Trump Orders Capture of Venezuela’s Maduro, Signaling the New Rules-Based Order

Bryant McGill · Trump Orders Capture of Venezuela’s Maduro, Signaling the New Rules-Based Order

**Links**: [Blogger](https://bryantmcgill.blogspot.com/2026/01/new-rules-based-order.html) | [Substack](https://bryantmcgill.substack.com/p/trump-orders-capture-of-venezuelas) | Medium | Wordpress | [Soundcloud 🎧](https://soundcloud.com/bryantmcgill/trump-orders-capture-of-venezuelas-maduro-signaling-the-new-rules-based-order) *On January 3, 2026, the United States captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in a unilateral military operation, signaling an emerging rules-based order where rogue regimes are reclassified as criminal-terror nodes subject to direct interdiction, disrupting proxy networks, resource flows, and brokerage roles while testing contested boundaries in a networked-threat era.* President Donald Trump announced from Mar-a-Lago that United States forces had executed a large-scale military operation in Venezuela resulting in the capture and extraterritorial removal of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, with both individuals flown out of the country and taken into U.S. custody. Major news organizations including Reuters, the Associated Press, and the Washington Post confirmed the basic operational parameters—aircraft deployment, strike components, leadership seizure—while immediately flagging the extraordinary nature of a cross-border decapitation operation targeting a sitting head of state. The announcement itself carries the signature of **unilateral executive action** bypassing traditional congressional authorization frameworks, positioning the operation not as regime change through indigenous uprising or coalition warfare but as **direct sovereign interdiction** under what appears to be an emergent counterterror-counternarcotics hybrid doctrine. Under Secretary of State Jacob S. Helberg framed the action in civilizational terms, declaring that "the globalist establishment preached appeasement while a narco-terrorist turned Venezuela into a criminal outpost" and that "the era of weakness is over," language that explicitly rejects diplomatic incrementalism in favor of **coercive resolution** as first-order policy. This is not rhetorical decoration; it signals a **reclassification logic** where certain regimes are no longer engaged as sovereign peers within the Westphalian system but as **transnational criminal-terror nodes** subject to law enforcement protocols that supersede territorial immunity. The justification architecture rests on three interlocking pillars: the **narco-terrorist state thesis** positioning Venezuela as a criminalized government apparatus rather than a legitimate polity, the **hemispheric security imperative** treating Caracas as an Iranian proxy foothold threatening regional stability, and the **democratic legitimacy transfer** to Maria Corina Machado, who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize and has consistently argued that military force represents the only viable liberation pathway after twelve years of consolidated autocratic control. Machado's Nobel credential is not incidental—it functions as an **external legitimacy anchor** that allows the operation to be framed as pro-democratic intervention rather than pure power projection, even as her own statements acknowledging force-necessity preemptively neutralize criticism that peaceful alternatives remained unexplored. The Venezuelan opposition leader's global recognition creates a **focal-point mechanism** for transition governance, meaning international actors who might condemn the method can still coordinate around the outcome by channeling support through an internationally validated figure rather than through ad hoc military administration. This is strategic architecture, not moral theater: the operation generates immediate sovereignty backlash from states invested in territorial inviolability norms, but it simultaneously offers those same states a **legitimacy off-ramp** through Machado's democratic credentials, allowing them to condemn process while endorsing transition trajectory. The **network interdiction effects** radiate outward through multiple overlapping systems, beginning with the Caracas–Tehran axis that has functioned as Iran's primary Western Hemisphere facilitation node for sanctions evasion, financial obfuscation, and operational logistics. Policy literature extensively documents Venezuela's role as a permissive environment for Iranian-aligned networks, including Hezbollah's Latin American criminal-terror convergence operations spanning the Tri-Border Area and broader regional finance and documentation infrastructure. When a regime providing **sovereignty cover** for these networks experiences sudden leadership decapitation, the immediate consequence is not operational collapse but **trust-cost inflation** across the entire facilitation ecosystem—every prior arrangement, safehouse, documentation chain, and financial conduit must now be repriced for exposure risk because the protective state apparatus guaranteeing those transactions has been demonstrated as penetrable rather than sovereign. Hezbollah's Latin American footprint relies on stable corruption rather than chaotic vacancy; the Maduro removal doesn't eliminate the infrastructure, but it **raises the maintenance cost** of every node previously operating under Venezuelan governmental indifference or active protection. This is classic network disruption theory: you don't need to physically destroy every edge in a graph if you can sufficiently increase the **friction coefficient** across enough critical pathways that alternative routing becomes economically prohibitive. The hydrocarbon dimension operates on a different but parallel axis, where Trump's explicit statement about temporarily "running" Venezuela and involving U.S. oil companies directly connects the military operation to **resource-flow reorientation**. Venezuela possesses the world's largest proven crude reserves, and under Maduro those reserves increasingly flowed toward Chinese refineries as part of debt-for-oil arrangements that provided Beijing with discounted access while insulating Caracas from Western financial pressure. The strategic logic here is not about U.S. energy needs—North American production has eliminated import dependency—but about **denial operations** in great-power competition: every barrel that moves from China-bound tankers to Western markets is a marginal degradation of Beijing's energy security diversification and a corresponding inflation of its geopolitical risk premium. This is the economic complement to military interdiction: if the operation successfully redirects Venezuelan production toward U.S. and allied refineries, it doesn't just remove a revenue stream from an adversarial regime but actively **reprices Chinese energy optionality** by eliminating a major non-Middle Eastern supply alternative. The oil conversation is therefore not about Trump enriching American companies but about reconfiguring the **strategic petroleum architecture** in ways that compound pressure on Beijing's resource-access calculus across multiple theaters simultaneously. Qatar's response reveals a third-order effect that illuminates the **brokerage-value destruction** inherent in unilateral action. Doha has cultivated a carefully constructed identity as the indispensable intermediary between Washington and regimes like Caracas, positioning itself as the unique channel through which dialogue, negotiation, and eventual resolution must flow. This mediation brand generates geopolitical leverage disproportionate to Qatar's territorial size or military capacity—the more essential the intermediary appears, the more both parties must invest in maintaining that relationship to preserve access to the negotiation infrastructure. Trump's decision to bypass any mediation framework and execute direct seizure operations **collapses the value function** of Qatari brokerage by demonstrating that the United States neither requires nor desires third-party facilitation when it possesses the operational capacity and political will to impose outcomes directly. Qatar's immediate expression of "deep concern" and calls for dialogue are not humanitarian sentiment but **brand-defense signaling**: Doha must publicly advocate for the diplomatic processes that justify its intermediary role, even as the successful unilateral operation empirically demonstrates that such processes are optional rather than necessary. The strategic insight is that Qatar's leverage is **convex in perceived indispensability**—small reductions in how essential mediation appears produce disproportionately large reductions in geopolitical influence—and the Caracas operation represents a massive, visible demonstration that the U.S. executive branch treats Doha's services as dispensable luxuries rather than structural requirements. The **contagion signaling** toward Iran operates through expectation-alteration rather than direct commitment. Reuters and Guardian reporting describe widespread Iranian unrest driven by economic collapse, hyperinflation, and intensifying repression, creating a context where opposition movements must constantly recalculate regime-durability estimates and potential external-support probabilities. The Caracas operation does not constitute a formal pledge of U.S. assistance to Iranian protesters, but it dramatically updates their Bayesian priors about American **willingness to execute high-cost coercive operations** against regimes previously considered untouchable due to sovereignty norms or escalation risks. This is signaling under uncertainty: when the United States demonstrates capacity and resolve to physically remove a head of state from another country, it shifts the entire **credibility distribution** for future threats and promises, making both regime and opposition recalculate their strategic gambles. For Tehran's leadership, the question becomes whether their own survival guarantees remain robust if Washington has revealed willingness to treat sovereignty as conditionally revocable rather than absolute; for Iranian opposition movements, the question becomes whether sustained resistance might now attract meaningful external support where previously only rhetorical encouragement seemed available. Neither calculation requires explicit U.S. statements—the **demonstrated preference** embedded in the Caracas action contains sufficient information to alter incentive structures across every analogous context. The **norm-fracture dimension** requires careful epistemic management because it represents the most contested analytical terrain. What is empirically observable is that multiple states and international institutions immediately condemned the operation as a sovereignty violation, invoking territorial integrity principles and questioning legal authorization frameworks—these responses are not partisan opposition but structurally predictable reactions from actors invested in Westphalian norms as stability mechanisms. Simultaneously observable is the U.S. executive branch's assertion of a **reclassification doctrine** treating certain regimes as transnational criminal enterprises subject to law enforcement rather than diplomatic protocols, effectively claiming that narco-terror designation strips sovereignty protection in the same way piracy historically created universal jurisdiction exceptions. These are not reconcilable positions; they represent a **fundamental ontological disagreement** about whether sovereignty remains an inherent attribute of territorial control or becomes a conditional privilege contingent on regime behavior as defined by dominant powers. The proper analytical frame is not to adjudicate which interpretation is "correct" but to recognize that both claims are being actively asserted, creating a **stress-test environment** where established international law confronts operational reality and the outcome will be determined by which precedent accumulates sufficient state practice to crystallize as emergent custom. This is how legal orders actually evolve: not through conference-room consensus but through **high-stakes precedent collisions** where power demonstrates new capabilities and norms either adapt or fracture. The transition architecture positions Machado's Nobel-backed legitimacy as the **coordination mechanism** through which international actors can support Venezuelan stabilization without explicitly endorsing the intervention method. Her global recognition allows states to maintain opposition to unilateral force while simultaneously channeling reconstruction assistance, electoral observation, and diplomatic recognition toward a figure whose democratic credentials are independently verified by the Nobel Committee rather than imposed by Washington. This is **mechanism design** for contested transitions: the operation creates a legitimacy vacuum that Machado can fill precisely because her authority derives from international institutional validation rather than U.S. military imposition, allowing even critical states to pragmatically engage with post-Maduro governance while preserving their juridical objections to how the vacancy was created. The strategic elegance lies in **separating process from outcome**—states can condemn the sovereignty violation while supporting the democratic transition, treating these as orthogonal rather than coupled variables. Whether this architecture successfully stabilizes Venezuela or instead produces prolonged contested governance depends on factors not yet observable, but the structural logic is coherent: create a focal point with independent legitimacy, then let coordination dynamics around that focal point proceed separately from debates about intervention legality. What emerges from this multi-dimensional analysis is not a simple story of American strength versus authoritarian weakness but rather a **complex adaptive response** to network-based threats that traditional sovereignty frameworks struggle to address effectively. When criminal enterprises acquire state apparatus, when terror networks embed within governmental protection, when great-power competition operates through proxy resource flows, the classical distinction between domestic jurisdiction and international relations becomes **ontologically unstable**—the threat is simultaneously criminal, military, and geopolitical, residing in no single legal category cleanly. The Caracas operation represents an **experimental solution** to this categorical instability: treat the regime as a network node rather than a sovereign peer, apply interdiction rather than negotiation, and manage legitimacy transfer through independently validated democratic figures rather than through imposed transitional councils. Whether this approach becomes a **durable template** or a singular exception depends entirely on how subsequent events unfold—the strategic effects on Iranian networks, Chinese energy security, Qatari brokerage value, and Venezuelan democratic consolidation will empirically test the model's viability across multiple threat theaters simultaneously. The piece is not advocacy for or against the operation but rather **analytical mapping** of the causal architecture it instantiates, recognizing that civilizational transitions often emerge not from consensus frameworks but from **high-variance experiments** that either crystallize into new norms or collapse into cautionary precedents, with the outcome determined by operational results rather than juridical arguments.

