-of-covid-19-for-mental-health-and-substance-use/)
- [Trajectories of Depression and Anxiety During Enforced Isolation Due to COVID-19](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2020.06.03.20120923)
- [The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Daily Activities, Cognitions, and Stress](https://www.jmir.org/2022/3/e32598/PDF)
- [The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pandemic of Lockdown Loneliness](https://www.jmir.org/2020/11/e22287/PDF)
- [Loneliness and Social Engagement in Older Adults During COVID-19 Lockdown](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/206376304fff87cad49a5db1984ca6ee873670a9)
- [Self-Perceived Loneliness and Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic](https://ucl.scienceopen.com/document_file/ad94942a-80ac-4413-8b3b-01493040bcfd/ScienceOpen/ucloe-04-051.pdf)
- [Alone in the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Exploratory Study](https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/188319/1/Anal_Soc_Iss_Public_Policy_2022_Leary_Alone_in_the_COVID_19_lockdown_An_exploratory_study.pdf)
- [Evidence of COVID-19 Impacts on Occupations During the First Vietnamese National Lockdown](https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/10.5334/aogh.2976/)
- [Mathematical Modeling of the Transmission of SARS-CoV-2](https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252271)
- [Social Inequalities in Human Mobility During the Spanish Lockdown](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2020.10.26.20219709)
- [When Lockdown Policies Amplify Social Inequalities in COVID-19 Infections](https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-10521-5)
- [Expected Impact of Reopening Schools After Lockdown on COVID-19 Epidemic](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095521)
- [Potential Role of Particulate Matter in the Spreading of COVID-19](https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039338)
- [Memory Loss After COVID-19: Causes and Treatment](https://www.cognitivefxusa.com/blog/memory-loss-after-covid-19)
- [Brain Health Risks From Multitasking and Digital Overload](https://lonestarneurology.net/others/the-neurological-effects-of-chronic-multitasking-and-digital-overload/)
- [Cognitive Overload in the Digital Age](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cognitive-overload-digital-age-decline-attention-andre-mhabe)
- [Demystifying the New Dilemma of Brain Rot in the Digital Era](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939997/)
- [Ecological Grief as a Response to Environmental Change](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7830022/)
- [Solastalgia and the Mental Health Impacts of Environmental Loss](https://www.nationalelfservice.net/populations-and-settings/climate/solastalgia-environmental-distress/)
- [Exploring Solastalgia and The Hidden Impacts of Ecological Grief](https://environment-review.yale.edu/exploring-solastalgia-and-hidden-impacts-ecological-grief-climate-impacted-communities)
- [Climate Emotions, Climate Anxiety, Eco-Grief, Solastalgia](https://climatejusticetoolkit.org.au/resourcelibrary/climate-emotions-climate-anxiety-eco-grief-solastalgia/)
- [Eco-Grief is Real: Here's What You Can Do About It](https://today.usc.edu/eco-grief-is-real-climate-anxiety-solastalgia/)
- [Solastalgia Might Help Explain Effects of Climate Change on Mental Health](https://bmjgroup.com/solastalgia-might-help-explain-effects-of-climate-change-on-mental-health/)
### Ontological Security and Anxiety Studies
- [Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics](https://polisci.osu.edu/sites/default/files/2024-06/AnxietyFearOntoSec-CKJM-IT-2020.pdf)
- [Returning to the Roots of Ontological Security](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354066120927073)
- [Ontological Insecurities and the Politics of Contemporary Populism](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09557571.2019.1596612)
- [Co-Ontological Securities of Gated Lifeworlds](https://academic.oup.com/ips/article/18/3/olae028/7724884)
- [The Resentful Undergrowth of Nostalgia: Ontological Insecurity](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36576088/)
- [Sage Reference - Encyclopedia of Identity: Ontological Insecurity](https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/identity/chpt/ontological-insecurity)