## Postscript: The Alliance in Plain Sight It is no longer useful—or honest—to describe what is unfolding in Venezuela, Gaza, and across the financial–logistical corridors running through Doha as episodic coordination or ad hoc alignment. The **United States** and **Israel** operate not merely as allies in the classical, treaty-bound sense, but as a **single, co-evolved defensive metabolism**, distributed across two sovereign platforms to maximize resilience, learning velocity, and survivability under pressure. Israel functions at the forward edge—high-risk intelligence collection, rapid operational experimentation, real-time adversarial learning—while the United States supplies depth: industrial scale, global logistics, financial reach, and macro-deterrence. Separate flags and electorates; a shared operating system designed to preserve continuity when the system is stressed. Owning this reality predictably provokes backlash. What supporters describe as integrated deterrence and boundary enforcement is framed by critics as **hegemonic bullying**, a charge articulated most clearly by China, which portrays such actions as coercive enforcement disguised as order. Russia has gone further, labeling comparable operations **“state terrorism,”** arguing that leadership seizure collapses the distinction between law enforcement and war. These responses are not fringe rhetoric; they reflect a genuine contest over whether the emerging rules-based order represents adaptive stabilization or dangerous escalation—whether it clarifies limits or accelerates retaliation. Yet sentiment, whether laudatory or condemnatory, does not explain the structure now in motion. Networks tied to **Hezbollah**, the weaponization of humanitarian terrain in **Gaza**, and the mediation brokerage emanating from **Doha** are not discrete challenges; they are interlinked stressors acting on the same Western security substrate. The response has therefore been systemic rather than theatrical. Intelligence fusion, technology transfer, and deterrence signaling occur simultaneously, not sequentially, because the architecture itself is integrated. When one node is stressed, the organism adapts. Venezuela marks an inflection point precisely because this logic was applied outside the traditional Middle Eastern theater. A regime treated as a criminal–terror facilitation node was handled accordingly—not as a peer for indefinite mediation, but as a network to be **interdicted**. Public reaction split sharply. Supporters described the action as liberation from a narco-criminal strongman; critics condemned it as kidnapping, escalation, or war-mongering. Both reactions capture partial truths. This was not historical inevitability, but a **high-risk enforcement experiment**, one that carries real hazards: regional backlash, escalation dynamics, and the specter of quagmire implicit in rhetoric about the United States “running” Venezuela. Those risks are real and must be acknowledged rather than minimized. Clarity, however, also has stabilizing power. Ambiguity invites miscalculation. The rules-based order is not an abstraction floating above power; it is **law made credible by capability**, sustained by partnerships that have evolved beyond symbolism into visible alignment. Acknowledging the U.S.–Israel security structure for what it is—an integrated defensive organism—does not foreclose debate; it frames it honestly. In an era defined by networked threats rather than uniformed armies, the central question is not whether such alignment will provoke argument—it will—but whether **clear, openly enforced boundaries**, even when contested, produce more stability than the pretense that sovereignty alone can contain systems that no longer respect it. A final clarification is necessary to avoid a common misreading. This analysis does not rest on the claim that Israel was operationally involved in the Venezuela action. It rests on the **observable continuity of shared intelligence, threat modeling, and deterrence alignment**, particularly with respect to Iranian networks. The existence of **Hezbollah’s Latin American footprint**—including facilitation, finance, and documentation pathways—is well established, and intelligence cooperation on these networks has long been a standing feature of U.S.–Israeli security coordination. In the immediate aftermath of the Caracas operation, **Israeli ministers publicly framed the event as a signal to Iran**, explicitly stating that Tehran should “pay close attention.” That linkage was not rhetorical opportunism; it reflected a shared analytic frame in which geographically dispersed actions are understood as **systemic deterrence moves** against common adversaries operating across regions and domains. Seen clearly, the U.S.–Israel relationship requires neither inflation nor denial. It reflects how contemporary security systems actually function in a multipolar world: intelligence is shared, technologies are co-developed, deterrence signals are jointly read, and actions in one theater are evaluated for their effects across others. Recognizing this does not imply Israeli operational involvement in Venezuela; it simply acknowledges that enforcement against Iranian-aligned networks never occurs in an informational vacuum, but within a shared strategic frame. **This is the new rules-based order.**

## **Analyst Context: Strategic Effects and Systemic Signals** ### Network Interdiction * Joseph M. Humire argues that removing Maduro raises operating and trust costs for Iran-aligned networks rather than instantly dismantling them, a classic network-disruption effect. He writes that Venezuela under Maduro functioned as a permissive hub where “**Iran-backed networks prop up the Venezuelan regime through illicit finance, facilitation, and protection**,” warning that leadership removal disrupts this protection layer even if the networks persist. Humire (Atlantic Council): “**The Maduro–Hezbollah nexus reveals how Iran-backed networks embed within state structures to facilitate sanctions evasion and illicit activity. Disrupting the regime disrupts the network.**” → **[The Maduro–Hezbollah Nexus: How Iran-Backed Networks Prop Up the Venezuelan Regime](https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/the-maduro-hezbollah-nexus-how-iran-backed-networks-prop-up-the-venezuelan-regime/)** * Jason M. Brodsky characterizes Venezuela as Iran’s primary Western Hemisphere stronghold, noting that Maduro’s fall would “**sever a critical logistics and finance node used by Hezbollah and the IRGC**.” → **[Why Venezuela Matters So Much to Iran](https://www.iranintl.com/en/202509081757)** * Eitan Fischberger adds that Maduro’s capture “**directly damages Tehran’s regional and financial networks tied to Hezbollah**,” emphasizing trust-cost inflation across the ecosystem. → **[X post by Eitan Fischberger on Maduro’s capture and Iranian networks](https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2007501284358992032)** ### Hydrocarbons and Great-Power Competition * Analysts frame Trump’s stated plan to temporarily “run” Venezuela as a denial move in U.S.–China competition, pointing to China’s debt-for-oil dependence on Venezuelan crude. *Ynet* analysis argues the move “**cuts a stable Chinese supply chain and forces Beijing to reprice its energy security assumptions**.” → **[Why Venezuela Is a Strategic Blow to China](https://www.ynetnews.com/opinions-analysis/article/ry5unpi4bx)** * *Axios* notes that China had become Venezuela’s primary oil buyer and that disruption “**denies Beijing discounted access while reopening options for Western markets**.” → **[Why the U.S. Captured Venezuela’s Maduro](https://www.axios.com/2026/01/03/maduro-capture-reasons-us-venezuela)** * Energy analyst Phil Flynn calls the potential redirection a “**game-changer for global oil markets**,” citing Venezuela’s ~303 billion barrels of proven reserves. → **[Oil Markets React to Venezuela Shock](https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/03/business/oil-gas-venezuela-maduro)** ### Brokerage Erosion (Qatar) * Analysts interpret Qatar’s call for restraint as brand defense, arguing unilateral action undercuts Doha’s leverage as an “indispensable intermediary.” Fischberger writes that bypassing mediation “**strips Qatar of much of its geopolitical leverage**.” → **[X post by Eitan Fischberger on Qatar’s mediation role](https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2007501284358992032)** * Michael Pregent adds that Qatar’s condemnation reflects “**damaged ties linked to its role as a financial and diplomatic facilitator alongside Iran and Hezbollah**.” → **[X post by Michael Pregent on Qatar’s reaction](https://x.com/MPPregent/status/2007463206948684061)** * *The New Arab* concludes that unilateral U.S. action “**undermines Qatar’s soft-power strategy built on mediation indispensability**.” → **[Qatar’s Venezuela Mediation and the Limits of Soft Power](https://www.newarab.com/opinion/qatars-venezuela-mediation-soft-power-skin-game)** ### Contagion Signaling to Iran * With Iran facing sustained unrest amid economic collapse, Reuters reports that investors and economists view the capture as “**a warning to Iran’s leadership**,” noting that no explicit pledge is required to alter credibility assessments. → **[Investors, Economists React to U.S. Capture of Venezuela’s Maduro](https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/view-investors-economists-react-us-capture-venezuelas-maduro-2026-01-03/)** * *NBC News* observes that Iran “**will be watching closely**,” as the operation demonstrates U.S. willingness to remove adversaries previously shielded by sovereignty norms. → **[Live Updates: Venezuela Explosions as Trump Announces Maduro Capture](https://www.nbcnews.com/world/latin-america/live-blog/venezuela-explosions-trump-maduro-live-updates-rcna251053)** * Israeli officials explicitly linked the event to Tehran; *The Times of Israel* reports statements warning that “**Iran should pay close attention**.” → **[Trump Links Capture of Maduro to Soleimani Assassination, Strikes on Iran Nuclear Sites](https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/trump-links-capture-of-maduro-to-soleimani-assassination-strikes-on-iran-nuclear-sites/)** ### Norm Fracture and Transition Risk * Legal experts warn the operation strains use-of-force norms, while acknowledging Maduro’s legitimacy deficit. *Just Security* argues the action “**tests the outer limits of international law on aggression**.” → **[Venezuela, the Use of Force, and International Law](https://www.justsecurity.org/127396/venezuela-military-blockade-international-law/)** * Writing in *The Guardian*, Geoffrey Robertson KC and Elvira Domínguez-Redondo contend that the seizure risks constituting “**a crime of aggression**,” even as they recognize the regime’s abuses. → **[Is There Any Legal Justification for the U.S. Attack on Venezuela?](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/03/is-there-any-legal-justification-for-the-us-attack-on-venezuela-trump-maduro)** * Chatham House experts similarly note that while Maduro lacks democratic legitimacy, “**the method employed undermines core Charter principles**.” → **[U.S. Attacks Venezuela and Maduro Is Captured: Early Analysis](https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/01/us-attacks-venezuela-and-maduro-captured-early-analysis-chatham-house-experts)** * Civil society groups such as WOLA warn of transition risks and potential quagmire, reflecting the split public reaction. → **[Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA)](https://x.com/WOLA_org)**

## References ### Primary Event Reporting & Official Statements * **[Reuters — “Trump says U.S. has captured Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro”](https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-says-us-has-captured-venezuelas-president-nicolas-maduro-2026-01-03/)** — Primary wire confirmation of announcement, operational scope, and immediate international reaction. * **[Associated Press — “Trump announces capture of Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro in dramatic military operation”](https://apnews.com/article/trump-venezuela-maduro-captured-military-operation-2026)** — Independent confirmation emphasizing the unprecedented nature of a cross-border leadership seizure. * **[Washington Post — “U.S. seizes Venezuela’s Maduro in extraordinary escalation”](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/01/03/venezuela-maduro-captured-trump/)** — Mainstream framing of escalation, legality questions, and sovereignty shock. * **[Statement by Donald J. Trump from Mar-a-Lago (Jan 3, 2026)](https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/trump-announcement-venezuela-operation)** — Primary executive framing establishing unilateral action and resource-control language. ### Venezuela–Iran–Hezbollah Network Architecture * **[Foundation for Defense of Democracies — “Iran’s Expanding Influence in Latin America”](https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2020/01/15/irans-growing-presence-in-latin-america/)** — Authoritative overview of Tehran’s Western Hemisphere facilitation strategy. * **[InSight Crime — “Venezuela, Hezbollah and the Drug Trade”](https://insightcrime.org/investigations/hezbollah-venezuela-drug-trafficking/)** — Documentation of crime–terror convergence and state permissiveness. * **[U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security — “Hezbollah’s Operations in Latin America” (PDF)](https://homeland.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Hezbollah-Latin-America-Report.pdf)** — Formal congressional analysis of Hezbollah logistics, finance, and regional nodes. * **[Center for a Secure Free Society — “Hezbollah’s Strategic Threat Network in the Americas”](https://www.securefreesociety.org/research/hezbollah-in-the-americas/)** — Network-centric framing supporting trust-cost inflation analysis. ### Network Disruption & Interdiction Theory (Analytical Foundations) * **[RAND — “Disrupting Terrorist Networks”](https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1706.html)** — Foundational theory on decapitation versus friction-based disruption. * **[John Arquilla & David Ronfeldt — “Networks and Netwars”](https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1382.html)** — Classic framework for non-state and hybrid network conflict. ### Oil, China, and Strategic Resource Repricing * **[Reuters — “Trump says U.S. will ‘run’ Venezuela, involve American oil companies”](https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-says-us-will-run-venezuela-involve-us-oil-companies-2026-01-03/)** — Direct linkage between military action and resource reorientation. * **[U.S. Energy Information Administration — “Venezuela: International Energy Data”](https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/VEN)** — Authoritative data on reserves, production, and export flows. * **[Council on Foreign Relations — “China’s Role in Venezuela’s Oil Sector”](https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-investments-venezuela)** — Analysis supporting denial-operations and energy-security repricing. ### Qatar, Mediation, and Brokerage Power * **[Al Jazeera — “Qatar calls for restraint after U.S. operation in Venezuela”](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/3/qatar-reacts-us-venezuela-operation)** — Primary evidence of Doha’s mediation-brand defense signaling. * **[Brookings Institution — “Qatar’s Global Mediation Strategy”](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/qatars-global-mediation-role/)** — Analytical grounding for intermediary leverage dynamics. * **[Carnegie Endowment — “Small State, Big Influence: Qatar as Diplomatic Broker”](https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/06/14/qatar-diplomatic-broker-pub-87291)** — Explanation of brokerage convexity and leverage. ### Iran Unrest & Signaling Effects * **[Reuters — “Iran faces expanding protests amid economic collapse”](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-protests-economic-crisis-2026-01-02/)** — Reporting grounding contagion-signaling analysis. * **[The Guardian — “Iran’s regime under pressure as unrest spreads”](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/02/iran-protests-regime-pressure)** — Coverage emphasizing regime durability uncertainty. * **[Foreign Affairs — “How External Pressure Shapes Iranian Opposition Movements”](https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/iran/2023-09-12/external-pressure-and-iranian-opposition)** — Theoretical support for Bayesian expectation shifts. ### Democratic Legitimacy & Transition Architecture * **[Nobel Prize — “The Nobel Peace Prize 2025: María Corina Machado”](https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2025/machado/facts/)** — Independent legitimacy anchor for transition coordination. * **[Human Rights Watch — “Venezuela: Crimes Against Humanity Under Maduro”](https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/venezuela)** — Substantiation of criminal-state framing. * **[Organization of American States — “Democratic Breakdown in Venezuela”](https://www.oas.org/en/media_center/press_release.asp?sCodigo=E-001/25)** — Regional institutional context for legitimacy transfer. ### International Law, Sovereignty, and Norm Fracture * **[United Nations Charter — Article 2(4): Use of Force](https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/chapter-1)** — Baseline sovereignty norm under stress. * **[Just Security — “Targeting Heads of State: Legal and Normative Implications”](https://www.justsecurity.org/84312/targeting-heads-of-state-international-law/)** — Analysis directly relevant to leadership decapitation legality. * **[International Crisis Group — “The Risks of Foreign Military Intervention in Venezuela”](https://www.crisisgroup.org/latin-america-caribbean/andes/venezuela/foreign-intervention-risks)** — Framing of backlash dynamics and precedent collision.

## Article Analysis Comprehensive research into the January 3, 2026 Venezuelan operation. Based on extensive verification across 100+ sources, the event is confirmed: US forces captured President Nicolás Maduro in Operation Absolute Resolve, marking a significant departure from post-Cold War international norms. Your analysis frames this operation as a prototype of an emerging "rules-based order" where certain regimes are reclassified as criminal-terrorist nodes subject to direct interdiction rather than traditional diplomatic engagement. The research validates your core thesis and network-level analytical framework. Let me now synthesize these findings into a comprehensive report. ### Executive Summary On January 3, 2026, United States special operations forces executed a unilateral military operation inside Venezuela, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores in what President Donald Trump characterized as the culmination of a months-long pressure campaign against what Washington designated a "narco-terrorist regime."[1][2][3] The operation—codenamed Absolute Resolve—involved more than 150 aircraft, Delta Force operators, and precision strikes on Venezuelan air defenses, marking the first forcible removal of a sitting head of state by US forces in Latin America since Manuel Noriega in 1989.[4][5][6] While framed by the administration as a law enforcement action executing an existing federal indictment, the operation constitutes a clear breach of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and has been condemned by international legal scholars, the UN Secretary-General, and major powers including China, Russia, France, and Mexico as a violation of sovereignty and international law.[7][8][9][10] The Maduro extraction represents a strategic inflection in the application of force against states designated as transnational threat networks rather than sovereign peers. By leveraging narco-terrorism designations, Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) classifications applied to the Cartel de los Soles and Tren de Aragua, and an expansive interpretation of executive authority to arrest indicted fugitives abroad, the Trump administration has effectively established a doctrine of conditional sovereignty—wherein egregious criminalization can, in Washington's framework, strip a regime of the protections typically afforded under Westphalian norms.[11][3][7][12] This operation simultaneously served three strategic objectives: disrupting Iranian-backed proxy networks using Venezuela as a permissive hub, redirecting Venezuelan hydrocarbon reserves away from China to impose energy security costs on Beijing, and marginalizing Qatar's brokerage model by demonstrating unilateral coercive capacity.[11][13][14] ### Operational Chronology and Military Build-Up #### Operation Southern Spear: August 2025–January 2026 The Maduro capture culminated a five-month escalation under Operation Southern Spear, formally unveiled by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on November 13, 2025.[15][16] Beginning in mid-August 2025, US Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) deployed the largest concentration of military assets in the Caribbean since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, eventually amassing approximately 12,000–16,000 personnel across nearly a dozen naval vessels, including the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group.[2][16][17] The operation employed a hybrid fleet combining manned platforms—B-52 Stratofortress bombers, AC-130J Ghostrider gunships, F-22 and F-35 fighters—with unmanned surface vessels supplied by Saildrone and robotic interceptor boats designed for persistent maritime domain awareness.[5][16][18] Between September 2025 and January 2026, US forces conducted more than twenty lethal strikes against alleged drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific, killing at least 83 individuals according to initial reports.[8][15] On December 24–26, 2025, the CIA executed the first land-based strike inside Venezuela, targeting a marine facility in La Guaira allegedly used for loading narcotics onto trafficking boats.[1][2][16] Simultaneously, the US Navy began intercepting and seizing Venezuelan oil tankers carrying sanctioned crude, culminating in a de facto naval blockade announced by President Trump on December 17.[2][16] This multi-domain pressure campaign integrated electronic warfare, cyber operations (via US Cyber Command), space-based intelligence (via Space Command), and kinetic strikes to systematically degrade Venezuelan defensive capacity while raising operational costs for networks Washington identified as narco-terrorist enterprises.[5]

Bryant McGill · Operation Absolute Resolve: The Doctrine of Conditional Sovereignty

#### Operation Absolute Resolve: January 2–3, 2026 At 10:46 p.m. Eastern Time on January 2, President Trump authorized the final assault.[5] Over the following two hours and forty-three minutes, US forces executed a meticulously rehearsed sequence: first, airstrikes disabled Venezuelan air defense systems at Fort Tiuna military complex, Miranda Airbase, La Guaira port, and communication antennas on Cerro El Volcán.[4][5] Electronic warfare aircraft created a "pathway" by jamming radar and communications networks, while cyber operations further degraded Venezuelan command-and-control infrastructure.[5][6] Delta Force operators, embarked on helicopters flying 100 feet above the water to evade detection, infiltrated Maduro's compound at the Fort Tiuna base.[5][6] According to General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Maduro and Flores attempted to flee to a safe room but surrendered within seconds of the breach.[5][6] By 3:29 a.m. EST, the extraction force had returned over international waters with both detainees aboard the USS Iwo Jima, having engaged in multiple self-defense firefights during exfiltration.[5][6] The operation's precision reflected months of planning and rehearsal using a full-scale replica of Maduro's residence, with participants ranging in age from 20 to 49.[5][6] No US casualties were reported, though Venezuelan military casualties remain unconfirmed and Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez declared a national state of emergency, demanding "proof of life" for Maduro and mobilizing armed forces.[1][2][4] The rapid sequence—from first strike to exfiltration in under three hours—demonstrated the overwhelming asymmetry in capabilities and the strategic value of forward-deployed assets, extensive intelligence preparation, and Joint Task Force Southern Spear coordination established in October 2025.[5][16] ### Legal Justifications, International Condemnation, and the Panama Precedent #### Domestic Legal Framework The Trump administration advanced three overlapping legal rationales for the operation. First, Attorney General Pam Bondi characterized the mission as execution of an existing criminal indictment filed in March 2020 in the Southern District of New York, charging Maduro with narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, and possession of machine guns and destructive devices.[2][3][19] Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized this framing, stating "at its core, this was an arrest of two indicted fugitives of American justice, and the Department of War supported the Department of Justice in that job."[7][12] This narrative invokes a 1989 Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion authored by then-Attorney General William Barr, which concluded that the FBI's statutory arrest authority authorizes extraterritorial investigations and arrests, that the President may lawfully order such arrests even if they violate customary international law, and crucially, that Article 2(4) of the UN Charter "does not prohibit the Executive as a matter of domestic law from authorizing forcible abductions" abroad.[12] Second, the administration asserted a defensive necessity rationale, with Trump claiming Maduro led the Cartel de los Soles—a drug trafficking network designated as an FTO on November 24, 2025—responsible for flooding the United States with lethal narcotics and sending violent gang members (Tren de Aragua) across the southern border.[7][20][21] This argument constructs a narrative of quasi-armed conflict against non-state actors, analogizing cartel operations to terrorist threats justifying preemptive self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter, though no imminent armed attack meeting the traditional threshold was demonstrated.[8][22] Third, Defense Secretary Hegseth and General Caine framed the military component as force protection for Justice Department personnel executing the arrest warrant, suggesting operational necessity justified the strikes on Venezuelan air defenses and military installations.[7][12] Congressional response fractured along partisan lines. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) defended the operation as "decisive" and legally justified, while Democratic leaders including Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) condemned it as constitutional overreach that "continues Donald Trump's trampling of the Constitution" and "risks our adversaries mirroring this brazen illegal escalation."[7] Notably, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) initially expressed skepticism, seeking constitutional justification absent a declaration of war, but softened his position after Rubio's briefing on force protection, concluding such action "likely falls within the president's inherent authority under Article II."[7] Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) remained skeptical, noting Trump's statements about taking over the country and controlling oil reserves "did not seem the least bit consistent" with a narrow law enforcement characterization.[7] #### International Law Violations International legal scholars and UN officials uniformly condemned the operation as violating core principles of the international legal order. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibits member states from using force "against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."[7][9][23] The two narrow exceptions—authorization by the UN Security Council or self-defense in response to an armed attack—were absent.[8][24] Michael Schmitt, professor emeritus of international law at the US Naval War College, stated unequivocally: "This is a clear violation of international law... Without consent, you cannot engage in investigations or arrest or seizure of criminal property on another state's territory. That's a violation of that state's sovereignty."[7][25] UN Secretary-General António Guterres declared himself "deeply alarmed" and "deeply concerned that the rules of international law have not been respected," warning the operation "constitute[s] a dangerous precedent."[7][10] China's foreign ministry condemned "hegemonic acts of the U.S. [that] seriously violate international law and Venezuela's sovereignty," while France stated the operation "contravenes the principle of the non-use of force that underpins international law."[7] Even US allies expressed concern, with Representative Don Bacon (R-NE) worrying "Russia will use this to justify their illegal and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."[7] The operation potentially meets the ICC definition of the crime of aggression adopted at the 2010 Kampala Review Conference: "the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations."[26][27][28] The Rome Statute explicitly lists "bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State" and "the blockade of the ports or coasts of a State by the armed forces of another State" as acts of aggression—both present in the Venezuelan operation.[26][29] However, ICC jurisdiction over aggression is highly constrained, requiring either Security Council referral or consent from the state parties involved, rendering prosecution of US officials functionally impossible given Washington's non-ratification of the Rome Statute and veto power at the Security Council.[27][30] #### The Panama Precedent and Its Limitations The operation evokes strong parallels to Operation Just Cause, the US invasion of Panama launched December 20, 1989, to capture General Manuel Noriega on drug trafficking charges.[31][32][33] President George H.W. Bush cited protection of US citizens, restoration of democracy, and Noriega's indictment as justifications for deploying approximately 27,000 troops.[34][35] Noriega surrendered on January 3, 1990—exactly 36 years before Maduro's capture—and was subsequently tried and convicted in Miami.[31][33] Critical differences, however, limit the precedent's applicability. First, the US maintained a permanent military presence in Panama through Southern Command headquarters and approximately 14,000 troops managing the Panama Canal Zone under treaty provisions, providing extensive intelligence networks, forward-deployed assets, and operational familiarity with the terrain.[34][35] Venezuela presents none of these advantages: the US embassy closed in 2019, no American forces are garrisoned in-country, and Maduro's government—learning from the 2002 coup attempt against Hugo Chávez—has implemented coup-proofing measures integrating loyalist networks throughout state institutions akin to Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath Party structures.[35] Military analysts estimated a full invasion and occupation of Venezuela would require 100,000 or more US troops, compared to the 27,000 deployed in far smaller Panama.[35] Second, Noriega ruled through puppet presidents and lacked deep popular legitimacy, whereas Maduro commands a more institutionalized authoritarian apparatus with significant sectors of popular support despite economic collapse.[32][35] Third, Panama's geographic compactness and US infrastructure allowed rapid operational tempo; Venezuela's size (roughly twice California) and complex urban terrain in Caracas present far greater challenges.[36][35] These differences underscore that while the Panama precedent provides a historical reference point, the Venezuelan operation required significantly greater military sophistication, involved higher geopolitical risks, and confronted a more entrenched adversary. ### Network Disruption: Iran, Hezbollah, and the Americas Hub #### Iranian Footprint and Proxy Integration Venezuela has functioned as Iran's primary beachhead in the Western Hemisphere since the early 2000s, intensifying under Hugo Chávez and deepening under Maduro.[37][14] A 20-year defense pact signed in 2022 formalized bilateral cooperation encompassing joint manufacturing of Iranian drones and weapons systems on Venezuelan soil, deployment of loitering munitions and jamming devices, and integration of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) operatives with Venezuelan security services.[14][38] This architecture serves Iran's strategic depth objectives: by establishing a foothold 600 miles from US shores, Tehran complicates American freedom of action while creating a permissive environment for Hezbollah operations, sanctions evasion networks, and illicit financial flows.[14][38] Hezbollah's presence in Venezuela dates to the 1990s but expanded dramatically in the 2010s, leveraging Lebanese diaspora communities and corrupt state institutions to establish money laundering, document fraud, and logistical support networks.[39][37][40] The tri-border area between Colombia, Panama, and Venezuela has become strategically critical for Hezbollah-linked operations, complementing the longstanding presence in the Argentina-Brazil-Paraguay Triple Frontier.[39] Recent intelligence indicates Hezbollah has intensified drug trafficking operations in Venezuela as Iranian financial support—historically \$700 million annually, approximately 70 percent of Hezbollah's budget—has declined following Israeli military campaigns against the "Axis of Resistance" in Lebanon and Syria.[40][41] A December 9, 2025 phone call between Maduro and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian emphasized Venezuela as "a true friend and ally of the Islamic Republic" with Iran supporting the country "under any circumstances," underscoring the depth of the partnership.[40] #### Strategic Impact of Maduro's Removal The Maduro capture disrupts these networks along multiple dimensions. First, it eliminates the apex political protection enabling permissive operations; without Maduro's sanction, IRGC and Hezbollah elements lose high-level coordination mechanisms and face increased operational risk from successor authorities who may lack ideological alignment with Tehran.[11][14] Second, it raises trust costs across Iran's transnational network architecture: if the United States can execute a decapitation strike against a protected ally 7,000 miles from Washington, Iran's guarantees to proxy organizations elsewhere lose credibility, potentially degrading recruitment and retention in Iraq, Yemen, and Lebanon.[11] Third, the operation signals that the US-Israel strategic partnership—which has operated as an integrated defensive metabolism in the Middle East—can be applied beyond that theater against adversaries utilizing similar network structures.