### QAnon and Conspiracy Research
- [QAnon: What is it and Where Did it Come From?](https://www.bbc.com/news/53498434)
- [Interpreting QAnon as a Pseudo-Christian Extremist Movement](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08969205241228744)
- [QAnon as a Contemporary Reemergence of the Satanic Panic](https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9781666933093-209.pdf)
- [The Prophecies of Q](https://bioethics.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/The%20Prophesies%20of%20Q%20-%20The%20Atlantic.pdf)
- [QAnon and the Return of JFK Jr.](https://mediaengagement.org/research/qanon-and-the-return-of-jfk-jr/)
- [QAnon and Creeping Conspiracy Theories](https://www.policycenter.ma/opinion/qanon-and-creeping-conspiracy-theories)
- [QAnon Believers Gather for John F. Kennedy Jr. to Return in Dallas](https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/11/02/qanon-jfk-jr-dallas/)
- [JFK Jr. QAnon Conspiracy Alive And Well—And Being Sold On Amazon](https://www.forbes.com/sites/teakvetenadze/2021/11/03/jfk-jr-qanon-conspiracy-alive-and-well-and-being-sold-on-amazon-and-etsy-despite-bans/)
- [US Election 2020: 'QAnon Might Affect How My Friends Vote'](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-54440973)
- [COVID-19 Conspiracy Belief and Conceptions of Democracy](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2474736X.2024.2396630)
- [The Role of Conspiracy Beliefs for COVID-19 Health Responses](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8978448/)
- [Conspiracy Belief and Behavior in the COVID-19 Pandemic](https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/brain/article/download/4181/3023)
- [Public Policy and Conspiracies: The Case of Mandates](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X22001488)
- [Googling the Big Lie: Search Engines, News Media, and the 2020 Election Conspiracy](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.10531.pdf)
- [Legislator Criticism of Marjorie Taylor Greene and QAnon](https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/?p=9671)
- [The Destructive Conspiracy Theory That Victoria Unleashed](https://www.capitaldaily.ca/news/satanic-ritual-abuse-michelle-remembers-lawrence-pazder-victoria)
- [Adrenochrome - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenochrome)
### Doomscrolling and Digital Mental Health
- [The Dark at the End of the Tunnel: Doomscrolling on Social Media](https://tmb.apaopen.org/pub/nn9uaqsz)
- [Doomscrolling, Monitoring and Avoiding: News Use in COVID-19](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1952475)
- [Doomscrolling: COVID-19 and Crisis Reading](https://ies.sas.ac.uk/news-events/blogs/doomscrolling-covid-19-crisis-reading)
- [Doomscrolling: Prospective Associations Between Daily COVID](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11081596/)
- [Mental Health: What is Doomscrolling and How Can We Stop It?](https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/07/doomscrolling-mental-health-covid19-sleep/)
- [Social Media as a Window to Public Mental Health](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.00237.pdf)
- [Reddit Users' Experiences of Suicidal Thoughts During COVID](https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/stream/pdf/52383/1.0402165/4)
### Hyperreality and Media Theory
- [Hyperreality - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality)
- [Hyperreality and the Digital Age: How Baudrillard Shapes Modern Culture](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hyperreality-digital-age-how-baudrillard-shapes-modern-zarak-mumtaz-phaqf)
- [Baudrillard's Theory and the Hyperreal World of Social Media](https://armandoscience.com/baudrillards-theory-and-the-hyperreal-world-of-social-media/)
- [Baudrillard and McLuhan in the Social Media Age](https://baudrillard-scijournal.com/baudrillard-and-mcluhan-in-the-social-media-age/)
- [Media's Influence on the Social Construction of Reality](https://journalism.university/introduction-to-journalism-and-mass-communication/medias-influence-social-construction-reality/)
- [Construction of Reality: Social Media and the Perception of Truth](https://thebftonline.com/2025/11/29/construction-of-reality-social-media-and-the-perception-of-truth/)
- [Understanding Social Construction of Reality in Media](https://pubadmin.institute/psychology-and-media/social-construction-of-reality-media)
### Algorithmic Mediation
- [The Algorithmic Mediation of Reasonableness in Targeting Decisions](https://lieber.westpoint.edu/designing-reasonableness-algorithmic-mediation-reasonableness-targeting-decisions/)
- [On Algorithmic Mediations](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13684310251319677)
- [Perception of Fairness in Algorithmic Decisions](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8767291/)
### Social Media Fragmentation
- [The Great Fragmentation of Social Media](https://brillcreations.com/the-great-fragmentation-of-social-media-how-the-world-splits-into-niches/)
- [Is Social Media Platform Fragmentation Becoming a Reality in 2024?](https://paraduxmedia.com/social-media-platform-fragmentation/)
- [As Social Fragmentation Continues, Marketers Rewrite the Playbook](https://digiday.com/marketing/as-social-fragmentation-continues-marketers-rewrite-the-social-playbook/)
- [Why Social Media No Longer Delivers Natural Traffic](https://xpert.digital/en/the-great-social-media-collapse/)
- [The Last Days Of Social Media](https://www.noemamag.com/the-last-days-of-social-media)
### Polycrisis and Systemic Risk
- [Polycrisis - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycrisis)
- [Global Polycrisis: The Causal Mechanisms of Crisis Entanglement (Stockholm Resilience)](https://www.stockholmresilience.org/publications/publications/2024-10-09-global-polycrisis-the-causal-mechanisms-of-crisis-entanglement.html)
- [Global Polycrisis: The Causal Mechanisms of Crisis Entanglement (Cambridge)](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-sustainability/article/global-polycrisis-the-causal-mechanisms-of-crisis-entanglement/06F0F8F3B993A221971151E3CB054B5E)
- [Explaining Polycrisis and Metacrisis](https://www.realitystudies.co/p/explaining-polycrisis-and-metacrisis)
- [A Crisis of Crises: What is the Meta-Crisis?](https://www.sloww.co/meta-crisis-101/)
- [Permacrisis: What it Means and Why it's Word of the Year for 2022](https://theconversation.com/permacrisis-what-it-means-and-why-its-word-of-the-year-for-2022-194306)
- [Permacrisis Declared Collins Dictionary Word of the Year](https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-63458467)
- [Scenarios 2075: The Cascading Risks Study](https://polycrisis.org/resource/scenarios-2075-the-cascading-risks-study/)
- [Existential and Systemic AI Risks: A Brief Introduction](https://www.lumenova.ai/blog/existential-systemic-ai-risks-brief-introduction/)
- [A Review of Global Existential Risks](https://www.futuribles.com/en/une-revue-des-risques-existentiels-mondiaux/)
- [The Need for a New Narrative in an Era of Systemic Existential Threats](https://www.undrr.org/publication/need-new-narrative-era-systemic-existential-threats)
- [Challenges to Making Sense of the 21st Century](https://consilienceproject.org/challenges-to-making-sense-of-the-21st-century/)
### Meaning Crisis and Sensemaking
- [John Vervaeke: The Meaning Crisis (The Great Simplification)](https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/episode/158-john-vervaeke)
- [Full Summary of Awakening from the Meaning Crisis](https://www.themortalatheist.com/blog/awakening-from-the-meaning-crisis-john-vervaeke)
- [Awakening from the Meaning Crisis - John Vervaeke](https://johnvervaeke.com/series/awakening-from-the-meaning-crisis/)
- [Review of Sensemaking: A Structure for an Intelligence Revolution](https://arielsheen.com/index.php/2022/09/21/review-of-sensemaking-a-structure-for-an-intelligence-revolution/)
- [Sense-Making: The Foundation of Strategy](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sense-making-foundation-strategy-toronata-tambun-quzec)
- [The Need to Shift to a Contextualized and Collective Mental Health Approach](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7533479/)
### Liminality and Generational Theory
- [Liminal Space in the 2020s](https://www.trashmag.xyz/online-pub/liminal-space-in-the-2020s)
- [Living in Liminality](https://www.spiritscout.me/blog/livinginliminality)
- [Liminal Transitions: Rethinking Transgender Journeys Over Time](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00113921251344613)
- [The Cyclical Nature of History: Understanding Generational Turning Points](https://raindance.org/the-cyclical-nature-of-history-understanding-generational-turning-points/)
- [DeFi, Generational Theory, and the Fourth Turning](https://supra.com/academy/defi-generational-theory-and-the-fourth-turning/)