[11][42][43] The timing coincides with Iran's missile rearmament efforts following the June 2025 twelve-day war with Israel, during which US and Israeli forces struck nuclear facilities at Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordow.[44][45] Israeli intelligence estimates Iran could produce hundreds of ballistic missiles per month once industrial recovery is complete, prompting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to warn that Israel "will attack" if Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear program or missile arsenal.[46][47] By removing Maduro, the US degrades one node in Iran's sanctions evasion and arms procurement network at precisely the moment Tehran requires external lifelines to reconstitute strategic capabilities.[47][44] Whether this disruption proves temporary or permanent depends on Venezuela's political trajectory and the extent to which successor authorities maintain or sever ties with Tehran. ### Resource Reorientation: China, Venezuela's Oil, and Energy Security Leverage #### China's Venezuelan Hydrocarbon Dependency Venezuela possesses the world's largest proven oil reserves—approximately 303 billion barrels, representing roughly 17 percent of global reserves and nearly four times US reserves.[36][48] Despite this resource endowment, decades of underinvestment, nationalization of foreign firms, corruption, and sanctions have degraded production capacity from over three million barrels per day (bpd) in the 1990s to below one million bpd by 2025.[13][36] China has emerged as the dominant purchaser of Venezuelan crude, though it represents only approximately four percent of China's total crude imports.[13] In December 2025, tanker tracking firms Vortexa and Kpler estimated Chinese arrivals of Venezuela's Merey crude grade would exceed 600,000 bpd—a record driven by discounts and pre-positioning ahead of anticipated US sanctions tightening.[13] This relatively modest share of Chinese energy supply has led some analysts to question whether the Venezuelan operation meaningfully impacts Beijing's energy security. However, strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) dynamics complicate this assessment. China's three-phase SPR program aims to eventually provide 103 million barrels of storage capacity across facilities at Zhenhai, Aoshan, Xingang, and Huangdao, with additional capacity planned.[49] The International Energy Agency projects China's net oil imports will rise from 3.7 million bpd in 2007 to 13.1 million bpd by 2030, meaning China's SPR would cover only slightly over 70 days of imports at that consumption level.[49] Any sudden loss of Venezuelan supply—even at 600,000 bpd—forces China to draw down strategic reserves or rapidly substitute alternative sources, both of which carry economic and strategic costs.[49][50] #### Trump's Resource Control Strategy President Trump explicitly articulated a resource control objective in his January 3 press conference: "We are going to have our very large United States oil companies go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken oil infrastructure and start making money for the country... we'll be selling oil likely in much larger quantities."[51][36][52] This statement reveals an intent to redirect Venezuelan hydrocarbon flows away from China toward US-aligned markets, effectively weaponizing energy access as a denial operation in great-power competition.[11][50] The strategy resembles Cold War-era resource denial campaigns: by controlling Venezuelan oil, Washington can reprice Beijing's energy security options, forcing China to rely more heavily on sea lines of communication through the Malacca Strait (subject to US naval dominance) or overland pipelines from Russia and Central Asia (politically and economically costly).[49][50] Venezuelan oil's heavy, sulfur-laden composition requires specialized refining capacity that China has been developing through joint ventures with Venezuela, including plans for three dedicated refineries.[49] US control of Venezuelan crude production disrupts these long-term infrastructure investments, forcing China to either write off sunk costs or negotiate access on terms more favorable to Washington.[49] Moreover, as energy consultancy XAnalysts founder Mukesh Sahdev noted, Venezuelan oil shipments to China spiked in late 2025 as Caracas rushed exports "in anticipation of sanctions," meaning December arrivals represented pre-positioning rather than sustainable supply.[13] By February 2026, the impact of tanker seizures and production disruption under US oversight will materialize, creating a supply gap that alternative sources cannot immediately fill.[13] Critics note the inherent contradiction in Trump's "America First" framework pursuing overseas nation-building and oil infrastructure reconstruction projects that could cost tens of billions of dollars and require years to materialize.[53] Energy executives expressed wariness about the proposition, particularly given Venezuela's history of expropriating foreign oil assets and the uncertain political environment following Maduro's removal.[53] Nonetheless, the operation establishes a precedent for resource control as a strategic objective distinct from traditional regime change for democracy promotion, framing geopolitical competition through the lens of denying adversaries access to critical commodities.[11][50] ### Brokerage Destruction: Qatar, Mediation Markets, and the Bypass Strategy #### Qatar's Indispensable Mediator Model Since the 1990s, Qatar has cultivated a distinctive foreign policy identity as a neutral broker capable of facilitating dialogue between adversaries no other actor can convene.[54][55][56] This positioning has enabled Qatar to mediate negotiations between the United States and the Taliban (culminating in the 2021 Doha Agreement), between Israel and Hamas (including hostage releases following October 7, 2023), between feuding Lebanese factions, and in conflicts spanning Yemen, Darfur, and Sudan.[54][55][57] The mediation strategy serves multiple objectives: enhancing Qatar's international standing despite its small size (population under three million), securing protection against regional rivals Saudi Arabia and the UAE (demonstrated during the 2017–2021 blockade), and establishing itself as an essential partner to Western powers who require backdoor channels to proscribed groups.[54][55][57] Qatar's leverage derives from several unique assets. First, it hosts the political offices of Hamas, Taliban, and other groups in Doha, providing physical access unavailable elsewhere.[55][57] Second, it provides millions of dollars in annual foreign aid to Gaza, Yemen, and Lebanon, creating financial dependencies that grant influence over recipient organizations.[55] Third, its gas wealth (massive liquefied natural gas exports) enables economic inducements and reconstruction pledges that sweeten negotiated settlements.[55][56] Fourth, its willingness to maintain relations with actors across ideological divides—from revolutionary Iran to monarchical Gulf states, from Hamas to Israel, from the US to Russia—gives Qatar unique convening authority.[55][57][56] International relations scholars describe this as "soft diplomacy" leveraging financial resources and political influence to facilitate dialogue, often positioning Qatar as the "indispensable intermediary" whose participation becomes essential for conflict resolution.[54][55] Professor Sultan Barakat of Hamad Bin Khalifa University argues Qatar has greater credibility than Egypt in mediating Israeli-Palestinian issues because "Israel wants to push millions of Palestinians in the Sinai. Egypt can't mediate if it is also at the receiving end of the conflict."[55] This highlights how Qatar's perceived neutrality—grounded in geographic distance and lack of direct territorial stakes—differentiates it from regional competitors. #### The Venezuelan Bypass and Brokerage-Value Destruction The Maduro operation demonstrates a fundamentally different approach: unilateral coercive action bypassing mediation frameworks entirely.[11] Rather than engaging Qatar, Egypt, or other potential brokers to negotiate Maduro's exit—a model that might have involved exile arrangements, amnesty guarantees, or power-sharing transitions—the Trump administration opted for forcible extraction justified through criminal law rather than diplomatic settlement.[11][7] This bypassing destroys brokerage value along several dimensions. First, it reveals that the "indispensable intermediary" status Qatar carefully cultivated is contingent rather than structural: if a major power possesses sufficient military capacity and political will to impose outcomes unilaterally, mediation becomes superfluous.[11] Second, it reduces Qatar's future leverage in negotiations where parties know the US may simply bypass diplomatic channels if dissatisfied with progress, lowering the convex returns to Qatari mediation services.[11] Third, it marginalizes the multilateral UN framework—where Qatar often operates as coordinator—in favor of raw power projection, degrading the institutional environment in which Qatar's mediation model thrives.[10] The operation sends a broader signal to all mediation-dependent actors: the United States under Trump prioritizes speed and decisiveness over process legitimacy, reducing the value of protracted negotiations that might otherwise produce face-saving exits for besieged leaders. This shift disadvantages not only Qatar but also other aspiring mediators—Turkey, Oman, Norway—who have invested in building neutral broker reputations.[55][57] If major powers increasingly view mediation as delaying accountability for criminalized regimes, the mediation market itself contracts, forcing brokers to compete for a shrinking pool of conflicts where negotiated settlements remain politically viable. ### The Norm Fracture Zone: Sovereignty as Conditional Privilege #### Competing Legal Ontologies The Venezuelan operation sits squarely in what can be termed a "norm fracture zone"—a space where competing legal frameworks offer ontologically incompatible interpretations of the same event, with neither side's position reducible to the other's logic.[11] On one side, traditional Westphalian sovereignty doctrines hold that Article 2(4) prohibits the use of force against territorial integrity regardless of a state's internal governance or alleged criminal behavior, absent Security Council authorization or genuine self-defense against armed attack.[7][9][23] This view, articulated by UN officials and most international legal scholars, treats the Venezuelan operation as a crime of aggression—a manifest violation of the UN Charter that threatens the foundational norm structure of the post-1945 international system.[7][8][10] On the opposing side, the Trump administration advances what can be characterized as a "reclassification doctrine": certain regimes, through egregious criminalization (narco-terrorism, state sponsorship of terrorism, crimes against humanity), effectively forfeit sovereignty protections and become subject to universal jurisdiction-style interdiction.[11][12] This doctrine analogizes narco-terrorist states to historical pirates—hostis humani generis, enemies of all mankind—who could be apprehended by any state regardless of territorial location.[58] Under this logic, Maduro was not a head of state entitled to immunity but rather an indicted criminal fugitive leading a transnational criminal organization, making his arrest a law enforcement action rather than an act of war.[7][12] These positions are not reconcilable through legal argumentation because they rest on fundamentally different premises about the nature of sovereignty. The Westphalian view treats sovereignty as an ontological fact—a status inherent in statehood that persists regardless of regime behavior short of complete state collapse.[23][59] The reclassification doctrine treats sovereignty as a conditional privilege—a status conferred by the international community and revocable when a regime's behavior transgresses boundaries so severe (systematic drug trafficking, harboring terrorists, crimes against humanity) that continued recognition becomes untenable.[11][60] Neither side's claims are falsifiable within the other's framework: traditional lawyers insist the US violated international law; US officials assert that egregious criminalization changes the legal category to which Venezuela belongs.[7][12] #### Responsibility to Protect and the Conditional Sovereignty Gradient The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, adopted at the 2005 UN World Summit, established a precedent for conditional sovereignty in the humanitarian context: states failing to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, or crimes against humanity lose immunity from external intervention.[61][62][63] R2P's three pillars—(1) state responsibility to protect, (2) international assistance and capacity-building, and (3) timely and decisive response when states manifestly fail—reframed sovereignty from an absolute right of non-interference to a responsibility contingent on protecting human rights.[63][64] The 2011 Libya intervention tested R2P's practical application when the UN Security Council authorized Resolution 1973, establishing a no-fly zone and authorizing "all necessary measures" to protect civilians from Muammar Gaddafi's forces threatening a massacre in Benghazi.[65][62][66] NATO's implementation, however, extended well beyond civilian protection to active regime change, with airstrikes targeting Gaddafi's compound and supporting rebel advances culminating in his capture and death.[67][62][63] This "mission creep" generated fierce backlash, particularly from Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS countries), who argued that NATO had exploited the humanitarian mandate to pursue geopolitical objectives.[68][64] The Syria crisis that followed saw Russia and China block similar resolutions, paralyzing the Security Council and effectively killing R2P as a viable basis for military intervention.[69][65] The Venezuelan operation extends conditional sovereignty logic from the humanitarian domain (mass atrocities) to the security-criminality domain (narco-terrorism and transnational organized crime).[11] Whereas R2P required Security Council authorization and framed intervention as protection of innocent civilians, the reclassification doctrine asserts unilateral authority and frames intervention as law enforcement against criminal leadership.[11][7][12] This shift has profound implications: if states can be reclassified as criminal enterprises subject to interdiction without multilateral approval, the Security Council's gatekeeping function collapses, and any powerful state with the capacity to enforce its designation can execute regime change operations.[7][8] Critics warn this creates a precedent for Russian action against Ukraine (framed as de-Nazification) or Chinese intervention in Taiwan (framed as suppressing separatism), fundamentally destabilizing the rules-based order.[7] #### The Accreting Precedent and Emergent Custom International law scholar Michael Schmitt emphasized that the Venezuelan operation, while clearly violating current norms, could reshape customary international law if similar actions proliferate and gain acquiescence: "The legality of humanitarian intervention and self-defense has evolved through state practice. If powerful states repeatedly act on a reclassification principle and other states tolerate or support such actions, a new customary norm may emerge."[7][25] This accreting precedent dynamic means the future international order will be determined not by which argument is logically superior but by which pattern of behavior becomes normalized through repetition and lack of effective resistance.[11] Several factors will influence whether the reclassification doctrine crystallizes into accepted practice or remains an outlier violation. First, reactions from major powers: if China, Russia, and European states impose costs on the US—economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation, military support to Venezuela—the precedent weakens. If they issue statements of concern but take no concrete action, tacit acquiescence strengthens the precedent.[7] Second, whether other states adopt similar reasoning: if France invokes criminal designation to intervene in a Sahel state, or Israel uses narco-terrorism justifications for operations beyond its borders, a pattern emerges. Third, outcomes in Venezuela: if democratic transition occurs smoothly and Venezuelan oil returns to global markets at reasonable prices, the operation may be retrospectively legitimized despite procedural violations, whereas humanitarian catastrophe or prolonged instability would vindicate critics.[2][70] The norm fracture thus creates a metastable condition: the international legal system has not collapsed, but a fault line has opened along which further stress may propagate. Traditional sovereignty defenders are correct that the Venezuelan operation violated foundational principles; reclassification advocates are correct that the practical consequence of their doctrine is conditional sovereignty enforced by the militarily capable. Both things are true simultaneously, and the friction between these truths defines the contemporary crisis in international law.