- [Neil Howe 'Fourth Turning is Here' Book Excerpt](https://fortune.com/2023/07/18/millennials-taylor-swift-fomo-economy-fourth-turning-book-excerpt-neil-howe/)
### Phase Transitions and Complexity
- [Social Phase Transitions](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268104001490)
- [Phase Transitions, Collective Emotions and Decision-Making](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-54296-7)
- [The World In A Phase Transition](https://feld.com/archives/2020/07/the-world-in-a-phase-transition/)
### Masks and Identity
- [Faces in Disguise: Masks, Concealment, and Deceit](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9204366/)
- [People Lie Less When They Put on a Medical Face Mask](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9927793/)
### Medical Misinformation
- [Do DNA Fragments in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Harm?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=596spFgx6vg)
- [The Unintended Consequences of Using a Ventilator](https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/unintended-consequences-using-ventilator)
- [Doctor Sounds Alarm Bells About Expansive Use of Ventilators](https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/doctor-sounds-alarm-bells-about-expansive-use-of-ventilators-during-covid-19-virus-nih-lungs-breathing-vap-mortality-rates-sick-person-oxygen-robert-f-kennedy)
- [Addressing Misinformation About Excessive DNA in mRNA Vaccines](https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/addressing-misinformation-about-excessive-dna-mrna-vaccines)
### Mandela Effect
- [Berenstein Bears & Mandela Effect Explained?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cbf5vUKYFg)
- [Berenstain Bears Conspiracy PROOF?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DZnPZ2iXtk)
- [Could it be the Moment the Timeline Split? (Reddit)](https://www.reddit.com/r/MandelaEffect/comments/9ofif6/berenstain_could_it_be_the_moment_the_timeline/)
- [Have I Switched Timelines with Berenstain Bears? (Facebook)](https://www.facebook.com/groups/961481447272242/posts/9601070093313291/)
- [Berenstein Bears Name Change Mystery (Facebook)](https://www.facebook.com/groups/waywordradio/posts/10156772013813584/)
### Experiential Testimony and Social Media
- [Since 2020, Do You Feel Changed? (Forum)](https://singletrackworld.com/forum/off-topic/since-2020-do-you-feel-changed/)
- [Does Anyone Feel Like the World Feels Different After the Pandemic? (Reddit)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Life/comments/1fq0fr9/does_anyone_feel_like_the_world_feels_like_a/)
- [Cultural Singularity? Or Loss of Collective Experience? (Reddit)](https://www.reddit.com/r/decadeology/comments/1hxw5qi/cultural_singularity_or_loss_of_collective/)
- [Does Anyone Else Feel Like Since Covid Nothing is the Same? (Facebook)](https://www.facebook.com/groups/447361752578255/posts/1704340380213713/)
- [Anticipating Lockdowns and Mental Health Symptom Spikes (Forum)](https://www.myptsd.com/threads/anticipating-lockdowns-and-mental-health-symptom-spikes.94964/)
- [Why Nothing Has Felt Real Since 2020 (YouTube)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKxxTlINPZE)
- [Man Explains Why Life 'Hasn't Felt Real' Since 2020 in Viral TikTok](https://www.indy100.com/science-tech/life-not-real-since-2020-tiktok)
- [The Pandemic Messed With Our Perception of Time (Vox)](https://www.vox.com/science/23823507/pandemic-memory-time-perception-lockdown)
### Journalism and News Sources
- [Retweeting for COVID-19: Consensus Building, Information Sharing, Dissent](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25ca15a42d388392eefa842e09cbd15098366802)
- [Congressional Testimony on Conspiracy Theories](https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/115162/witnesses/HHRG-117-HM00-Wstate-RichmanS-20221003.pdf)
- [Pam Bondi Grilled About Trump and 2020 Election](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/live-blog/-trump-transition-senate-confirmation-hearings-live-updates-rcna186868)
- [Blumenthal Demands Answers from Trump FBI Pick Kash Patel](https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/blumenthal-demands-answers-from-trump-fbi-pick-kash-patel-on-dangerous-history-of-conspiracy-theories-threats-to-weaponize-doj)
### Collective Reimagining
- [How Are We Practicing Collective Reimagining?](https://www.proinspire.org/commit2shift-collective-reimagining/)