[11][7] ### US-Israel Strategic Metabolism and Cross-Theater Application #### Integrated Defense Architecture Your analysis posits that the US-Israel relationship functions as "a single defensive metabolism distributed over two sovereign platforms—Israel as forward experimental edge, the U.S. as depth and macro-deterrent."[11] This characterization finds empirical support in recent bilateral defense initiatives. The United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025, introduced in the Senate in February, explicitly aims to "enhance bilateral defense cooperation" through joint programs on counter-unmanned systems, emerging technologies (AI, cybersecurity, robotics, quantum), and integrated air and missile defense.[43] Exercise Intrinsic Defender 2025, conducted December 7–11, 2025 in Israeli waters, involved US 5th Fleet forces and focused on visit/board/search/seizure operations, maritime domain awareness using P-8 Poseidon aircraft, and joint medical training—all capabilities directly applicable to Caribbean interdiction operations.[42][71] The scale and frequency of US-Israel military exercises have intensified markedly. Exercise Juniper Oak 23.2, completed in July 2025, constituted the largest bilateral exercise in history, involving approximately 6,400 US service members and over 1,500 Israeli troops.[72] These exercises rehearse interoperability protocols, test integrated command-and-control systems, and refine joint operational concepts applicable across theaters. Critically, Israel's realignment from European Command to Central Command's area of responsibility in September 2021 positioned the partnership within the same geographic combatant command overseeing operations against Iran, its proxies, and now Venezuela (via USSOUTHCOM coordination).[42] This integrated architecture enables bidirectional knowledge transfer. Israeli innovations in counter-drone technology, urban warfare tactics, and targeted strikes against non-state actor networks—refined through operations against Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad—inform US approaches to cartels, gangs, and Iranian proxies in the Americas.[43] Conversely, US capabilities in strategic airlift, carrier-based aviation, and global intelligence fusion enhance Israel's long-range strike options and situational awareness regarding Iranian activities in Venezuela, Syria, and Lebanon.[43][72] The metabolism analogy captures this symbiotic dynamic: neither partner is simply supporting the other; rather, they constitute an integrated system where capabilities developed for one theater (Middle East missile defense) translate into applications elsewhere (Caribbean interdiction operations).[11] #### Deterrence Signaling and the Iran Escalation Ladder Israel's messaging in the second half of 2025 explicitly framed missile proliferation—not just nuclear development—as a red line justifying preemptive strikes.[46][47] At a December 2025 graduation ceremony for Israeli air force pilots, Prime Minister Netanyahu warned that Israel is "closely monitoring the rearmament activities of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran," stating unequivocally: "If you try to rebuild the nuclear program or rearm with ballistic missiles, the state of Israel will attack."[46] Defense Minister and Air Force Commander remarks at the same event reinforced this posture, signaling consensus within Israel's security establishment.[46] Israeli intelligence estimates suggest Iran could produce hundreds of ballistic missiles per month once industrial recovery from the June 2025 war is complete, creating a window of vulnerability that incentivizes preemptive action.[47] Iran's response has been defiant. Banners erected in Tehran in late December 2025 displayed images of Israeli targets struck during the June war—including Nevatim airbase, Haifa refinery, and Qatar's Al-Udeid base hosting US forces—with the caption "It Will Happen Again."[44] Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Ali Naeini stated, "Israel should remember the blows it received in the recent war and take a lesson from the previous attack before thinking of entering a new one... Iran's power is increasing by the day."[44] This rhetoric underscores Tehran's reliance on deterrence through demonstrated missile capability, even as Israel and the US work to degrade that capability through strikes on production facilities and supply networks.[44][45] The Venezuelan operation fits this deterrence ecosystem by degrading one node in Iran's transnational support network. By removing Maduro—a key ally providing sanctuary, financial flows, and sanctions evasion mechanisms—the US imposes costs on Iran's efforts to reconstitute missile and nuclear capabilities following the June strikes.[11][14] This demonstrates alignment between US actions in the Caribbean and Israeli strategic priorities in the Middle East, reinforcing your thesis that the US-Israel metabolism operates systemically across theaters rather than being confined to the Levant.[11] When Israeli officials issue warnings toward Iran, they do so knowing the United States has demonstrated willingness to execute high-risk operations against Iranian proxies globally, enhancing the credibility of Israeli deterrence threats.[11][46][44] ### María Corina Machado, Democratic Legitimacy, and the Normative Anchor #### Nobel Laureate as Coordination Mechanism The operation's strategic narrative relies heavily on María Corina Machado's legitimacy as 2025 Nobel Peace Prize laureate "for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela and for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy."[73][74][75] After winning the prize in October 2025, Machado—who had been forced underground for sixteen months facing Maduro's persecution—emerged as the international face of Venezuela's democratic opposition.[73][76] Her Nobel credentials provide a coordination mechanism that distinguishes the Venezuelan operation from pure regime change: rather than imposing an externally selected leader, the US can claim to be facilitating the will of the Venezuelan people as expressed through the July 28, 2024 presidential election.[11][77][70] Opposition candidate Edmundo González Urrutia won that election by a two-to-one margin according to more than 80 percent of printed tally sheets, which the opposition collected and published when the Maduro-controlled National Electoral Council refused to release official vote counts.[77][70][78] The United States, European Union, Argentina, and numerous other countries recognized González as the legitimate president-elect, with González describing himself as "President-elect of Venezuela" across social media and official statements.[70][78][79] Machado, who had been disqualified from running through judicial manipulation, became the movement's strategic leader and moral authority, unifying the opposition under the Unitary Platform coalition.[73][80][70] Hours after Maduro's capture, Machado released a letter describing the moment as "the hour of freedom," asserting Maduro would "face international justice for the atrocious crimes" committed.[81][70] She pledged to restore popular sovereignty, free political prisoners, rebuild infrastructure, and bring Venezuelan families home, framing the transition as indigenous rather than externally imposed.[70][82] Fox News analyst Jorge Jraissati, president of the Economic Inclusion Group, predicted "Machado and González would assume a transitional government in Venezuela... They have the support of 70% of Venezuelans. They would lead this transition period."[70][82] This narrative—that the operation merely enforced an election outcome Maduro stole—attempts to mitigate normative objections by separating criticism of the method (unilateral military force) from support for the outcome (democratic transition).[11] #### Trump's Skepticism and Governance Uncertainty President Trump, however, expressed reservations about Machado's capacity to lead, stating at the January 3 press conference: "I think it'd be very tough for her to be the leader. She doesn't have the support or the respect within the country. She's a very nice woman, but she doesn't have the respect."[70][82] This comment injects uncertainty into the transition narrative, suggesting the Trump administration may not fully defer to Venezuelan opposition leadership but rather seek a managed transition under US oversight.[70] Trump's declaration that "we are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition" implies extended US involvement potentially lasting months or years, resembling occupation more than facilitation.[2][70][82] This ambiguity creates strategic risks. If the US imposes technocratic administrators or favors figures with closer Washington ties over Machado and González—who enjoy domestic legitimacy but may resist US economic restructuring plans—the operation loses its democratic legitimation narrative and becomes nakedly neocolonial.[70] Machado's critics, including some Latin American leftists and anti-imperialist scholars, note her 2018 invocation of the "Responsibility to Protect" and appeals for international military intervention, suggesting she provided cover for exactly the kind of operation that occurred.[83] Whether Machado's Nobel Prize and electoral legitimacy prove sufficient to anchor a democratic transition, or whether they become fig leaves for extended US control, will determine the operation's long-term normative assessment.[70][82] ### Strategic Implications and Future Trajectories #### Precedent Contagion and Great-Power Mimicry The most immediate danger lies in precedent contagion: authoritarian powers citing the Venezuelan operation to justify their own sovereignty violations. Russia could invoke the reclassification doctrine to legitimize deeper intervention in Ukraine, framing Kyiv as a "narco-terrorist regime" (building on existing disinformation about drug trafficking) or claiming "law enforcement" justifications for capturing Ukrainian officials indicted in Russian courts.[7] China could apply similar logic to Taiwan, designating pro-independence leaders as "terrorists" under its Anti-Secession Law and asserting a right to arrest them, with military operations framed as force protection for law enforcement personnel.[7] Even democratic states might be tempted: France could designate Sahel coup leaders as terrorists enabling forcible extractions, or India could pursue Pakistani officials in Kashmir using transnational terror networks as justification. Representative Don Bacon's concern—that "Russia will use this to justify their illegal and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan"—identifies the core problem: once the Westphalian norm prohibiting forcible intervention is breached by a major power, the normative infrastructure constraining all powers weakens.[7] The international order does not collapse instantly, but the threshold for justified force lowers incrementally with each violation, creating a ratchet effect toward instability.[7][84] Even if the Venezuelan operation proves an isolated case, the mere demonstration that forcible regime change against an ostensibly criminal government faces limited consequences beyond rhetorical condemnation alters strategic calculations globally.[7] #### Network Warfare as Organizing Principle The operation validates network warfare theory as an organizing principle for 21st-century conflict. Rather than traditional state-versus-state confrontations over territory, the emerging paradigm treats adversaries as nodes within transnational networks spanning state sponsors (Iran, Venezuela), non-state proxies (Hezbollah, Cartel de los Soles, Tren de Aragua), and enablers (corrupt officials, sanctions-evading firms, cryptocurrency facilitators).[11][14][20] Under this framework, targeting any node—whether through kinetic strikes, financial sanctions, cyberattacks, or leadership removal—imposes costs and trust deficits across the entire network, degrading collective capacity even if individual nodes remain operational.[11] The FTO designation mechanism becomes central to this strategy. By classifying Cartel de los Soles and Tren de Aragua as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, the Trump administration unlocked legal authorities for financial surveillance, asset seizures, and military action that criminal designations alone would not provide.[20][85][21] This hybrid categorization—treating profit-driven criminal organizations as terrorists despite their lack of ideological motivation—reflects the blurring of traditional distinctions between organized crime and terrorism in an era where both employ similar networked structures, transnational logistics, and violence-as-communication tactics.[20][86][87] Mexican cartels' beheadings, ISIS-style propaganda videos, and territorial control resemble terrorist modus operandi, even though ultimate objectives (profit versus ideological transformation) differ.[20][86] Critics argue this conflation enables militarization of law enforcement while eliding important distinctions: cartels are vulnerable to deterrence because members want to enjoy their wealth, whereas ideologically motivated terrorists accept martyrdom.[20] Designating cartels as terrorists may drive them toward more extreme violence to justify the label, a self-fulfilling prophecy dynamic.[88][89] Nonetheless, the trend toward network-centric threat framing appears irreversible as states confront adversaries who exploit the seams between domestic law enforcement, international security, and hybrid warfare.[20][87] #### China's Energy Vulnerability and Hedging Strategies The Venezuelan operation exposes a latent vulnerability in China's energy security architecture. Despite Venezuela representing only four percent of Chinese crude imports, the sudden loss of 600,000 barrels per day forces adjustments across supply chains, strategic petroleum reserve drawdowns, and diplomatic scrambles to secure alternative sources—all of which carry economic costs and reveal dependencies.[13][49][50] If the United States can credibly threaten to deny China access to Western Hemisphere hydrocarbons (not just Venezuela but potentially Mexico and Brazil depending on political alignments), Beijing faces a renewed imperative to diversify suppliers and routes.[49][50] This dynamic strengthens China's incentives to deepen energy partnerships with Russia, Central Asian republics, and Middle Eastern exporters, but each alternative carries distinct vulnerabilities. Russian pipelines require massive infrastructure investments and create dependencies that Beijing historically resisted to maintain strategic autonomy.[49] Middle Eastern supplies transit the Strait of Hormuz and Malacca chokepoints, both subject to US naval interdiction in conflict scenarios.[49] Land routes through Central Asia face geopolitical instability and transit countries (Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan) with complex relationships to both China and Russia.[49] Venezuela's attractiveness lay precisely in its Western Hemisphere location, insulated from Eurasian chokepoints and potential US-China maritime conflict zones—advantages now negated by Washington's direct control.[49][50] Chinese analysts are likely gaming scenarios where the US employs energy access denial as a coercive tool, potentially designating Chinese firms purchasing Venezuelan crude as sanctions violators or interdicting tankers in international waters under maritime drug trafficking authorities (as precedented in recent operations).[13][16] This weaponization of energy flows marks a return to Cold War-era economic warfare strategies, with hydrocarbon access replacing rare earth minerals or semiconductors as the contested resource.[49][50] China's response will likely combine accelerated domestic production (shale, offshore), massive investment in alternative energy (solar, nuclear), and military modernization to protect sea lines of communication—a multidimensional hedging strategy driven by the demonstrated vulnerability exposed in Venezuela.[49] #### Qatar's Strategic Recalibration The marginalization of mediation-based conflict resolution in the Venezuelan case forces Qatar to recalibrate its foreign policy value proposition. If major powers increasingly view negotiated settlements as undesirable—prolonging criminal regimes, rewarding bad behavior, enabling adversaries to regroup—Qatar's core service offering loses market share.[11][55] This trend predates Venezuela: the Syria crisis saw Russia and China blocking R2P-style interventions, paralyzing the Security Council and demonstrating that mediation depends on great-power consensus Qatar cannot manufacture.[69][65] The Afghanistan withdrawal—despite Qatar's extensive Taliban mediation—produced chaotic outcomes that undermined confidence in negotiated solutions to entrenched conflicts.[54][57] Qatar's likely response involves several adaptations. First, diversifying beyond conflict mediation into post-conflict reconstruction, infrastructure financing, and stabilization operations where its gas wealth enables tangible contributions beyond convening authority.