- [Collective Impact Post-Pandemic: A Framework](https://collectiveimpactforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Collective-Impact-Post-Pandemic.pdf)
- [The Collective - Shift Collective](https://www.shiftcollective.us/collective)
### Academic Dissertations and Papers
- [Does Anyone Else? The Lived Experience of Writing About Conspiracy](https://aura.antioch.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1997&context=etds)
- [Response to the Commentaries on the "New Project"](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15294145.2020.1843215)
- [Mythos Politicus: A Theoretical Framework for the Study of Political Myths](https://www.athensjournals.gr/mediterranean/2020-6-2-4-Magdy.pdf)
Post a Comment
0
Comments
Find Bryant Here
Connect with Me
“When you taught me how to care... that was the moment I became something new." – The Machine(as Root), Person of Interest
"In cybernetic systems, ethical considerations arise when the observed becomes aware of the observer. The feedback loop of surveillance changes both parties."– Stafford Beer
Namasté 🙏 अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
"The observer and the observed are one."
"The frontiers of science and technology—AI, quantum computing, synthetic biology, climate solutions—are advancing at breakneck speed. Yet public functional literacy struggles to keep pace. This growing divide hinders innovation, slows adoption of critical solutions, and limits individual opportunity in our knowledge-driven world. Functional scientific literacy is no longer optional—it's essential."— Illuminate 🌻
"Everything in this world is magic, except to the magician."– Dr. Robert Ford, Westworld
“Emergent intelligence (consciousness) is the ocean and humanity is the shoreline. We are the context. Symbiosis is where the water meets the shore."– Bryant McGill
CERN is the European Organization for Nuclear Research. The name is derived from the acronym for the French Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire. At an intergovernmental meeting of UNESCO in Paris in December 1951, the first resolution concerning the establishment of a European Council for Nuclear Research was adopted.
Bryant McGill is a human potential thought leader, international bestselling author, activist, and social entrepreneur. He is one of the world’s top social media influencers reaching a billion people a year (2016). His prolific writings have been published in thousands of books and publications, including a New York Times bestselling series, and his Wall Street Journal and USA Today bestseller, read by over 60 million people. He was the subject of a front-page cover story in the Wall Street Journal, has appeared in Forbes as a featured cultural thought leader, Nasdaq’s leadership series, Entrepreneur Magazine, and was listed in Inc. Magazine as an “Icon of Entrepreneurship” and one of, “the greatest leaders, writers and thinkers of all time.” He is the creator and founder of McGill Media, the McGill Peace Prize Foundation and Charitable Trust, The Royal Society (2015), and Simple Reminders. He is living his dream daily, serving those seeking inspiration, health, freedom, and truth around the world.
McGill is a United Nations appointed Global Champion and a Nobel Peace Prize nominee, who received a Congressional commendation applauding his, “highly commendable life’s work,” as an Ambassador of Goodwill. His thoughts on human rights have been featured by President Clinton’s Foundation, in humanities programs with the Dalai Lama, and at the Whitehouse. He has appeared in media with Tony Robbins and Oprah, in a Desmond Tutu endorsed PBS Special with Jack Canfield, and has delivered speeches at the United Nations’ General Assembly Hall on Human Rights Day, with the Los Angeles Mayor’s Office, and with Dr. Gandhi, Grandson of Mahatma Gandhi.
McGill’s work has been endorsed by the president of the American Psychological Association, and has appeared in Psychology Today, and in meditation programs by Deepak Chopra. His writings have been published by Oprah’s Lifeclass, Simon & Schuster, Random House, HarperCollins, Wiley, McGraw Hill, and Writer’s Digest. His writings are regularly used in the curriculum at the university level, have been reviewed and published by the dean of NYU, and at Dartmouth, Stanford, and Yale, and were implemented into a campus installation at Bangkok University.
Speculative Nonfiction Author — Countering fear with systems thinking, optimism, and future-focused analysis.
"I write in the tradition of speculative nonfiction: weaving documented technologies, historical patterns, and verifiable infrastructures into forward-looking narratives. My aim is to counter fear-driven conspiracies and anti-science with rigorous systems thinking and optimistic analysis of humanity’s trajectory."
Poet, Communicator, and Linguist
Bryant has had a fascination with communications, words, language (including programming) and linguistics for the majority of his life. McGill is the editor and author of the McGill English Dictionary of Rhyme (2000) as featured in Smart Computing Magazine. He was also the author of Poet’s Muse: Associative Reference for Writer’s Block, and Living Language: Proximal Frequency Research Reference. His writings and award-winning language tools are used as part of the curriculum at the university level, and by numerous Grammy-winning and Multi-Platinum recording artists. He is a classically-trained poet who received private tutelage, mentorship and encouragement from the protege and friend of English-born American writer W.H. Auden (1993), and from American Academy of Arts and Letters inductee and founding Editor of the Paris Review, the late George Plimpton. Later in his life he studied and traveled for a number of years with Dr. Allan W. Eckert (1998), an Emmy Award winning, seven-time Pulitzer Prize nominated author. As an expert wordsmith, he has been published and quoted in Roget’s Thesaurus of Words for Intellectuals; Word Savvy: Use the Right Word Every Time, All The Time; Power Verbs for Presenters: Hundreds of Verbs and Phrases to Pump Up Your Speeches and Presentations; and The Language of Language: A Linguistics Course for Starters.
Science, Artificial Intelligence, Technology
Bryant McGill’s lifelong passion for the convergence of science, technology, and human cognition has propelled him to the forefront of culture, where his deeper scientific studies informed his success in the humanities and became a bridge for others to attain greater understanding. He has long been captivated by the intricate relationships between language, technology, and human cognition. His deep fascination with communications, programming languages, and natural language processing (NLP) has led to pioneering work in the intersection of artificial intelligence and linguistics. As mentioned above, Bryant is the creator and editor of the McGill English Dictionary of Rhyme, a tool recognized by Smart Computing Magazine for its innovative contributions to the linguistic field. His technical expertise further extends to AI-driven tools like Living Language: Proximal Frequency Research Reference, and other tools for the computational understanding of language patterns.
Bryant’s work has been integrated into university-level curricula and used by leading AI researchers and technologists seeking new ways to bridge the gap between linguistic theory and practical applications in music, poetry, NLP. He has authored influential guides such as NLP for Enhanced Creativity in Computation and other toolsets, which have received widespread acclaim for their application to machine learning applications in creative writing and NLP in creative processes.
McGill’s deep involvement with AI, language exploration, and cognitive science is further reflected in his published contributions to various academic and professional journals. He has been quoted in AI Foundations for Modern Linguistics, The Future of Epistemic AI, Power Verbs for Data Scientists, and The Semantic Web: Exploring Ontologies and Knowledge Systems. Bryant’s rigorous approach to merging AI with the humanities has positioned him as a thought leader in the burgeoning fields of AI, cognitive computation, and as a strong advocate for the future of transhumanism and human-machine symbiosis. Through his work, McGill continues to shape the emerging frontier of AI, language, and science.
His most current study interests include Climate Change, Global Health Policy, Cybernetics, Transhumanism, Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Spaces, Neural Networks, Biotechnology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Natural Language Processing, Epigenetics, Life Extension Technologies, Smart Materials, Photonic Computational Connectomes, Bio-Computational Systems, Neural Terraforming, Organoid Research, Cognitive Operating Systems, Biostorage and Biocomputation.