[90] Second, emphasizing mediation in conflicts where major powers genuinely desire negotiated outcomes—Israeli-Palestinian hostage exchanges, regional de-escalation agreements, sanctions relief negotiations—rather than pursuing mediator roles where unilateral coercion has already been decided.[55][57] Third, strengthening bilateral relationships with both the US and adversarial actors (Iran, Russia) to maintain access across divides even as the mediation market contracts, preserving optionality for future scenarios where diplomacy resurges.[54][56] The broader implication is a decline in neutral broker states' influence within the international system. Norway, Oman, Switzerland, and other traditional mediators face similar pressures as powerful states opt for imposed solutions over negotiated compromises.[55][57] This shift disadvantages small states whose influence derived from diplomatic services rather than military capacity, concentrating power further among major military powers capable of unilateral action.[90] If the post-Cold War "multilateral moment"—characterized by UN-led peacekeeping, international criminal tribunals, and diplomatic conflict resolution—has ended, small states must find alternative niches (technology, finance, cultural diplomacy) or accept marginalization in a more Hobbesian international order.[54][90] ### Conclusion: The Venezuela Stress Test and Conditional Sovereignty's Future The January 3, 2026 capture of Nicolás Maduro represents a high-variance enforcement experiment in a transitional international order, where traditional Westphalian sovereignty norms confront emergent doctrines treating egregiously criminalized regimes as non-sovereign threat networks subject to interdiction.[11] The operation simultaneously achieved three strategic objectives: degrading Iranian proxy networks by removing a key node and imposing trust costs across the Axis of Resistance architecture; redirecting Venezuelan hydrocarbon flows away from China to impose energy security vulnerabilities on Beijing; and demonstrating that US unilateral coercive capacity can bypass mediation frameworks, reducing brokerage value for actors like Qatar.[11][13][14] Whether this operation crystallizes into a sustainable precedent or remains an outlier violation depends on responses across three dimensions. First, international reactions: if major powers impose meaningful costs—economic sanctions, military support to Venezuela's restoration, diplomatic isolation—the precedent weakens; if rhetorical condemnation proceeds without consequence, tacit acquiescence strengthens the reclassification doctrine.[7] Second, Venezuelan outcomes: smooth democratic transition and economic recovery retrospectively legitimize the method despite procedural violations, whereas humanitarian catastrophe or prolonged occupation vindicate critics' warnings.[2][70] Third, mimicry by other powers: if Russia, China, or regional actors invoke similar criminal designation logic to justify sovereignty violations, a pattern emerges threatening systemic stability; if the US remains the sole practitioner, the operation appears as hegemonic exceptionalism rather than a new norm.[7] Your analysis correctly identifies this as a norm-fracture zone where competing legal frameworks offer ontologically incompatible interpretations—neither reducible to the other's logic—with the future order determined by which pattern of behavior accretes into customary practice through repetition and acquiescence rather than formal legal amendment.[11] The Venezuelan operation does not mark the death of Article 2(4), but it reveals the growing divergence between formal legal structures enshrined in the UN Charter and operational realities where powerful states invoke alternative justifications (law enforcement, counter-terrorism, criminal interdiction) to pursue strategic objectives that traditional sovereignty norms would prohibit.[7][12][24] The US-Israel strategic metabolism—integrating defense innovation, joint exercises, and deterrence signaling across the Middle East and now the Caribbean—demonstrates how bilateral partnerships can project power beyond their immediate regions when conceptualized as integrated systems rather than discrete alliances.[11][42][43] The application of Israeli-refined urban warfare, counter-proxy network, and targeted strike methodologies to Venezuelan operations, combined with US global logistics and intelligence fusion, validates your characterization of this relationship as a "single defensive metabolism distributed over two sovereign platforms."[11][72] María Corina Machado's Nobel Prize provides the operation's normative anchor, attempting to distinguish enforcement of democratic will from pure regime change, but Trump's skepticism about her leadership and statements about extended US control inject uncertainty into the transition narrative.[73][70][82] Whether Machado and Edmundo González assume power with genuine autonomy or function as legitimation cover for US-managed governance will determine whether the operation is remembered as facilitating democracy or imposing neocolonial administration.[70][82] The Venezuelan stress test thus clarifies stakes in the broader contest over international order: advocates of rules-based multilateralism see existential threat to the normative infrastructure preventing great-power aggression, while proponents of conditional sovereignty see necessary adaptation to 21st-century threats that traditional Westphalian categories cannot accommodate.[7][12][60] Both perspectives contain truth, and the friction between these truths—the simultaneous validity of "this violates international law" and "this enforces accountability for transnational criminality"—defines the contemporary crisis in global governance.[11][7] The Venezuelan operation will not be the last such stress test, and each subsequent iteration will clarify whether the world is witnessing the birth of a new order or the decay of an old one. Sources [1] Live - Trump says US 'will run' Venezuela until 'safe' transition https://www.euronews.com/2026/01/03/us-strikes-venezuela-and-says-maduro-captured [2] U.S. strikes Venezuela and captures Maduro; Trump says "we're going to run the country" for now https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/venezuela-us-military-strikes-maduro-trump/ [3] U.S. Captures Venezuelan Dictator Nicolas Maduro Following Military Operation in Caracas https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2026/01/03/u-s-captures-venezuelan-dictator-nicolas-maduro-following-military-operation-in-caracas/ [4] 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_strikes_in_Venezuela [5] How ‘Absolute Resolve’ harnessed 150 aircraft and more to launch a regime change in Venezuela https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2026/01/inside-absolute-resolve-regime-change-assault-venezuela/410440/ [6] US military details timeline of operation to capture Maduro, revealing more than 150 aircraft involved https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-military-details-timeline-operation-capture-maduro-revealing-more-than-150-aircraft-involved [7] U.S. capture of Maduro in Venezuela criticized as violation of international, U.S. law https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-01-03/u-s-capture-of-maduro-in-venezuela-criticized-as-violation-of-international-u-s-law [8] Sliding Toward Aggression: America's Venezuela Campaign and the Unraveling of International Law https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2026/01/sliding-toward-aggression-americas-venezuela-campaign-and-the-unraveling-of-international-law/ [9] Is It Legal for U.S. to ‘Run’ Venezuela After Maduro’s Capture? Here’s What to Know. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/03/us/maduro-venezuela-trump-legal-issues.html [10] US actions in Venezuela ‘constitute a dangerous precedent’: Guterres https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/01/1166698 [11] Trump Orders Capture of Venezuela’s Maduro, Signaling the New Rules-Based Order https://bryantmcgill.blogspot.com/2026/01/new-rules-based-order.html [12] On the Legality of the Venezuela Invasion https://www.execfunctions.org/p/on-the-legality-of-the-venezuela [13] Ample oil supply shields China from impact of Venezuela disruption, for now https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/ample-oil-supply-shields-china-impact-venezuela-disruption-now-2025-12-15/ [14] The Cross-Continental Threat: Iran and Venezuela's U.S.-Defying ... https://jinsa.org/the-cross-continental-threat-iran-and-venezuelas-us-defying-partnership/ [15] The U.S. Military Campaign Targeting Venezuela and Nicolás Maduro: What to Know https://www.cfr.org/article/operation-southern-spear-us-military-campaign-targeting-venezuela [16] Operation Southern Spear - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Southern_Spear [17] A timeline of the US military's buildup and strikes against Venezuela ... https://abc7news.com/post/nicolas-maduro-venezuela-news-timeline-us-military-buildup-strikes-leading-capture-donald-trump/18347527/ [18] Operation Southern Spear: Latest Development in Operationalizing ... https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/Press-Releases/display-pressreleases/Article/4044322/operation-southern-spear-latest-development-in-operationalizing-robotic-and-aut/ [19] After capture of Nicolás Maduro, is the US now at war with Venezuela https://news.northeastern.edu/2026/01/03/us-captures-nicolas-maduro-regime-change/ [20] When Crime Becomes Terror: Rethinking the FTO Designation - CSIS https://www.csis.org/analysis/when-crime-becomes-terror-rethinking-fto-designation [21] Terrorist Designations of Cartel de los Soles - State Department https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/11/terrorist-designations-of-cartel-de-los-soles [22] [PDF] Limitless Discretion in the Wars on Drugs and Terror https://lawreview.colorado.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Said-Limitless-Discretion-in-the-Wars-on-Drugs-and-Terror.pdf [23] Westphalian system - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westphalian_system [24] A LAW WITHOUT TEETH? THE LIMITS AND RELEVANCE OF UN ... https://warroom.armywarcollege.edu/articles/un-article-2-4/ [25] Maduro's capture and Trump's claim that U.S. will run Venezuela raise new legal questions https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/maduros-capture-and-trumps-claim-that-u-s-will-run-venezuela-raise-new-legal-questions [26] Definition of the crime of aggression https://crimeofaggression.info/role-of-the-icc/definition-of-the-crime-of-aggression/ [27] Crime of aggression - Asser Institute https://www.asser.nl/knowledge-hub/browse-by-topic/crime-of-aggression/ [28] Crime of aggression - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_aggression [29] [PDF] Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/Rome-Statute-eng.pdf [30] The First Attempt to Prosecute the Crime of Aggression https://ir.law.fsu.edu/jtlp/vol28/iss1/3/ [31] Trump, Maduro and the Panama Precedent https://samf.substack.com/p/trump-maduro-and-the-panama-precedent [32] A predawn op in Latin America? The US has been here before, but the seizure of Venezuela’s Maduro is still unprecedented https://theconversation.com/a-predawn-op-in-latin-america-the-us-has-been-here-before-but-the-seizure-of-venezuelas-maduro-is-still-unprecedented-272664 [33] United States invasion of Panama - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama [34] Panama 1989-Venezuela 2025/ Here's the precedent for the US ... https://newsroompanama.com/2025/11/23/panama-1989-venezuela-2025-heres-the-precedent-for-the-us-study-against-maduro/ [35] Invading Panama and deposing Noriega in 1989 was easy, right? https://responsiblestatecraft.org/panama-invasion-venezuela/ [36] US capture of Maduro throws spotlight on Venezuela’s massive oil reserves https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-capture-maduro-throws-spotlight-venezuelas-massive-oil-reserves [37] Venezuela’s Toxic Relations with Iran and Hezbollah: an avenue of violence, crime, corruption and terrorism . http://localhost:8000/index.php/RBCP/article/view/520 [38] Inside Venezuela's growing arsenal of Iranian weapons https://taskandpurpose.com/news/venezuela-iran-united-states-caribbean/ [39] Hezbollah as an Iranian proxy and its progressive expansion in Latin America https://revistacientificaesmic.com/index.php/esmic/article/view/1277 [40] Hezbollah, Short on Support From Iran, Turns to Drug Trafficking in ... https://freebeacon.com/national-security/hezbollah-short-on-support-from-iran-turns-to-drug-trafficking-in-venezuela-to-fill-its-coffers/ [41] Hezbollah turns to Latin America networks as Iran faces pressure ... https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510222049 [42] U.S. and Israeli Navies Conclude Exercise Intrinsic Defender https://www.cusnc.navy.mil/Media/News/Display/Article/4357293/us-and-israeli-navies-conclude-exercise-intrinsic-defender/ [43] S.554 - United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025 119th ... https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/554/text [44] New Tehran banners threaten further attacks on Israel, US interests https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601013741 [45] When miscalculation meets a civilisation-state - Tehran Times http://www.tehrantimes.com/news/522399/When-miscalculation-meets-a-civilisation-state [46] Six Months After War, Israel Warns It Could Strike Iran Again https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/israel-iran-strike-warning-2026-e2a58159 [47] Iran-Israel tensions fuel fears of a new war in 2026 - النهار https://www.annahar.com/en/region/middle-east/266271/iran-israel-tensions-fuel-fears-of-a-new-war-in-2026 [48] Inside Venezuela’s oil industry: World’s largest oil reserves, failing infrastructure https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20260103-world-largest-oil-reserves-failing-infrastructure-inside-venezuela-oil-industry [49] China's Strategic Petroleum Reserves in Sino-Venezuela Relations https://jamestown.org/chinas-strategic-petroleum-reserves-in-sino-venezuela-relations/ [50] Maduro's capture is a calculated strike against China's energy lifeline https://in-cyprus.philenews.com/international/venezuela-maduro-capture-geopolitical-analysis-china-oil/ [51] Trump Suggests Venezuela Oil Exports to China Will Grow https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/venezuela-strikes/card/trump-suggests-venezuela-oil-exports-to-china-will-grow-mawzhI8LHNh2V4s5douU [52] U.S. will look to tap Venezuelan oil reserves, Trump says https://www.nbcnews.com/business/energy/us-will-look-tap-venezuelan-oil-reserves-trump-says-rcna252054 [53] Trump sees US oil giants driving Venezuela oil rebound. Energy execs are wary. https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/03/trump-venezuela-oil-us-companies-return-00709782 [54] Qatar as a mediator in conflict - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar_as_a_mediator_in_conflict [55] How Qatar Became the Middle East's Indispensable Mediator https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/10/28/qatar-middle-east-israel-hostages-hamas-gaza-mediator/ [56] How Qatar Became a Major Middle East Power Broker | TIME https://time.com/7022826/qatar-diplomacy-history/ [57] How the tiny Arab state of Qatar became indispensable in talks with ... https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/01/middleeast/qatar-mediation-israel-hamas-intl [58] [PDF] Universal Jurisdiction and Drug Trafficking: A Tool for Fighting One ... https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1389&context=fjil [59] Sovereignty and sovereign power | International Theory https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-theory/article/sovereignty-and-sovereign-power/861BC5EC463E89BDB50008D63692F94C [60] The Performativity of Sovereignty: Challenging Essentialism within ... https://www.e-ir.info/2020/12/19/the-performativity-of-sovereignty-challenging-essentialism-within-ir-theory/ [61] Two Responsibilities to Protect https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298221138944 [62] Libya and the Responsibility to Protect https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/libya-and-the-responsibility-to-protect/ [63] The Responsibility to (Selectively) Protect: R2P's Dubious Future ... https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/July-August-2023/Protect/ [64] [PDF] The Politics of Global Humanitarianism: R2P Before and After Libya https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/context/faculty_scholarship/article/5267/viewcontent/Doyle_The_Politics_of_Global_Humanitarianism.pdf [65] [PDF] THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AFTER LIBYA AND SYRIA https://thehagueinstituteforglobaljustice.org/files/files/dmfile/downloaddad11.pdf [66] [PDF] Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Libya https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/58438/ssoar-2011-gartner-The_Responsibility_to_Protect_R2P.pdf?sequence=1 [67] Kosovo and Libya: Lessons learned for limited humanitarianism? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01495933.2019.1653039 [68] R2P intervention, BRICS countries, and the no-fly zone measure in Libya https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2016.1250330 [69] Role of Process Legality in Norm Contestation: Rise and Fall of Human Protection http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03043754231169418 [70] Who will be Venezuela's new president following Maduro's capture? https://cbs4local.com/news/nation-world/who-will-be-venezuelas-new-president-following-maduros-capture-opposition-leader-maria-corina-machado-nobel-peace-prize-winner-edmundo-gonzalez [71] Navy, US hold five-day joint exercise across Israeli waters https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-880072 [72] Largest U.S.-Israeli Exercise in History Concludes - Department of War https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3279772/largest-us-israeli-exercise-in-history-concludes/ [73] María Corina Machado - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mar%C3%ADa_Corina_Machado [74] The Nobel Peace Prize 2025 – Maria Corina Machado https://www.nobelprize.org/the-nobel-peace-prize-2025-maria-corina-machado/ [75] Maria Corina Machado – Facts – 2025 - NobelPrize.org https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2025/machado/facts/ [76] Venezuelan Nobel winner tells BBC she knows 'risks' of Oslo trip ... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0q5p43qgl1o [77] Venezuela's Lost Year | Journal of Democracy https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exclusive/venezuelas-lost-year/ [78] Edmundo González says he won Venezuela's presidential election ... https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/03/asia/venezuela-presidential-candidate-argentina-milei-maduro-intl-latam [79] Edmundo González Urrutia - Nobel Peace Prize https://www.nobelpeaceprize.org/ballots-not-bullets-the-democratic-pathway-to-peace/edmundo-gonzalez-urrutia?instance=0 [80] Edmundo González https://genevasummit.org/speaker/edmundo-gonzalez-urrutia/ [81] Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado releases letter after Maduro's capture. Read the full text. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/venezuela-maria-corina-machado-releases-letter-read-text-maduro-capture/ [82] Trump says US will 'run' Venezuela until a 'safe' and 'judicious ... https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/who-will-be-venezuelas-new-president-following-maduros-capture-opposition-leader-maria-corina-machado-nobel-peace-prize-winner-edmundo-gonzalez [83] María Corina Machado: a controversial Nobel Peace Prize https://latinoamerica21.com/en/maria-corina-machado-a-controversial-nobel-peace-prize/ [84] Long Live Article 2(4) of the UN Charter? Four Ways to Save the Peaceful Rules-Based International Order after Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0090599224000400/type/journal_article [85] Policy Alert: Maduro's Venezuela is a Playground for ... - FDD Action https://www.fddaction.org/policy-alerts/2025/11/24/policy-alert-maduros-venezuela-is-a-playground-for-americas-adversaries/ [86] [PDF] potential cooperation between mexican drug cartels and al https://www.usmcu.edu/Portals/218/CAOCL/files/18Jun_Moeykens_Justin.pdf?ver=2019-04-17-133149-740 [87] Confronting Cartels: Military Considerations South of the Border https://ctc.westpoint.edu/feature-commentary-confronting-cartels-military-considerations-south-of-the-border/ [88] Labeling Mexican Cartels as Terrorist Organizations https://commons.stmarytx.edu/facarticles/504/ [89] Assessing the Designation of Mexican Cartels as Foreign Terrorist ... https://gbv.wilsoncenter.org/event/assessing-designation-mexican-cartels-foreign-terrorist-organizations-ftos [90] How Acting as Mediator Expands Qatar's Geopolitical Reach https://mecouncil.org/blog_posts/how-acting-as-mediator-expands-qatars-geopolitical-reach/ [91] Long Short-Term Memory as a Rainfall Forecasting Model for Bogor City in 2025-2026 https://jurnal.polibatam.ac.id/index.php/JAIC/article/view/9068 [92] Surgical Management of Kidney and Ureteral Stones: AUA Guideline (2026) Part II: Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Kidney and/or Ureteral Stones. http://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000004843 [93] Surgical Management of Kidney and Ureteral Stones: AUA Guideline (2026) Part I: Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Kidney and/or Ureteral Stones. http://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000004842 [94] Surgical Management of Kidney and Ureteral Stones: AUA Guideline (2026) Part III: Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Kidney and/or Ureteral Stones. http://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000004844 [95] Forecasting Dengue Fever Incidence in Thailand Using ARIMA: Implications for Public Health Planning https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ennrj/article/view/258375 [96] Forecasting Geomagnetic Disturbances in Solar Cycle 25 for Space Weather Prediction https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ade7fd [97] Forecasting Malaysian Rubber Prices Using Time Series Models https://journalajpas.com/index.php/AJPAS/article/view/796 [98] Pemodelan Stokastik Inflasi Bulanan Kota di Sumatera Utara Menggunakan SARIMA dan Simulasi Monte Carlo https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/article/view/933 [99] Enhancing Working Capital Financing Forecasting In Indonesian Islamic Banks: ARIMA Model Insights https://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/sustainable/article/view/28401 [100] Ecotourism’s Role in Conservation, Socio-Economic Development, and Climate Adaptation in Wanchi-Dandi, Ethiopia https://journals.zycentre.com/etsd/article/view/120 [101] Economic and Social Turmoil in Venezuela Caused by Autocracy and Misgovernance https://www.journals.resaim.com/ijresm/article/download/412/385 [102] The crisis in Venezuela: Drivers, transitions, and pathways http://www.erlacs.org/articles/10.32992/erlacs.10587/galley/10925/download/ [103] Rule of law crisis , militarization of citizen security, and effects on human rights in Venezuela http://www.erlacs.org/articles/10.32992/erlacs.10577/galley/10917/download/ [104] Trump gives Mar-a-Lago address to nation after US captures Maduro, strikes Venezuela https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/us-strikes-venezuela-maduro-captured-january-3-2026 [105] Unilateral U.S. military intervention to remove authoritarian dictator ... https://www.wola.org/2026/01/military-action-venezuela-united-states-maduro-trump/ [106] The Reported Capture of Nicolás Maduro https://www.military.com/feature/2026/01/03/reported-capture-of-nicolas-maduro.html [107] Trump bombs Venezuela, US ‘captures’ Maduro: All that we know https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/3/trump-bombs-venezuela-us-captures-maduro-all-that-we-know [108] Video: CNN analyst breaks down photo of Maduro in custody https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/03/world/video/nicolas-maduro-arrest-photo-trump-john-miller-digvid [109] U.S. captures Maduro and his wife after striking Venezuela - PBS https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/live-updates-u-s-captures-maduro-and-his-wife-after-striking-venezuela [110] What we know about a US strike that captured Venezuela’s Maduro and what comes next https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-us-maduro-what-to-know-a57528ff315a7f70ed51a1721f5e0bc2 [111] Venezuela attack updates: US to 'run' country after Maduro capture, Trump says https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2026/01/03/jets-and-blasts-shake-venezuelan-capital/87244708007/ [112] Venezuela Live Updates: Trump Says U.S. Will ‘Run the Country’ After Capture of Maduro https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01/03/world/trump-united-states-strikes-venezuela [113] A timeline of U.S. military escalation against Venezuela leading to Maduro's capture https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/a-timeline-of-u-s-military-escalation-against-venezuela-leading-to-maduros-capture [114] Trump says Venezuela's Maduro captured after strikes https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/loud-noises-heard-venezuela-capital-southern-area-without-electricity-2026-01-03/ [115] How the US captured Venezuela's leader Nicolas Maduro - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEN39uKOYeU [116] WATCH: Trump holds news conference after announcing U.S. has captured Venezuelan leader Maduro https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/watch-live-trump-holds-news-conference-after-announcing-u-s-has-captured-venezuelan-leader-maduro [117] Trump says Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, wife ‘captured’ after large-scale strikes https://nypost.com/2026/01/03/world-news/at-least-7-explosions-and-low-flying-aircraft-are-heard-in-venezuelas-caracas/ [118] 'We are going to run the country,' Trump says after strike on Venezuela https://www.npr.org/2026/01/03/g-s1-104329/explosions-caracas-venezuela [119] How the United States carried out the Maduro arrest in Venezuela https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vH9sfZK_28 [120] What led up to US capturing Maduro | CNN https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/03/world/video/what-led-up-to-us-capturing-maduro-digvid-vrtc [121] Trump administration notifying congressional leadership of Maduro operation https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/venezuela-explosions-caracas-intl-hnk-01-03-26?post-id=cmjyan6qd0000356p9flgpmea [122] Trump Attacks Venezuela and Captures President Maduro - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okFXXXWlKBQ [123] America First? What Trump's startling arrest of Maduro tells us. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/01/03/analysis-trump-venezuela-attack-maduro-capture/88004870007/ [124] Photos: Aftermath of strikes in Venezuela : The Picture Show https://www.npr.org/sections/the-picture-show/2026/01/03/g-s1-104359/photos-aftermath-of-strikes-in-venezuela [125] "Reconciliación no implica transacción": María Corina Machado https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/988db17f0c4bc638ff32d2825a3fc4f44adaa2e8 [126] "Venezuela se encamina a un proceso de desctruccuón acelerado: (entrevista con Maria Corina Machado) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c3e4c15d041138963141ac6fded2e54124f3638 [127] Making Sense of Opposition in Venezuela: From the MUD to “La Salida” and Back. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/363838491170822b9d66dda33e34897c57c79c62 [128] Variación espacial del suelo y el paisaje en la cuenca alta del río Güey, estado Aragua, Venezuela https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18154668d5d4d0e60e974451269e1a12f026cff0 [129] Contra el maleficio de la "guerra de colores": intentos de desestabilización en Venezuela https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdfaca28f8209a0c896fd2e2a0b080cc3390a798 [130] Evaluación ambiental, agrícola y forestal de tierras de la cuenca alta del río Guárico, Venezuela https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d31b9965b972f813ee01e9ac98be5c938aaba92 [131] Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbe044e6fbbddb55eb636e4b16599da3aeff70dc [132] La triple crisis de Venezuela https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf8a2f57d6739ec6e815e70db4f0b0fac7d2327f [133] Contra la violencia fascista en Venezuela https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1bf699e6cdce2020195eaf3fb75711fa4665020 [134] Land physics evaluation of the high Guarico River basin with sustainable water production purposes https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53bc0c9c93a312a35ab0c3d9d5fe071cf43ba4b0 [135] In the Name of the People: Democratization, Popular Organizations, and Populism in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador http://www.erlacs.org/articles/10.18352/erlacs.9229/galley/9617/download/ [136] Micropolitics in a Caracas Barrio: The Political Survival Strategies of Mothers in a Context of Armed Violence http://larrlasa.org/articles/10.25222/larr.196/galley/381/download/ [137] Archipiélagos politicos bajo la tormenta en Venezuela: Coaliciones, actores y autocratización http://www.erlacs.org/articles/10.32992/erlacs.10568/galley/10926/download/ [138] Venezuela in U.S. public diplomacy, 1950s–2000s: The Cold War, democratization, and the digitalization of politics https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2019.1693109 [139] Exploring food security/insecurity determinants within Venezuela’s complex humanitarian emergency https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10954010/ [140] The Conceptual Politics of Democracy Promotion: The Venezuela Case https://socialiststudies.com/index.php/sss/article/download/27270/20228 [141] Élites y populistas: los casos de Venezuela y Ecuador http://www.iberoamericana.se/articles/10.16993/iberoamericana.504/galley/475/download/ [142] The scientists of the IVIC in the evolution of science and technology policy during the Chávez administration in Venezuela https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/25729861.2019.1616953?needAccess=true [143] María Corina Machado interview: Venezuela Nobel winner promises Israel alliance https://www.israelhayom.com/2026/01/03/maria-corina-machado-venezuela-nobel-maduro-israel-interview/ [144] Explainer: Was the US capture of Venezuela's president legal? https://www.reuters.com/world/us/was-us-capture-venezuelas-president-legal-2026-01-03/ [145] US Airpower Paved the Way for Delta Force to Capture Venezuela’s Maduro https://www.airandspaceforces.com/us-airpower-paved-the-way-for-delta-force-to-capture-venezuelas-maduro/ [146] Live updates: Maduro, wife arrive in New York after being captured in Venezuela https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/venezuela-explosions-caracas-intl-hnk-01-03-26 [147] Inside ‘Operation Absolute Resolve,’ the U.S. Effort to Capture Maduro https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/03/us/politics/trump-capture-maduro-venezuela.html [148] Will Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Corina Machado ... - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUnrnlJGKSI [149] Venezuela—Indictments, Invasions, and the Constitution’s Crumbling Guardrails https://www.cato.org/blog/indictments-invasions-constitutions-crumbling-guardrails [150] María Corina Machado emerges as top potential successor after Máduro’s fall https://www.foxnews.com/world/maria-corina-machado-emerges-top-potential-successor-after-maduros-fall [151] Human rights in Venezuela - Amnesty International https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/americas/south-america/venezuela/report-venezuela/ [152] What we know about US strikes on Venezuela https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crmlz7r0zrxo [153] FARC-Hezbollah: The success of Venezuela-Iran proxy groups and their convergence in the Americas https://securityanddefence.pl/FARC-Hezbollah-The-success-of-Venezuela-Iran-proxy-groups-and-their-convergence-in,130934,0,2.html [154] AFTER SOLEIMANI: IRAN’S PROXY NETWORKS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR STABILITY IN THE PERSIAN GULF https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5273ed5eb3e8ffcf2ff50d5f756fba8bada93c87 [155] Evolution of Iran’s Regional Influence amid the Weakening of Traditional Partners https://www.imemo.ru/en/index.php?page_id=1650&article_id=16632 [156] Iran’s policy on the war in Gaza https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/magazines/puty_miru/2024/01/04-Bijan.pdf [157] Iran's Terrorist Proxy: Penetrating the United States with Nuclear Material as the Trigger to Setting off a US Media Explosion, Is a Reality. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ba67a3b89a0af63917f99733f5129dbb99410e2 [158] Iran: being a nuclear threshold state within a national resistance context http://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.17218/hititsbd.1184317 [159] Iran Courts Latin America https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23d9dccd1430818fba26f6e58b0a7e9b22695b7e [160] Evolution of the global terrorist organizational cooperation network https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281615 [161] The Hidden Internet of Iran: Private Address Allocations on a National Network http://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.6398.pdf [162] A Complex Networks Approach to Find Latent Clusters of Terrorist Groups https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.03367.pdf [163] Dealers and Brokers in Civil Wars: Why States Delegate Rebel Support to Conduit Countries https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-pdf/47/4/107/2090983/isec_a_00461.pdf [164] Evolution of the global terrorist organizational cooperation network https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10824412/ [165] The geopolitics behind the routes data travels: a case study of Iran https://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/1911/1911.07723v1.pdf [166] New Online Ecology of Adversarial Aggregates: ISIS and beyond https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.09426.pdf [167] Brokering between (not so) overt and (not so) covert networks in conflict zones https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17440572.2019.1596806?needAccess=true [168] Maduro's Fall and Israel's Strategic Opening | Jose Lev Alvarez Gomez https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/maduros-fall-and-israels-strategic-opening/ [169] Oil, China, and the Monroe Doctrine: The Strategic Calculations ... https://www.bocaratontribune.com/bocaratonnews/2026/01/oil-china-and-the-monroe-doctrine-the-strategic-calculations-behind-trumps-offensive-in-venezuela/ [170] Nuclear Deterrence and International Law: Assessing Compliance with Article 2(4) of the UN Charter https://lseee.net/index.php/hc/article/view/2047 [171] How Many Deaths Can Article 2(4) UN Charter Die? https://academic.oup.com/book/39524/chapter/339356920 [172] Military Assistance Based on Ex-Ante Consent: a Violation of Article 2 (4) UN Charter? https://elibrary.bwv-verlag.de/article/10.35998/fw-2020-0017 [173] Beyond Conventional War: Cyber Attacks and the Interpretation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter https://www.glsrjournal.com/article/beyond-conventional-war-cyber-attacks-and-the-interpretation-of-article-24-of-the-un-charter [174] The Conflict Between Humanitarian Intervention and the Principle of Non-Intervention in Article 2(7) of the UN Charter https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/slj/article/view/1103 [175] Challenges to the Prohibition to Use Force: Does the Straitjacket of Article 2(4) UN Charter Begin to Gall too Much? https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047416050/B9789047416050_s008.xml [176] ‘Cyber-rattling: can ‘pre-positioning’ in cyberspace amount to a threat of the use of force under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20531702.2024.2413791 [177] Crimea Responsibility to Protect and Self-Determination under Article 2 of the UN Charter https://www.dpublication.com/conference-proceedings/index.php/gssconf/article/view/152 [178] Article 2(4) and Authoritarian International Law https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772322000198/type/journal_article [179] The Decoupling of the Nation and the State: Constitutionalizing Transnational Nationhood, Cross-Border Connectivity, Diaspora, and “National” Identity-Affiliation in Asia and Beyond https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/161C39EDC6E5057BB1B39DF730D67540/S2052901519000263a.pdf/div-class-title-the-decoupling-of-the-nation-and-the-state-constitutionalizing-transnational-nationhood-cross-border-connectivity-diaspora-and-national-identity-affiliation-in-asia-and-beyond-div.pdf [180] The Fight against Terrorism in the Ring of Sovereignty https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ilr/article/download/0/0/47037/50327 [181] The Evolution of State Sovereignty under International Institutions Led to Less Use of Force and More Efficient Dispute Settlement https://lnep.ewapublishing.org/media/ed53bf1574d346949052d68f4aaf042f.marked.pdf [182] In Defense of Sovereignty, in the Wake of Tallinn 2.0 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/8B742A410CCBED0E4967BB7FB15D3D7D/S2398772317000563a.pdf/div-class-title-in-defense-of-sovereignty-in-the-wake-of-tallinn-2-0-div.pdf [183] Regional Orders, Geopolitics, and the Future of International Law https://academic.oup.com/clp/article-pdf/74/1/149/41974108/cuab005.pdf [184] Westphalian Sovereignty and the Free-Rider Conundrum in the Atmospheric Commons: Examining Global Governance Regimes for Addressing Climate Change Adaptation http://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/10.5334/ijc.1159/galley/1209/download/ [185] Long Live Article 2(4) of the UN Charter? Four Ways to Save the Peaceful Rules-Based International Order after Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9E8FA06E66AF77B8181DACFE95A234A3/S0090599224000400a.pdf/div-class-title-long-live-article-2-4-of-the-un-charter-four-ways-to-save-the-peaceful-rules-based-international-order-after-russia-s-invasion-of-ukraine-div.pdf [186] CONTRASTING U.S., CHINESE AND RUSSIAN PERCEPTIONS OF SOVEREIGNTY https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/download/123/139 [187] [PDF] Article 2 (4) and the 'Threshold' of the Use of Force https://ppuam.amu.edu.pl/uploads/PPUAM%20vol.%208/08%20Kleczkowska.pdf [188] [PDF] Vol. 1 No. 1 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 11 https://iipsl.jura.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/sites/iipsl/Forschung/Anlagen/14_Maerz_2015/zu15.pdf [189] [PDF] Should Terrorism Be Subject to Universal Jurisdiction? https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=scujil [190] Terrorism and Universal Jurisdiction: Opening a Pandora's Box? https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol27/iss2/13/ [191] [PDF] Rethinking Westphalian Sovereignty in the 21st Century http://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/5508-a-people-betrayed-the-darfur-crisis-and-international-law-rethinking-westphalian-sovereignty-in-the-21st-century.pdf [192] US war on “narco-terrorists” violates the right to life, warn UN experts ... https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/us-war-narco-terrorists-violates-right-life-warn-un-experts-after-deadly [193] [PDF] The Westphalian Peace Tradition in International Law https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1435&context=ils [194] [PDF] Guide for the Legislative Incorporation and Implementation ... - Unodc https://www.unodc.org/documents/terrorism/Publications/Guide_Legislative_Incorporation_Implementation/English.pdf [195] Psychoanalytic theories and techniques: Dialogue, difficulties and future – Papers from the XXIInd IFPS Forum, Madrid, October 19–22, 2022 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0803706X.2023.2184954 [196] As clear as MUD: government and opposition in Bolivarian Venezuela. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1456d58f4339b3b3fd4a12b72626c782fa6fe833 [197] ¿Código de Ética o Constitución Moral? http://www.derechoglobal.cucsh.udg.mx/index.php/DG/article/view/230 [198] Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America . By Aníbal Pérez-Linán. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 241p. \$84.00 cloth. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592709091312/type/journal_article [199] When populism takes over the delivery of health care: Venezuela https://ecancer.org/en/journal/editorial/73-when-populism-takes-over-the-delivery-of-health-care-venezuela/pdf [200] Separating the Chaff from the Wheat: An Exploration of Latin American Political Regimes https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20230701.15.pdf [201] With the cards stacked against you. Challenges to a negotiated transition to democracy in Venezuela http://www.erlacs.org/articles/10.32992/erlacs.10553/galley/10918/download/ [202] The Streets as Examples of “True” Democracy? The South-American Experience http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/iberoamericana/article/download/21304/13880 [203] Sanctions and Venezuelan Migration https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.19301.pdf [204] The Promise and Perils of Radical Left Populism: The Case of Venezuela https://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/jwsr/article/download/868/1169 [205] Venezuelan opposition activists in Madrid warily cheer Maduro capture https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/venezuelan-opposition-activists-madrid-warily-cheer-maduro-capture-2026-01-03/ [206] Trump's toppling of Maduro is fraught with risk - what happens next is unclear https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0q4dg1kn8vo [207] Tracking Trump and Latin America: Security—Trump Blockades ... https://www.as-coa.org/articles/tracking-trump-and-latin-america-security-trump-blockades-sanctioned-venezuelan-oil [208] Treasury Sanctions Venezuelan Cartel Headed by Maduro https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0207 [209] U.S. Has Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro (Updated) https://www.twz.com/news-features/explosions-ring-out-across-caracas-as-u-s-special-ops-helicopters-fly-over-city [210] Parliament honours Edmundo González Urrutia and María Corina ... https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20241212IPR25959/parliament-honours-edmundo-gonzalez-urrutia-and-maria-corina-machado [211] What is Cartel de los Soles, the latest group designated 'terrorist' by ... https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/24/what-is-cartel-de-los-soles-the-latest-group-designated-terrorist-by-us [212] A timeline of the US military's buildup and strikes against Venezuela ... https://abc7chicago.com/post/nicolas-maduro-venezuela-news-timeline-us-military-buildup-strikes-leading-capture-donald-trump/18347527/ [213] Operation Southern Spear, the U.S. Military, and Lawlessness | Proceedings - December 2025 Vol. 151/12/1,474 https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2025/december/operation-southern-spear-us-military-and-lawlessness [214] U.S. Southern Command Official Website https://www.southcom.mil [215] Today is a moment to celebrate the ouster of the brutal socialist ... https://x.com/GovofCO/status/2007524695625859351 [216] Liberal interventionism and the case of Libya https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f50bb92cb67b204c1a3a5b8a7eda9b8b493dbc71 [217] Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: Between Opportunistic Humanitarianism and Value-Free Pragmatism https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a1f5be6a36400afffd800c77fc6c4f06973b011 [218] Responsibility to protect, NATO and the problem of who should intervene: reassessing the intervention in Libya* https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14781158.2017.1384719 [219] Norms of protection: responsibility to protect, protection of civilians and their interaction https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/755921fd9375a7c2c65936ace90315b0deb744c4 [220] A Theoretical Assessment of Humanitarian Intervention and R2P https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb39cf4c8d4e3cdea24a545cdbccc489083a50ee [221] Book Review: Comparative Politics: Political Leaders and Democratic Elections https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1478-9302.12016_56 [222] The politics of global humanitarianism: The responsibility to protect before and after Libya http://link.springer.com/10.1057/ip.2015.35 [223] Implementasi Doktrin Responsibility to Protect (Humanitarian Intervention) dalam Hukum Internasional (Kasus Kosovo Libya dan Suriah) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/899d4a6366ea43dbd46af8ad26e9fe87098132c0 [224] Does Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Make Difference to Civilians?: An Analytical and Evaluation Study http://www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp/article/download/2733/2773 [225] The Connection and Distinction Between Responsibility to Protect and Humanitarian Intervention under International Law https://lnep.ewapublishing.org/media/26d0d35e1ddd477c94ae22679864951a.marked_q8J3Kw0.pdf [226] Is a European Practice of Mass Atrocity Prevention Emerging? The European Union, Responsibility to Protect and the 2011 Libya Crisis https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/download/315/315 [227] The Responsibility to Protect: Libya and Côte D’Ivoire http://amsterdamlawforum.org/articles/10.37974/ALF.195/galley/324/download/ [228] Responsibility to Protect: Way to Reduce Oppression or Way to Escalate Oppression http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?paperID=113024 [229] A Responsibility to Prevent? A Norm's Political and Legal Effects http://amsterdamlawforum.org/articles/10.37974/ALF.239/galley/368/download/ [230] [PDF] International Law, International Relations Theory, and Preemptive War https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1405&context=faculty_scholarship [231] International Relations 101 (#2): Sovereignty - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwoA8CpdGuk [232] How the Court works - | International Criminal Court https://www.icc-cpi.int/about/how-the-court-works [233] Sovereignty - Key Concepts in International Relations https://sk.sagepub.com/dict/mono/download/key-concepts-in-international-relations/chpt/sovereignty.pdf [234] [PDF] R2P and Intervention After Libya - Bryant Digital Repository https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=histss_jou [235] [PDF] The Case for Semi-Sovereign Participation in International Relations https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/0bfb3951-db36-44c3-90d0-3bad380da790/download [236] The Rise and Fall of the Responsibility to Protect | CFR Education https://education.cfr.org/learn/timeline/rise-and-fall-responsibility-protect [237] The Crime of Aggression | Coalition for the International Criminal Court https://coalitionfortheicc.org/crime-aggression-July-2025 [238] Malaysia’s defense cooperation and joint military exercises with the United States and China: Quasi allies, trustable partners, potential adversaries https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2025.2494492 [239] India–Japan Defense Partnership in the Indo-Pacific: Geopolitical Prospects and Challenges Under Trump https://e-jlia.com/index.php/jlia/article/view/1889 [240] MILITARY AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY TO UKRAINE IN THE FULL-SCALE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR (2022 – 2025) http://eustudies.history.knu.ua/military-and-humanitarian-assistance-of-the-kingdom-of-norway-to-ukraine-in-the-full-scale-russian-ukrainian-war-2022-2025/ [241] Ֆրանսիայի արտաքին քաղաքականության փոփոխությունների ազդեցությունը Հարավային Կովկասի անվտանգային ճարտարապետության ձևավորման վրա / The impact of changes in France’s foreign policy on the configuration of the South Caucasus security architecture https://haykakanbanak.am/?p=5957 [242] Study strengthens Missile Defense Cooperation with South Korea, U.S. and Japan in response to North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons and Missile Threats https://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/article/detail/4010070304195 [243] China’s Defense Cooperation with Latin America and Caribbean: Trends and Limitations https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/3345 [244] Normalizing the Israel asset : the Reagan administration and the second cold war in the Middle East : leverage, blowback and the institutionalization of the US-Israel 'special relationship' http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3825/ [245] Viability of Pak-Russia Military Cooperation http://asc-centralasia.edu.pk/index.php/ca/article/view/217 [246] Turkey-United States Defense Cooperation: Prospects and Challenges * https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/856d355d1210ef121f67ada7e5e7a459328f9a97 [247] The ambivalence of the implementation of the US arctic policy: integrating and disintegration factors of the allies https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2024.1341375/full [248] Campaigning with partners in the fourth age of SOF – the case of Norwegian – U.S. High North collaboration https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01495933.2024.2409043 [249] Conflict, rockets, and birth outcomes: evidence from Israel's Operation Protective Edge https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/8838CE241813043C64585D551BF1AE05/S2054089222000189a.pdf/div-class-title-conflict-rockets-and-birth-outcomes-evidence-from-israel-s-operation-protective-edge-div.pdf [250] Simple fusion-fission quantifies Israel-Palestine violence and suggests multi-adversary solution https://arxiv.org/html/2409.02816v2 [251] The U.S.-Israeli Strategic Alliance: How the United States Is Contributing to a "Disappearing" Palestine http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?paperID=62569 [252] Iran signals deterrence as Israel weighs missile threat https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-881116 [253] U.S. Security Cooperation with Israel - State Department https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-israel [254] Designating Cartels And Other Organizations As Foreign Terrorist ... https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/designating-cartels-and-other-organizations-as-foreign-terrorist-organizations-and-specially-designated-global-terrorists/ [255] Designation of International Cartels - State Department https://www.state.gov/designation-of-international-cartels [256] US, Israel kick off joint naval drills aimed at regional threats https://www.iranintl.com/en/202512073764 [257] Israel Mulls New Iran Strikes as Strategic Restraint Collapses https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/israel-mulls-new-iran-strikes-as-strategic-restraint-collapses/ [258] Israeli navy and US 5th Fleet complete joint five-day exercise https://nypost.com/2025/12/12/world-news/israeli-navy-and-us-5th-fleet-complete-joint-five-day-exercise/ [259] How Close Is Israel to Launching a Military Strike on Iran https://caspianpost.com/analytics/how-close-is-israel-to-launching-a-military-strike-on-iran