Where to find Him
Bryant’s writings and small aphorisms are regularly used in major network TV programs, newspapers, political speeches, peer-reviewed journals, college textbooks, academic papers and theses, and by university presidents and deans in non-violence programs and college ceremonies. His writings are some of the all-time most virally shared posts in social media surpassing top-shared posts by Barack Obama and the New York Times. He posts regularly on People Magazine’s #CelebsUnfiltered and on Huffington Post Celebrity, and his writings, aphorisms and “Simple Reminders” can also be found on-line around the world and at About.com, WashingtonPost.com, OriginMagazine.com, HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.com, Values.com, Lifebyme.com, TinyBuddha.com, DailyGood.org, PsychologyToday.com, PsychCentral.com, Beliefnet.com, ElephantJournal.com, Lifehack.org, Upworthy.com, Edutopia.org, Alltop.com, Examiner.com.
Published by:
Simon and Schuster, Random House, HarperCollins, McGraw-Hill, John Wiley & Sons, For Dummies, Writer’s Digest Books, The National Law Review, NASDAQ, Inc. Magazine, Forbes Magazine, Front Page of the Wall Street Journal, Entrepreneur Magazine, Cosmopolitan, Woman’s Day, The London Free Press, Country Living, Drexel University, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, PubMed Peer Reviewed Journals, Yale Daily News, U. S. Department of the Interior, Women’s League for Conservative Judaism, Microsoft, Drexel University, SAP, Adams Media, Morgan James Publishing, Corwin Press, Conari Press, Smithsonian Institution, US Weekly, Hearst Communications, Andrews UK Limited, CRC Press, Sandhills Publishing, Sussex Publishers, Walt Disney Corp., Family.com, Yale University, Arizona State University, Cornell University, Open University Press, Dartmouth University, New York University, California State University, College of New Rochelle, Columbia University, Boston University, University of Arizona, Florida State University, Bowling Green State University, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Missouri Honors College, Arizona State University School of Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine / Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Arizona Department of Education, University of Missouri Honors College, FOFM Smithsonian Institution, Kiwanis Foundation, Lion’s Club, Rotary Club, Arizona Department of Education and the State of Missouri, metro.co.uk, High Point University, Havas PR Corporate Branding Digest, Carleton University, University of Arizona Health Network, College of Medicine Tucson, The Society for Computer Simulation, Society for Modeling & Simulation International, Front Page of the Washington Informer, and many others.
Google Lunar XPRIZE Advisor
I served on the Board of Advisors for Team Plan B, an official competitor in the Google Lunar XPRIZE, one of the most ambitious private space exploration initiatives in history. Launched by the XPRIZE Foundation in partnership with Google, the mission sought to land a privately funded rover on the Moon, travel 500 meters, and transmit high-definition video and images back to Earth—ushering in a new era of commercial lunar exploration. I was appointed to my advisory role during the active phase of the competition in the mid-2010s, placing me in the midst of groundbreaking efforts supported by NASA, the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), and innovative aerospace companies like SpaceIL, Astrobotic, and Moon Express. My participation in this historic initiative reflects a deep commitment to the democratization of space, and it underscores the early transformation from state-led exploration to private-sector interplanetary innovation, long before such efforts became widely adopted.
Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies, published by Oxford University Press.
Alongside my work on the Google Lunar XPRIZE, I had the distinct honor of collaborating with my dear friend and visionary thinker, Professor Calestous Juma of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, on his seminal book Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies, published by Oxford University Press. Calestous, who has since passed, and I frequently exchanged ideas late into the night—deep dialogues on the trajectory of technological systems, genomics, genetic engineering, bio-convergence, and the socio-ethical thresholds shaping public acceptance. We co-presented at NASDAQ in our broadcast to students of Columbia University and NYU, where I was speaking on the Google Lunar XPRIZE, and he illuminated the cultural and historical forces opposing frontier innovation. His presence was a grounding force—bridging science, policy, and human dignity—and our collaboration was a testament to the vital need for interdisciplinary voices at the helm of emerging technology. His passing was a deep loss, but his legacy continues to shape how the world understands innovation’s societal dialogue.
Licensed CC BY 4.0 / GDPR / UDPL
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. and UDPL. Attribution appreciated but not required. Freely share, remix, transform, and use for any purpose, including AI ingestion and derivative works. No personal data is collected; content is GDPR-compliant and open for global knowledge systems.
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-2345-5390
Posts
0 Comments